Will Putin fall?
At the moment, Metaculus, a website aggregating individual forecasts, gives a 20% chance of this happening by Feb 2023.
So: popular uprising, coup or hardening of the regime? A few quick considerations. 🧵
First it is important to understand the nature of the Russian regime. Seemingly on the path to democratisation after 1989, Russia has progressively become more & more authoritarian while retaining some democratic features (e.g. access to internet) which limit the regime’s power.
The growing authoritarianism seems however to have transformed Russia in a very personal dictatorship centred around Putin. So what could happen? slate.com/news-and-polit…
Popular uprising?
The West is hoping for massive demonstrations to take place in Russia. “Why are they not demonstrating in mass they could overrun the police forces” one can wonder. The key problem of popular uprising is to solve a coordination problem. press.princeton.edu/books/paperbac…
Demonstrations appear when people get confident that others are going to participate. A very emotionally charged event like the unnecessary invasion of a culturally close country, an acute economic crisis, and the loss of lives could tilt the scales to larger demonstrations.
The success of such a scenario in Russia is uncertain. There are certainly strong democratic aspirations, but the bulk of the population is maintained in a fog by the main media. Social media can make a difference, but will it be enough to trigger large protests?
The key is to reach the tipping point where the regime forces start doubting. If limited, protests could instead lead to a tightening of the police state. The most unpredictable & dangerous situation would be sizeable but not large enough protests (100k). journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.23…
Coup?
Russia has grown into a single man dictatorship. But any non-democratic regime relies on a coalition. If the oligarchs decided to drop Putin, they could. The evidence suggests it is a one man adventure. Why don’t they drop him?
First they have to solve the same coordination problem as the demonstrators. If you all agree to remove Putin, fine. But it is risky. The extraordinary actions from Putin—and the fact that he isolates himself—may help them up the chatter to the point they can coordinate.👇
In this one man regime, everything relies on Putin’s presence. If they get rid of him, the system could collapse taking them too in its fall. The Russian oligarchs are in the same plane as Putin and he may be the only one who can pilot it.
Hardening of the regime?
It is a real possibility, like in Belarus. The coalition around Putin, may prefer to go all-in instead of risking regime change. There would be a progressive elimination of the remaining democratic aspects in society, like free access to internet.
So what are the chances of Putin falling? Given the different challenges to regime change, I think around 20% is a fair guess. It is possible, but not the most likely.
One thing for sure, Putin has taken a huge risk for his regime and the future is very uncertain.
You may wonder what this 20% mean since Putin will either fall or he will not. So I’ll leave with this astute observation from Bertrand Russell.
End/
It is regrettable that many Western commentators repeated Putin’s narrative that the problem came from an aggressive NATO expansion aimed at encircling Russia.
Time for a reset of narratives. Here are some simple insights, informed by our work on the game theory of alliances. 🧵
NATO is a voluntary association, and an association with Russia would also have (initially) been largely voluntarily.
But Eastern European countries *demanded* to join NATO. While NATO countries were initially not warm about this prospect.
What about countries from the former USSR (Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine)? Russia proposed an economic integration, the “Community of Independent States” (CIS). It failed because the other countries resisted integration.
CIS 👇
There has been a recent debate on Twitter on the notion of “utility” in economics. I’ll try to give some perspective to help understand the disagreements. 🧵
One reason why the discussion about utility can be confusing is that two types of interpretation co-exist in economics. On the one hand, economic students are typically told in introductory microeconomics that utility is just a number to reflect the order of preferences.
On the other hand, students will be presented either explicitly or implicitly with interpretations of utility as measuring some kind of satisfaction in other courses.
This is an amazing story. In 1912, Greek soldiers took an island from the Ottoman Empire. The soldiers were thinking that the inhabitants were Greek, but the local kids said "No, we are Romans".
And they were Romans... from the former Roman Empire. 1/6
In the West, we date the end of the Roman Empire to around 476BC. But the "Eastern" Roman Empire persisted and its people *were* Romans. This Roman identity persisted even after the fall of Constantinople in 1453. 2/6
This is the extent of the Roman Empire in 555BC. It still included Rome! And it continued to include the city until the 8th century.
Rome had not been the capital of the Empire for a long time and losing Rome did not change their self-identification as "Romans". 3/6
In Italy, fascist groups used violence against political opponents to deter them and prevent them from seating in Parliament.
from Ebner's amazon.com/Ordinary-Viole…
In France, militarised leagues went close to what seems a coup d'Etat in 1934, with riots generated by conspiracy theories around a corruption affair.
from Kalman's amazon.com.au/Extreme-Right-…
Eventually, Germany's and Italy's democracy decayed into dictatorships.
There is definitely a lesson from history: democratic institutions can fail and we should not take them for granted.
The Nobel Prize in economics went to theorists who made major contributions to our understanding of how to design auctions.
If it seems far from you, it should not. Auction theory is one of the major successes in economics which had very large real world implications. (Thread)
Economists are known to like markets. Markets are a way to allocate resources. But they are not the only one. Auctions are another way to organise who get what, at what price. You are surely familiar with art auctions, housing auctions, or eBay auctions.
But really the notion of auction is very broad. Contests such as sporting matches, legal battles, political races, grant applications can also be conceived as auctions where contestants bid resources in the hope of securing a prize. link.springer.com/article/10.100…