@WGRZ/@TEGNA anchor Michael Wooten @wgrzMichael this week disclosed (and denied) a potential conflict of interest arising from the fact it was revealed @pfizer executive Lidia Fonseca sits on the board of @WGRZ owner @TEGNA.
I’d like to introduce a very important point to this discussion of @WGRZ’s potential conflict of interest: advertising.
Is @WGRZ and @TEGNA advertising the COVID-19 vaccine, specifically the Pfizer vaccine, in their coverage?
PRODUCT PLACEMENT: The practice of inserting branded products into programming in exchange for fees or other considerations.
CLASSIC PLACEMENT: merely requiring a shot of the product at some point during the program.
These screenshots were taken from a recent @WGRZ report that I urge you to watch. Not only are the images used disturbing and seemingly advertise the Pfizer vaccine product, the segment itself mimics recent Pfizer advertising campaigns.
“Prescription drug product placements do not provide onsumers adequate info about drugs side effects…”
“Consumer Deception.”
“Whose interests (news) content might be serving.”
Again, why does @WGRZ COVID-19 vaccine coverage look so much like embedded advertising?
I tried to find @WGRZ coverage of vaccine side effects.
Only 1 tweet was available that I found:
Published at 1 AM on Friday, September 17, 2021.
@WGRZ why do you fail to provide coverage of vaccine side effects, only to claim they don’t exist when you do?
@WGRZ why have you not covered the recent #pfizerdocuments#Pfizerdata that shows high numbers of both SAE’s and deaths following vaccination with Pfizer’s COVID vaccine? If these reports aren’t causally linked to vaccine, please have @VerifyThis do a story on the data.
The conflict of interest between @WGRZ@TEGNA and @pfizer and the foundations funding your fact-checking trainers extends far beyond @wgrzMichael and any of your other anchor-level journalists.
Failing to disclose connection to Pfizer is an extreme lack of candor.
1. @TEGNA’s link to Pfizer
2.) Hiring 501(c)3’s funded by vaccine investors to train your journalists how to counter vaccine misinformation
3.) Your segments on vaccines looking like advertisements
It’s incumbent on you as a station to disclose this information.
I’ll be expecting a complete answer to all of the above questions made publicly.
The global elite is upset the underclass of the world isn’t absorbing as many vaccines as they should
COVID vaccine supply for global programme outstrips demand for first time | Reuters reuters.com/business/healt…
Nobody is buying the vaccine story anymore, not even impoverished and/or illiterate African nation citizens
The warring departments of Western governments, however, have come to the rescue with this handbook for Africans attempting to persuade the vaccine hesitant they are actually demons and that’s why they won’t just take the damn shot
What am about to detail in this thread will show you exactly how the #MSM is the captive tool of companies and organizations like #Pfizer, used for the purposes of #vaccine#disinformation, suppression of the truth, and manufacturing consent for worldwide inoculation.
Until a couple days ago, it wasn’t common knowledge that @WGRZ parent company @TEGNA had a Pfizer executive on its Board of Directors. WGRZ anchor Michael Wooten has never disclosed this anywhere, nor has WGRZ.
Prior to Wooten retweeting me and attacking me on TV, we had several back and forth exchanges on Twitter, almost strictly regarding COVID origins, masks and vaccines.
I had no idea a Pfizer Executive Lidia Fonseca sat on the Board of the company that writes Wooten weekly checks.
Example of IMF/World Bank COVID vaccine coercion:
1.) Burundi refused COVID vaccines until mid-2021
2.) Country was under sanctions
3.) July 27, 2021 received $78m IMF loan
4.) July 29, 2021 concedes to accepting COVAX vaccines from World Bank