"Replacing the HRA would have negative consequences on people’s rights, incl disabled people, people living with long term conditions, unpaid carers, as well as people with other protected characteristics and from other marginalised groups."
"Any conversation about a UK Bill of Rights should be about increasing our rights - not undermining them or making it more difficult to hold UK Government to account."
"Mermaids and other LGBTQIA+ organisations are deeply concerned about the Government’s proposals, which could erode our rights to privacy, and diminish public bodies’ obligations to proactively protect our rights."
"We are very concerned about proposals that seek to limit human rights for particular groups. The
HRA is universal and applies to all. Limiting the rights of some people weakens human rights protection for all, and sets dangerous precedents."
Gov's plan could "remove the rights of people who have been in trouble with the law, reinforce poor treatment of racially minoritised people + victims of abuse + exploitation, + weaken safeguards against rights abuses in private prisons."
"We hope the Government will [...] abandon its plans which will gravely undermine the values of fairness, justice and equality which underpin our society."
"We join children’s rights alliances across the UK to express our widespread concerns as to the significant impact of the proposals on children. We propose that the HRA does not get repealed or replaced."
"Proposed changes will undermine fundamental support & protection for victims of modern slavery. Rather than tackling the causes of human trafficking & creating meaningful pathways out of exploitation, Gov is trying to evade accountability"
"BID's view is that the government’s proposals for reforming the Human Rights Act are incoherent, unnecessary, and would have the consequence of diminishing human rights protection in the UK."
"Far from supporting a culture of respect for human rights in the UK, these proposals are a power-grab by the UK Government which would decrease accountability of the state"
"The Human Rights Act is an essential tool that empowers ordinary people to challenge public bodies when they make harmful decisions, and
hold them to account... It's working effectively and there is no evidenced-based case to replace it."
"This proposal - together with Nationality & Borders Bill, and the Policing Bill - is a terrifying attempt by the UK government to divide people and communities by creating two types of citizens: deserving and undeserving citizens."
"Replacing the HRA with a new Bill of Rights would fundamentally reduce everyone’s access to their human rights, and this would particularly impact people who are most at risk of rights breaches."
"The Government is introducing changes that would make the state less accountable. This undermines a crucial element of the rule of law, preventing people from challenging illegitimate uses of power."
"We are extremely concerned that the proposals in this consultation will severely limit the ability of people in prison to seek redress when their human rights have been violated."
"Looking through the lens of Jewish religion, history, and values, we do not agree with the premise of this consultation. The Human Rights Act does not need replacing with a Bill of Rights. Indeed, the Human Rights Act is a Bill of Rights."
On the day the Government's #HumanRightsAct consultation closes, new polling shows the public reject Gov's agenda of attempting to make itself untouchable.
In a functioning democracy, people must be able to hold the powerful to account.
The #HumanRightsAct enables everyone in the UK to do just that and stand up for our rights when public authorities – like Gov + local councils – fall short.
The #HumanRightsAct protects us from misuse of power no matter who we are.
And it's helped bring a culture of respecting human rights into hospitals, schools, care homes, and housing associations – changing the way thousands of people are treated and supported.
On Monday the House of Lords can bin some of the most dangerous and discriminatory anti-protest measures in Gov's #PolicingBill.
🗳️Liberty's voting guide for Peers⬇️
The #PolicingBill allows police to put conditions on a protest if they reasonably believe the noise generated may seriously disrupt an organisation in the area or may "have a significant and relevant impact on persons in the vicinity".
This has to go.
Noise is - LITERALLY - how we make our voices heard.
Described by the Supreme Court as “a wrong turn”, joint enterprise is a proven route to injustice.
@JENGbA#JointEnterprise has led to bystanders being convicted of the most serious crimes, and is often used to criminalise Black men, young people and women.
Let's take a look at Gov's amendments to the dangerous and discriminatory #PolicingBill
🧵(brace yourself, it's long – dw it’ll be available in more manageable chunks soon)
You probably know all about the #PolicingBill's attack on protest rights by now. But if you're new to it, here's an explainer covering what the Bill looked like until very recently
We are deeply saddened and angered by the needless deaths of people trying to reach safety in the UK.
The continued loss of life in the Channel as well as in detention centres around the country are a direct result of the Government's racist #HostileEnvironment policies.
The answer can never be to ramp up toxic policies - which Gov's Nationality and Borders Bill (aka #AntiRefugeeBill) does by proposing pushbacks at sea and offshore 'processing' of asylum seekers.
And just this week Gov announced a new prison-like detention centre for women.