One week after the start of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, a personal reflection on the strangely disorienting experience of everyday normalcy in moments of world-historic importance - from the perspective of a citizen and a historian:
I want to be absolutely clear: Everything I say comes from an enormously lucky and privileged position of someone who is thousands of miles away from where the war is raging, who doesn’t have to worry about family or friends immediately affected by the invasion.
Obviously, how you’ve been experiencing these past few days will have been shaped, first and foremost, by how you are personally affected by what is going on in Ukraine. I am only trying to articulate a few thoughts from my individual perspective.
Even though I have not been immediately affected in any way physically or financially, nor has anyone in my immediate social environment, I have found it very hard to focus on anything but the situation in Ukraine and the question of what’s going to happen next.
I have been intensely – you might want to say: “obsessively” – following the news, trying to understand what is happening on the ground, to make sense of the complicated and often confusing information emanating from Ukraine, the reactions coming from around the world.
Some of that is my job: I’m a historian focusing on the very recent past, the immediate pre-history of the present, and specifically the recent history of democracy and its discontents in the U.S., the struggle for/against multiracial, pluralistic democracy in America and beyond.
That’s meant that I’ve been focusing on the reactions to the Russian invasion on the American Right, why conservatives in America have become infatuated with autocrats like Putin and Orbán, and how that is shaping their view of the war in Ukraine.
But my engagement with the war has gone well beyond the professional interest. I have spent an enormous amount of time following the events, and it has deeply affected me emotionally – I have been worried, sad, angry, hopeful, devastated… quite often all of it at once.
I want to acknowledge and emphasize that it’s crucially important, from a “Western” perspective, to critically reflect on why this particular war, and the suffering of people in Ukraine, might affected us more than events and suffering in other parts of the world.
It is of utmost importance to interrogate the many “Western” biases that can make us oblivious to the suffering by people who do not reflect our own image back at us. But that’s never to say “Care less about Ukraine” – it means “Try to care more about the rest of the world.”
In any case, it is certainly true that I have not gotten as much work done as I should have, and normally would have, over the past week. And I’ve seen people criticize that: “Stop doomscrolling and do something productive instead!” I disagree.
I know that the “Stop doomscrolling!” idea often comes from a place of sincere concern for the mental well-being of people who might be overwhelmed with a situation; and if “doing something productive” means “Find ways to help the people in need,” I’m fully on board.
But sometimes “Stop doomscrolling and do something productive” basically means: “Why are you obsessing over this far-away conflict – go do your actual work instead!” And with that I disagree and want to push back against. It’s ok, even important, to be deeply affected!
Let me be very clear: I don’t want to criticize anyone who, for whatever reason, has decided they cannot follow the situation in Ukraine closely. There can be many legitimate reasons for that – one of which is that it can indeed be psychologically / emotionally overwhelming.
I also understand that life doesn’t stop – we all have to compartmentalize, all the time. It is the great luxury people like me have right now, that our lives are not totally shattered by this war; but it also means we have to keep functioning in our daily lives. That’s fine.
But if you have been, like me, “obsessing” over the news, spending a lot of time engaging with the situation, have been affected in all sorts of ways: that’s not a waste of time, that’s not being “unproductive” – it’s being a citizen of the world, trying to understand the world.
It’s generally not a good idea to tell other people what they have a right or no right to be “upset” about – this type of “What do you care? Knock it off!” stuff is not helping anyone. And even from a more academic perspective, it seems weirdly ignorant in situations like this.
History, political science, sociology, name any other academic discipline: Whatever we are studying, teaching, researching, aren’t these all, first and foremost, different avenues to interrogate the world, in the hope of making sense of the world and our place in it?
I’m a historian. I’m convinced the specifically historical approach of interrogating the world, past and present, is distinctly valuable – and I’m sure others feel the same about their respective disciplines. But don’t we agree that’s what we’re doing: Interrogating the world?
If that’s *not* what we’re doing, interrogating the world in specific ways in the hope of gaining a better understanding of the world, then what’s even the point? Yes, it’s a job (or, if you are a student, it’s your education) – but isn’t it also driven by an underlying longing?
And if we agree that, at its core, our task is indeed to interrogate the world, then how could it possibly be “unproductive” to spend time trying to make sense of the world in such a moment of acute crisis, of world-historic significance?
Is that “unproductive”? I mean, sure, if you measure production solely by the number of publications, then I have certainly been less “productive” this past week. But I refuse to see my relationship with the world that way, and I won’t expect my students to do that either.
Not only is it entirely justified and legitimate to be affected by what is happening in Ukraine. It is also, from a more academic perspective, necessary to absorb, observe, reflect, discuss, in whatever form, for however long it takes to make sense of what is going on.
Not all of this reflection can be turned into publications down the road; some of it means you will have had less time to finish your assignments… It is what it is! Life has intervened, the world has intervened – and we need to adapt and adjust. And try to make sense of it.
I told my students this week they should take as much time as they need to engage with the situation in Ukraine, to reflect on what it all means, what might come next. I would define that as being very “productive.” It can’t always be about narrow definitions of “output.”
The world is really complicated and challenging, even for those of us like me who are extremely lucky to be where they are. And sometimes, in those “historic” moments, it becomes even more complicated and terrifying. Take your time to pause and reflect. We all should. We need to.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas Zimmer

Thomas Zimmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tzimmer_history

Mar 4
Conservatives may not like Putin - but they like multiracial, pluralistic democracy even less.

The Right’s infatuation with autocrats like Putin and Orbán is a reminder that the reactionary counter-mobilization is a transnational phenomenon.

My new column for @GuardianUS:
Right-wing reactions to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine range from openly siding with Putin to condemning him while agreeing with his critique of the weak, “woke” West. To the Right, the fight against multiracial pluralism overrides everything else.
The Right’s reactions have oscillated between blatant admiration for Putin and anti-Russian saber-rattling combined with a shrill critique of President Joe Biden. This goes well beyond Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson.
Read 18 tweets
Mar 2
Always remember that we have to think beyond the “red states vs blue states” binary. There are so many people in those red states like Texas who strongly oppose the white reactionary regime that’s being installed there, and suffer greatly from these authoritarian policies.
It’s not realistic to expect people to just move away. I’m sure a lot of young people, especially, will do exactly that. But it leaves those behind who aren’t able to uproot their entire existence – often precisely the people who will suffer most from white reactionary politics.
And even if, somehow, everyone who prefers multiracial, pluralistic democracy were to get out of these “red” states, leaving behind only those conservative white Christians who desire to be surrounded by people who reflect their own image back at them, it’d still be a disaster.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 1
I will add: The latest research on the history of modern U.S. conservatism and the American Right very much emphasizes the importance of domestic far-right extremist and fascistic traditions, and most serious historians agree that Trumpism needs to be situated in that context.
You haven’t been following these serious debates over Trumpism as fascism, are unaware of the state of the historical/political debate surrounding the American Right? Fine, no worries. But then why do you feel the need to opine publicly?
My own interpretation, by the way, is that the animating vision and ideology on the Right is best described as white Christian nationalism. Within that broader context, we need to acknowledge a domestic tradition of fascism / fascistic tendencies, and that’s where Trumpism falls.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 28
Crucial analysis by @RonBrownstein: The country is turning into a dysfunctional pseudo-democratic system nationally – and on the state level will be divided into democracy in one half of the states and authoritarian one-party rule in the other.

I’d like to add some thoughts:
Put differently, America will be divided into a multiracial, pluralistic “blue” part that accepts the country’s changing social, cultural, and demographic realities vs. a white Christian nationalist “red” part that is led by people entirely devoted to rolling back those changes.
From a liberal, blue-state perspective, it might be tempting to say: Well, let them! Let them ruin those states and turn them into reactionary backwaters! But that would be disastrous, and not just for the white Christian nationalists who are assaulting democracy.
Read 15 tweets
Feb 26
This is not some far-right internet troll, but a Republican state senator - and it’s impossible to adequately understand American politics without grappling in earnest with why her radicalism is widely seen as justified on the Right and within the GOP.
Every “Western” society harbors far-right extremists like Rogers who dream of committing acts of fascistic violence. But it’s the fact that the Republican Party embraces and elevates her, and others like her, that constitutes an acute danger to democracy.
Just ignoring this won’t work, because it’s not coming from some rightwing troll, but a Republican elected official who’s in good standing with the rest of her party. No use making fun of it either: These people are in positions of power, intent on using that power.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 26
Now that the President has nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson, I’d like to re-post my column on why Biden’s pledge to send a Black woman to the Supreme Court was so significant - and why conservatives are so furious even though it won’t change the balance of power on the Court:
This captures precisely why conservatives feel threatened by this nomination: They understand it symbolizes the recognition that having white men dominate the powerful institutions of American life is a problem that needs to be rectified.
Conservatives fear the acknowledgment that the country’s institutions should reflect the composition of the people; they understand that representation matters, that a Black woman ascending to a position like this is also an acknowledgment of past injustice.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(