The rapid increase in the number of children requiring support and the complex case-mix means that the current clinical model, with a single national provider, is not sustainable in the longer term. >>
"We need to know more about the population being referred and outcomes. There has not been routine and consistent data collection, which means it is not possible to accurately track the outcomes and pathways that children and young people take through the service. >>
"There is lack of consensus and open discussion about the nature of gender dysphoria and therefore about the appropriate clinical response. >>
"Because the specialist service has evolved rapidly and organically in response to demand, the clinical approach and overall service design has not been subjected to some of the normal quality controls that are typically applied when new or innovative treatments are introduced. >
Cass Interim Review continues with Key points – moving forward
"Children and young people with gender incongruence or dysphoria must receive the same standards of clinical care, assessment and treatment as every other child or young person accessing health services. >>
"The care of this group of children and young people is everyone’s business. Our initial work indicates that clinicians at all levels feel they have the transferable skills and commitment to support these children and young people, ...
but there needs to be agreement and guidance about the appropriate clinical assessment process that should take place at primary, secondary and tertiary level, underpinned by better data and evidence. >>
Addressing the challenges will require service transformation, with support offered at different levels of the health service.>>
The [Casss] Review’s research programme will not just build the evidence base in the UK but will also contribute to the global evidence base,...
... meaning that young people, their families, carers and the clinicians supporting them can make more informed decisions about the right path for them. >>
A fundamentally different service model is needed which is more in line with other paediatric provision, to provide timely and appropriate care for children and young people needing support around their gender identity. >>
This must include support for any other clinical presentations that they may have.>>
It is essential that these children and young people can access the same level of psychological and social support as any other child or young person in distress, from their first encounter with the NHS and at every level within the service.>>
The [Cass] Review team will work with NHS England, providers and the broader stakeholder community to further define the service model and workforce implications. >>
At this stage the [Cass] Review is not able to provide advice on the use of hormone treatments due to gaps in the evidence base. Recommendations will be developed as our research programme progresses."
Download the interim Cass report here cass.independent-review.uk/publications/i…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good afternoon and welcome back to DAY 5 of #ForstaterTribunal, the case of Forstater Vs CGD.
I'm @Wommando and we're due to start at 2pm where Maya Forstater will continue to give her evidence. Catch up with this morning here:
Welcome back to Day 4 of #ForstaterTribunal, the case of Forstater v CGD. We will be resuming with Claimant Maya Forstater giving her evidence at 2pm. Catch up with this morning here:
Good morning and welcome to Day 4 of #ForstaterTribunal, the case of Maya Forstater v CGD.
I'm @wommando live tweeting and we're expecting to begin with reporting instructions from the clerk. Catch up with yesterday here:
Maya Forstater (MF) & her counsel Ben Cooper QC (BC), assisted by Anya Palmer (AP)
The respondents: CGD Europe (CGDE), (CGD), & Masood Ahmed (MA), President of CGD.
Counsel for respondents is Olivia Dobbie (OD), Cloisters.
EJ: Employment Judge
P: Panel member
EJ: good morning we don't have our clerk so I will give brief instructions. It's is an offence contrary to contempt of court act to record or screenshot but it doesn't stop reporting of the proceedings.
OD: really, I do disagree, even in respect to the evidence BC refers to. There's nothing wrong with these individuals saying they were fundraising as there were many others.
BC points EJ to the document
BC: were now on draft 4 as OD as on the hoof redrafted it
EJ: is there any life left in the original application? Is there any use to the original application which seeks to not publish names and emails
OD: I take BC's point about rewording and I apologise there have been various iterations and BC shouldn't suggest that's improper. The new doc doesn't stop people reporting the fundraising activities but will protect their privacy
Maya Forstater (MF) & her counsel Ben Cooper QC (BC), assisted by Anya Palmer (AP)
The respondents: CGD Europe (CGDE), (CGD), & Masood Ahmed (MA), President of CGD.
Counsel for respondents is Olivia Dobbie (OD), Cloisters.
EJ: Employment Judge
P: Panel member
As is the case with live tweeting and the lightening speed we must go, undoubtedly there will be typos, and they will be rectified at the end of the day. We thank you for your support in our efforts of bringing you #OpenJustice. We're here and ready to go at 10am.