My intro development class I’m teaching starts tonight.
Already a few students are sick and can’t make it.
The pandemic has changed the structure of my (in person teaching).
Here’s how 🧵
1. My deadlines are soft.
All assignments have deadlines, but there’s no penalty to late submissions. Exams are still more strict but still soft as they are all take home now.
Honestly saves a lot of email hassle.
2.Exams are all take home.
I am fundamentally opposed to proctoring software, so now all my exams are take home essay or projects that can’t be googled.
Please don’t require spyware.
3.I build out my whole course on Canvas.
I used to use my LMS for posting papers, but now everything is on there - assignments, exams, info sheets - everything.
4.My class can be completed without ever showing up.
This makes me sad. I work hard to add value to students learning in class but I cant make my course dependent on it given covid.
The lecture rooms are recorded so hopefully student find value there.
Is this the future of education? The teacher is a curator (if that) rather than a relational person in the students learning? Learning is independent and “personalized”?
It seems that way from where I stand.
I’m looking forward to teaching this lecture course again (with 25% of class spent engaged in active learning), I just hope students show up when they can.
You can follow along too! All slides posted here across the term: osf.io/wn38a/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This Month's #BookmarkedReads📚 curated reading list provides eight of my favorite books on US education. These books will collectively provide a foundation from which to expand your understanding of both K12 and #HigherEd.
As the title suggests, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You about College Teaching by @dgooblar, teaches you everything you were never taught about college teaching.
In How We Learn: Why Brains Learn Better Than Any Machine . . . for Now, Stanislas Dehaene explains four key pillars of learning that can be applied to how we teach and how learning environments are structured.
No. 2 – Introduction to Psychology with Better Readings where I give you a full reading list of popular books that are way better to read than your dated intro psych textbook
PhDs - if you’re not super into stats and data analysis and looking to shift to #altac/non-prof roles the skills you want to hone & excel at are:
- Writing (but not dense academic writing)
- Project management
- Strategic, big picture thinking
You have a leg up here ^^ use it.
Now two years out, I look on whether my PhD was “worth it”.
If only based on job requirements then no. Most roles I want don’t need a PhD.
BUT my PhD gave me the writing, PM & strategy skills I use everyday that will get me on a new path. So yes, it was worth it.
I did so many types of tasks during my PhD and it really is all about leveraging those things and being able to translate what you did for a new career audience.
Your PhD also gives you confidence and leadership skills that most just don’t have coming out of undergrad.
I spoke to students and faculty at @AbertayUni about how we do #edtech research at WGU Labs, and advice for psychology PhDs looking to land an #altac role.
[THREAD] with pics, links to posts, and the full presentation at the end 👇🏼 1/
The #edtech industry has been on the rise since 2018, but #COVID19 has acted as a catalyst for online learning at scale in 2020. Edtech adoption by educators has been a huge output of this pandemic & all the more reason that our work at Labs is super relevant right now. 2/
However, there are some three key problems that I see with #edtech research👇🏼
Edtech research should focus IMO on enhancing core learning processes. I've talked about some of this here: nicolebarbaro.com/2020/06/16/usi… 3/
I saw this title and “thought this is so unlikely to be what the actual scientific paper said” and I was right. First things first – let’s look at the title of the actual paper, linked at the end of the article 2/
Well the article must at least talk about race and racism, right? Right?!
Juicy take on why replication attempts *really* fail: The phenomenon I studied was super complex and you probably didn't do something correctly.
2/
Their proposal is a(nother!) framework or "lens" to evaluate failed replications across 4 types of validity to identify the potential ways in which the replication study differed that could explain the failed replication.