Great question! What’s going on behind the scenes? I’ve been on the board of an academic society for 5+ years and hosted an online conference last year for 600 attendees.
1. I presume most societies are paying a LOT for fancy conference app licensing fees, like Whova for instance. Especially with big conferences 1000+ people, this can get expensive. You’re also paying for labor of those that are monitoring for tech issues, customization, etc.
BUT there are amazing start-ups out there too! @HumBehEvoSoc used @ohyayco last year and we had an amazing experience and our members loved it.
2. Big societies have lots of costs. Societies like SPSP for example have actual staff salaries that they pay.
There are also website hosting costs, other tech to be paid for (eg. Mailing list programs) etc. registration fees pay for this.
BUT most conferences don’t actually make that much profit. Conferences can cost 100s of thousands of $$. Registration fees cover that plus a but extra.
3. Whats the extra go to? Subsidizing student travel, yearly grant funding awards, survey research by the society, etc. Many of the “perks” of membership are paid for by conference $$ surplus.
4. Now in 2022 HYBRID is the main desire.
Guess what folks: hybrid conferences are MORE EXPENSIVE to run than either in person only or online only.
So there needs to be a balance of registration to cover these extra costs. So online still $$
@HumBehEvoSoc (see pinned tweet) decided to do online only this year rather than hybrid bc it would have cost $100k to run a hybrid with fewer members in person. It was not feasible for us to do that as a smallish society.
In conclusion: online only is cheaper than in person but most society budgets assume revenue from conferences (and journal dividends) to operate in the way we all expect. Hybrid (for now at least) is more expensive.
Hope this helps explain why online is still costly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This Month's #BookmarkedReads📚 curated reading list provides eight of my favorite books on US education. These books will collectively provide a foundation from which to expand your understanding of both K12 and #HigherEd.
As the title suggests, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You about College Teaching by @dgooblar, teaches you everything you were never taught about college teaching.
In How We Learn: Why Brains Learn Better Than Any Machine . . . for Now, Stanislas Dehaene explains four key pillars of learning that can be applied to how we teach and how learning environments are structured.
No. 2 – Introduction to Psychology with Better Readings where I give you a full reading list of popular books that are way better to read than your dated intro psych textbook
PhDs - if you’re not super into stats and data analysis and looking to shift to #altac/non-prof roles the skills you want to hone & excel at are:
- Writing (but not dense academic writing)
- Project management
- Strategic, big picture thinking
You have a leg up here ^^ use it.
Now two years out, I look on whether my PhD was “worth it”.
If only based on job requirements then no. Most roles I want don’t need a PhD.
BUT my PhD gave me the writing, PM & strategy skills I use everyday that will get me on a new path. So yes, it was worth it.
I did so many types of tasks during my PhD and it really is all about leveraging those things and being able to translate what you did for a new career audience.
Your PhD also gives you confidence and leadership skills that most just don’t have coming out of undergrad.
I spoke to students and faculty at @AbertayUni about how we do #edtech research at WGU Labs, and advice for psychology PhDs looking to land an #altac role.
[THREAD] with pics, links to posts, and the full presentation at the end 👇🏼 1/
The #edtech industry has been on the rise since 2018, but #COVID19 has acted as a catalyst for online learning at scale in 2020. Edtech adoption by educators has been a huge output of this pandemic & all the more reason that our work at Labs is super relevant right now. 2/
However, there are some three key problems that I see with #edtech research👇🏼
Edtech research should focus IMO on enhancing core learning processes. I've talked about some of this here: nicolebarbaro.com/2020/06/16/usi… 3/
I saw this title and “thought this is so unlikely to be what the actual scientific paper said” and I was right. First things first – let’s look at the title of the actual paper, linked at the end of the article 2/
Well the article must at least talk about race and racism, right? Right?!