🧵Thread 1/ OK, so we need to talk about Kevin (well, Steve Kevin)! Stand aside #TinderSwindler, meet the pro-Putin #TwitterSwindler. This is a thread about the wild crossover of romance scams & pro-Kremlin soc media propaganda
2/ Steve has it all. A doctor who specializes in elbows, knee, all the joints, and erm, low [sic] back. He obviously loves kids, adults and erm, 'teen'. Oh yeah, he also loves Putin, and despite being an American (methinks), his English ain't so hot.
4/ The eagle-eyed among you will notice that Steve Kevin's tribute to Putin garnered a lot of attention. 1231 likes, 226 RTs and 244 replies is nothing to scoff at.
6/ Indeed, apart from his recent diatribes against NATO (see below), his early tweets seem to be mostly about crypto ( 🙄🙄) . Scams or marketing, it's hard to tell.
7/ Well, a reverse image search is, erm revealing. It led me to a Polish facebook group about dating scams. Here we see someone using the same picture and multiple aliases, including Ray Chandler, Raymond Douglas, James Scooott, Frank Wilson, Steven Cooper...
8/ And there are more scam sites, and more names, Henderson Leighton, James John, Stuart Hallam. In fact the only name he hasn't used is probably Vladimir Putin.
9/ So what's going on? Well firstly it's still not clear who is in the original photo, but it's certainly not Steve 'low back' Kevin from Atlanta. I found his tweet by searching for tweets with high engagement on the 'i stand with Putin' hashtag. This is important because...
10/ a characteristic of the hashtag is that many of the most popular tweets are accounts with few followers, and few tweets - which is suspicious. Steve Kevin is just one of many impersonator 'fake' accounts that are promoting pro-Russian propaganda #UkraineRussianWar
11/ Who exactly is behind it is not clear. But the modus operandi appears to be for sock puppet/fake accounts/trolls (won't get bogged down in nomenclature) to promote tweets by these other fake accounts. The numbers are in the thousands. #UkraineRussianWar #disinformation
12/ I saw similar tactics in tweets promoting the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Mohammed bin Zayed. Literally thousands of booster bots and fake accounts. See here for more details
13/ So just remember. Steve Kevin is likely one of many thousands of fake accounts or sock puppets boosting 'I stand with Putin'. He's not really an elbow teen doctor.
1/ THREAD: On populist gaslighting and the war on truth-tellers 🧵
2/ Something concerning is happening in our information ecosystem: populists aren't just spreading misinfo, they're systematically trying to undermine the very concept of verifiable truth
3/ When fact-checkers or experts present evidence contradicting false claims, they get labeled as "elitist manipulators" or 'censors' - effectively inverting reality
🧵 THREAD: Meta's disturbing new "free speech" announcement is a masterclass in how platforms enable digital harm under the guise of freedom 1/9 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Meta announces it's getting rid of factcheckers & "restrictions" on gender/immigration content. This isn't about free speech - it's about platforming hate & disinformation under the guise of "mainstream discourse" 2/9
Key red flags: ❗️❗️❗️
Moving content teams to Texas "for less bias" (read: political motivation)
Replacing factcheckers with "community notes"
Framing basic content moderation as "censorship" 3/9
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.