Marc Owen Jones Profile picture
Mar 3, 2022 21 tweets 14 min read Read on X
Thread 1/ This is a thread on pro-Russian propaganda & #disinformation. I analysed the hashtags "i stand with Putin" & "i stand with Russia'. I analysed around 20,000 Twitter interactions involving 9600 unique accounts

Bots ✔️
Engagement Farming ✔️

#UkraineRussianWar
#Ukraine Image
2/ The network graph shows Twitter accounts interacting. The nodes represent individual accounts, the lines between them tweets, RTs replies etc. Different colours are different communities (accounts that tend to interact with one another more) #UkraineRussiaWar #Ukraine Image
3/ Below. You can see three distinct clusters.
Cluster 1 (left) accounts that seem to support the hashtag (pro Putin and Russia)
Cluster 2 (middle) = accounts criticising the hashtag
Cluster 3 (bottom) = accounts and bots spamming hashtag and thus boosting it
#UkraineRussianWar Image
4/ The bot type cluster (cluster 3) seem to be accounts offering products, laptops etc, jumping on the hashtag to promote their wares. Most of them seem to be connected to Kenya, including this Kenyan opposition account. Of course, their tweets boost the trend
#UkraineRussianWar ImageImage
5/ Cluster 2, the anti Putin accounts, are very active, and very large. These are people, like @NickKnudsenUS and @PalmerReport who are condemning the hashtag. This is well meaning of course, but boosts the hashtag, which many would consider a bad thing
#UkraineRussianWar ImageImage
6/ Then we have cluster 1, the people seemingly supporting putin, russia and war. Some of the most retweeted accounts on this hashtag include @sachin012yadav , a pro-Modi account - only 56 followers and around 260 tweets, despite an old account from 2015 . Profile pic seems ImageImageImage
7/ to lead to some website offering tutors. Another popular tweet is the account based out of Pakistan posting a video of Trump defending Putin through whataboutism. It's ok though, this guy's a Capricorn... 🙄

#UkraineRussianWar ImageImageImageImage
8/ One of the most popular retweets below is from an account that appears to use a stock image as a profile picture. It also is a 7year old account with less than 200 tweets, but somehow the tweet has thousands of tweets + likes.
#UkraineRussiaWar ImageImage
9/ Most of the account that report their own location data (obviously can't be construed as accurate - but is interesting), say they are based in Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria, India and the US. This locational information is interesting as most of the tweets use same tropes Image
10/ Many of the tropes focus on whataboutism and have been inspired by Western media racism. There is emphasis on Western hypocrisy and double standards, and racism. Not sure why that makes it ok for Russia to invade Ukraine and to stand with Putin...
#UkraineRussianWar ImageImageImage
11/ There are a few common engagement techniques, presumably designed to drive traffic on the hashtag. A lot of these tweets asking you to RT or like depending on whether you support Russia or Ukraine appear to be very popular
#UkraineRussianWar
#disinformation ImageImage
12/ There are lots of other red flags too, such as a disproportionately large number of accounts created in the past few weeks. Some of these accounts, while barely a day old, have crazy high engagement rates too. Check out MANIKAN00673636 for example. #UkraineRussiaWar ImageImage
13/ A note re whataboutism. Many of the tropes create the straw man that 'No one condemns West when they do this, so why condemn Russia'. While there is an underlying truth, it is also extreme hyperbole, designed to deflect attention from Russia's current invasion to the West's ImageImageImage
14/ past behaviour. While future media analyses will be telling, at the moment it just serves to remove sympathy from Ukrainians by painting them as part of a racist and hypocritical Western establishment. I doubt dead civilians the world over will enjoy being used this way
15/ anyway, that's it for now. To sum up. There are bots, spam and what appears to be lots of inauthentic behaviour driving the 'i stand with putin' and 'i stand with russia' hashtag. Of course there are real people in there too, not least those condemning the hashtag. #Ukraine
16/ One of the dominant themes of the hashtag appears to be polarization/adversarial: exploiting incidences of racism and western bias to try and undermine sympathy for Ukrainians, and thus paint Putin as somehow standing up to the West #UkraineRussiaWar #disinformation
17/ For those asking - I used @nodexl to import tweets, Gephi for the network graph, and tableau for the timelines
19/ Just to be clear. The main clusters don't look like bots.The Kenyan cluster and cluster I mention in the update do look automated. Many of the rest look suspicious, like troll or astroturfing accounts, though I'm aware people use the term bots as shorthand for 'dodgy account'
20/ Another update. This thread is a detailed dive into just one of the accounts spreading the propaganda. Enjoy!
21/ Here's another update on this thread. Summary: Twitter suspended some, but not all of the bots, and there is proof.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

Jul 8
1/ Another key aspect of this campaign was the part targeting #Lebanon. The accounts below are all linked to the campaign. All of them attempt to interfere in Lebanese politics by riling up sectarian sentiment, diverting blame away from Israel and focusing on Iran and Hezbollah
Image
2/ These groups, with names like "No to the Iranian Occupation", "Shia Against War", and "the war of 2006 is remembered and will not be repeated" position themselves as groups representing real people. They all use similar TTPs & identical branding strategies. All have been
3/ suspended from Facebook but not Twitter, and many have run ads. Shia Against War, for example, paid to advertise content from the Tahoror movement (see right). However Tahoror denied any involvement with the group.
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jul 8
1/ 📝Excited to announce the release of "The Qatar Plot," authored by myself & @SohanDsouza. This investigation (covered in @afp today) reveals a massive influence op targeting Qatar & Muslims, including in the US, UK and EU - ahead of European Elections
sites.google.com/view/theqatarp…
Image
2/ 🚨 Our findings uncover a vast network spreading xenophobic, anti-Muslim, anti-immigration, and anti-Qatar disinformation. The operation spanned platforms like Facebook, Twitter/X, YouTube, and TikTok. To a lesser extent, the op also target Iran🌐 #Disinfo #Islamophobia Image
3/ 🇫🇷🇬🇧🇺🇸 Targeted countries include France, the UK, the USA, Germany, Spain, Sweden Saudi,and more. This network reached millions, manipulating ,public sentiment with at least 41 million reached on Facebook alone (and this is a conservative estimate). 📈 #QatarPlotReport Image
Read 15 tweets
May 27
🧵1/ There is some confusion going on around the strike in Rafah. This is largely due to awful IDF instructions. In a video on 22nd May IDF spokesman @AvichayAdraee told people that Zones 2371, 2373, 2360 were safe. I have highlighted this below.
Image
2/ The source of the confusion lies in the fact that the image of the highlighted map in @AvichayAdraee's video DOES NOT match the text. The image initially does not include zones 2371, 2373, 2360 yet the text explicitly states they are safe. Image
3/ However the location of the strike has been reported to be both 2371 and 2372. Existing geolocation by @m_osint and Al Jazeera suggests it was in 2372, not 2371. Zone 2372 was not explicitly mentioned by the IDF. However...

Image
Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
May 20
1) Telegraph subtly trying to align pro-Palestinian voices with Chinese and Russian disinformation. No actual evidence is provided here of Chinese and Russian interference, simply a note that some pro-Palestinian accounts have fake followers. Image
2) (It should be noted that you can't control who follows you). From my point of view there are a LOT of fake accounts on X promoting various points of view. However, there is more evidence for Israel using fake accounts on FB, Insta and X to smear UNRWA aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/19…
Image
3) Interestingly, the network that was focusing on attacking UNRWA, is also focusing on blaming the Chinese/Russian/Iranian 'axis of evil'. While it's plausible China and Russia are trying to influence narratives, the narrative that China and Russia are the only ones operating
Read 11 tweets
May 15
🧵1/ Israel are attempting to muddy the waters around the killing of an international UN worker in a clearly marked vehicle. They have released a video claiming that "terrorists" are roaming and shooting at a UNRWA compound. There's no evidence that indicates they are Image
2/ terrorists. The video shows armed men mingling with what are probably UN workers. There is no sense of coercion or animosity in those shots. Crucially, there is no caveat that these people might not be factions or Hamas police protecting aid convoys.
Image
Image
3/ The US has even asked Israel to stop targeting Hamas police officers trying to protect aid. Naturally the video provides no context, and remember the IDF are an organisation that recently murdered multiple aid workers in clearly marked vehicles. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 13
🧵1/ I am somewhat dismayed (though sadly unsurprised) by this extremely disingenuous and callous reporting about Palestinian death figures. Claims that the UN have revised down its death toll are absolutely untrue but have been repeated by right wing outlets but also the CFR 🤔

Image
Image
Image
2/ These media are focusing on these two infographics by the @ochaopt . The one on the left, published 6th May, the one on the right published 8th May. As you can see, total fatalities INCREASE, as opposed to decrease. What the propaganda is seaking to do is barely sophistry
Image
Image
3/All that's happening is the OCHA has added figures for the dead that have been identified. It quite clearly says that the breakdown DOES NOT include 10000 missing or buried under rubble. Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(