After spending the week at the #SXSWEDU conference I have some thoughts on what we’re doing with traditional academic conferences and what we could do to make them better.

A rambling thread while I’m at the bar after 8 hours of sessions🧵
FWIW to start, in my experience @improvingpsych has it most right.

They’re interactive, engaged, and have varied session formats.

But they are the outlier, not the norm.
In The Times Before The Internet™️ academic conferences served to expose people to new research results — useful!

But now? Academic conference sessions are only opportunities to add lines to a CV.

Why engage in a session when I can read the research you already posted online?
But NICOLE it’s about the networking! Yes, obviously. Just plan a group trip & do fun stuff then if it’s not about the research?!?

Oh bc we need cv lines? Boring. 😴

Our obsession with metrics in academia is expensive. Grad students spending 1000s for a line on a cv. Wtf.
#SXSWEDU instead has only a few standard “talk” sessions of 20 min. And these are for big impactful projects.

The rest are hour long panels where diverse education professionals are discussing key topics in education, creative practical workshops, and interactive roundtables.
#SXSWEDU has so many people from a variety of industries and roles. Academic conferences are a bunch of the same kind of people — researchers.

Get outside your box!

I’m interacting with researchers, presidents, higher ed, k12, tech founders, non-profits, teachers, etc.
Our standard academic conference is constrained by our hyper-focus on CV lines.

It’s why people find the sessions boring. Most don’t go to the talks and instead spend their time in the halls. It’s why many don’t love online conferences— bc it’s just hours of talks.
Let’s reimagine the academic conference. Let’s create programming that mimics our social interactions, brings diverse people and roles together. We can imagine better ways to share research that doesn’t just repeat what we already shared online.

Let’s innovate, not replicate.
- panel discussions on key topics
- bring in people that our research impacts & let them speak!
- brainstorming sessions
- poster roundtable sessions
- creative expression
- live podcast recording sessions
- collaborative activities

What else? Can we nix the 15 mintalk already?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicole Barbaro

Nicole Barbaro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicoleBarbaro

Feb 27
Last week I gave my first invited, hour long talk at a conference and had a strange new experience.

I wasn’t nervous before. No increase in heart rate. Just calm energy.

And it was the best talk I’ve given.

Not sure when the transition occurred, but I have some thoughts. 1/
In grad school we practice tons of research presentations at conferences and in classes. But despite all those presentations I still got nervous before every talk.

Looking back, I realized that a limitation of this practice was that it’s just one form of presentation. 2/
Practice of course matters, but more important are consistency and varied types of practice.

This variability is key and means that practicing only research tasks isn’t the most effective way to make you a better presenter. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Feb 17
Great question! What’s going on behind the scenes? I’ve been on the board of an academic society for 5+ years and hosted an online conference last year for 600 attendees.

Some insights as to what *might* be going on🧵
1. I presume most societies are paying a LOT for fancy conference app licensing fees, like Whova for instance. Especially with big conferences 1000+ people, this can get expensive. You’re also paying for labor of those that are monitoring for tech issues, customization, etc.
BUT there are amazing start-ups out there too! @HumBehEvoSoc used @ohyayco last year and we had an amazing experience and our members loved it.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 12
My intro development class I’m teaching starts tonight.

Already a few students are sick and can’t make it.

The pandemic has changed the structure of my (in person teaching).

Here’s how 🧵
1. My deadlines are soft.

All assignments have deadlines, but there’s no penalty to late submissions. Exams are still more strict but still soft as they are all take home now.

Honestly saves a lot of email hassle.
2.Exams are all take home.

I am fundamentally opposed to proctoring software, so now all my exams are take home essay or projects that can’t be googled.

Please don’t require spyware.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 11
This Month's #BookmarkedReads📚 curated reading list provides eight of my favorite books on US education. These books will collectively provide a foundation from which to expand your understanding of both K12 and #HigherEd.

🧵
bookmarkedreads.substack.com/p/educationboo… (affiliate links)
Best In Teaching

As the title suggests, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You about College Teaching by @dgooblar, teaches you everything you were never taught about college teaching.

Must read for educators in the classroom. amzn.to/3zNTpPN
Best in Learning Science

In How We Learn: Why Brains Learn Better Than Any Machine . . . for Now, Stanislas Dehaene explains four key pillars of learning that can be applied to how we teach and how learning environments are structured.

amzn.to/3GhQy49
Read 8 tweets
Dec 21, 2021
A 🧵of my hottest 🔥 takes of 2021 as indicated by views.

No. 1 – The Academic Publishing System is a Failure where I argue that academic publishing actively inhibits the dissemination of knowledge

nicolebarbaro.substack.com/p/failedjourna…
No. 2 – Introduction to Psychology with Better Readings where I give you a full reading list of popular books that are way better to read than your dated intro psych textbook

nicolebarbaro.substack.com/p/introbooks
No 3. – Not a hot take, but 10 🔥books that you should absolutely be reading.

bookmarkedreads.substack.com/p/interestingb…
Read 7 tweets
Dec 21, 2021
PhDs - if you’re not super into stats and data analysis and looking to shift to #altac/non-prof roles the skills you want to hone & excel at are:

- Writing (but not dense academic writing)
- Project management
- Strategic, big picture thinking

You have a leg up here ^^ use it.
Now two years out, I look on whether my PhD was “worth it”.

If only based on job requirements then no. Most roles I want don’t need a PhD.

BUT my PhD gave me the writing, PM & strategy skills I use everyday that will get me on a new path. So yes, it was worth it.
I did so many types of tasks during my PhD and it really is all about leveraging those things and being able to translate what you did for a new career audience.

Your PhD also gives you confidence and leadership skills that most just don’t have coming out of undergrad.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(