Time to combat some serious misinformation in this article.

thehill.com/opinion/techno…

1/16
Let's start with the author, Bruce L Davidson @bldmdmph

Apparently, good tooth brushing and mouthwash are underused resources to fight COVID. Is there any real evidence for this?

2/16

How did he get membership to ASHRAE? Between being a doctor, MPH with specialty in pulmonary medicine and associate prof, he got an engineering degree with 12 years HVAC experience? It's not listed anywhere. (I'm an associate member because I only have 11 years experience).

3/16
Now onto the misinformation:

1. HVAC upgrades are noisy and windy

In future posts, I will deal with switching to a dedicated outdoor air system, but putting 1000 CFM into classrooms is common and not noisy or windy.

4/16
Removing the recirculation gives you about 7 air changes per hour - up from 2-3 air changes.

5/16
2. "Filtering air after it leaves the room does zero to prevent transmission to people sitting in a room with someone repeatedly exhaling viruses. "

Filtering air takes air with viruses and removes them. It's basic physics.

nature.com/articles/d4158…

6/16
3. "High-efficiency particulate air filters — HEPA filters can remove 99.7 percent of particles larger than 0.3 microns...coronavirus and the flu virus are both 0.2 microns or smaller. "

The naked virus myth. It's not true.

See this post:


7/16
4. "Ventilation and filtration advocates are now promoting even less efficient filters, (MERV-13) that are only 66 percent effective "

You don't care about filter efficiency. You care about the clean air delivery rate = efficiency x flow.

9/16
5. "A 9,000 cubic feet classroom requires 10 cubic feet per minute (CFM) of fresh outside air per occupant. That’s 300 CFM..."

He must not have read 62.1. Here's how you actually do a ventilation requirement calculation:

ashrae.org/technical-reso…

10/16
You calculate it based on occupancy & area
9000 cubic ft room with 9' ceilings = 1000 sq ft area (bigger than most classrooms)

Outdoor air = 10 CFM/person * 30 ppl + 0.12 CFM/sq ft * 1000 sq ft = 420 CFM

If heating is required, you multiply by 1.25 = 525 CFM

11/16
He's only off by 75% when discussing how to mitigate virus transmission. No big deal.

6. "...recommended 6 to 12 air changes per hour for minimal disinfection, multiply that 900 CFM by three to reach the minimum of 6 ACH and arrive at 2,700 CFM."

12/16
He's right it's difficult to achieve 6 ACH alone with a recirc system. You can get 2.5 to 3 ACH easily. Add MERV 13 and that adds an extra 2.5. CR box gives you another 2. Or, you can use a dedicated outdoor air system and get 7 ACH easily.

13/16
He then goes on to praise upper room UVGI which is correct. It's better for mitigating virus transmission alone.

But the discussion about ventilation and filtration is bogus nonsense and should be removed.

14/16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joey Fox, P. Eng, M.A.Sc

Joey Fox, P. Eng, M.A.Sc Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joeyfox85

Mar 11
I'm in the @TorontoStar ! Thank you @bcohenn .

#COVIDisAirborne

Also featuring @FurnessColin & @ApricotTreeCaf1

Quotes below. 🧵👇

thestar.com/news/gta/2022/…
- Not enough focus on ventilation and filtration.
- Delay in acknowledging COVID is airborne
- Lack of clear communication
- Ventilation reduces risk of transmission Image
- look for HEPA filters and places with CO2 levels < 800 ppm
- We need operation warp speed for clean indoor air. I credited @j_g_allen for this in the interview.

(I don't believe "people will die from other respiratory viruses" was my quote)

Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 11
Intro to the Packaged Roof Top Unit (RTU)

I want to do a few tweets about common ventilation issues, but first I need to do an intro to the basic system - the RTU. It's essentially a home furnace with dampers. Here's what they look like:

1/14 ImageImageImage
This is a schematic of what it looks like inside. Here are the steps:

1. Air is returned from the space into the unit.
2. The exhaust damper - air leaves here. It's usually a backdraft damper. Air can only flow out and not in. It isn't motorized.

2/14 Image
3. The mixed air dampers/economizer - these control the ventilation. When they are "open", it means the outdoor air damper is open and the return air damper is closed. This brings in 100% outdoor air. The return damper closing forces the air out through the exhaust damper.

3/14 Image
Read 14 tweets
Mar 9
The new normal must be extreme airborne mitigation everywhere. Air quality experts need to be front and center. Imagine we had a new measles virus that caused brain damage and vaccines and natural immunity did not prevent infection.

1/3
HVAC mechanical engineers (who are responsible for ventilation) have a basic understanding of air quality, but know very little about airborne virus mitigation. The last virus people assumed was airborne was the measles and that hasn't been a societal threat since the '60s.

2/3
Most are unaware that electronic air cleaning doesn't work. Almost none have ever heard of upper room UVGI. We need indoor air quality standards. Air quality experts need to lead the way. Failing to emphasize that #COVIDisAirborne is preventing that.

3/3
Read 4 tweets
Mar 6
Here's my number: 87.5%

That's how much of a reduction in COVID spread can be achieved through:

- 6 air changes per hour (ACH) of ventilation +
- Upper room UVGI +
- #CorsiRosenthalBox .

No mandates required.

Where did that number come from?

1/5
75% reduction in transmission of measles from upper room UVGI. 25% remains.

2/5
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
50% reduction in transmission of measles from ventilation/filtration. 50% of these remain.

3/5

Read 5 tweets
Mar 3
Why a vaccine only approach is a bad idea:

I'm amazed that this concept exists. It's as if some doctors have pledged eternal loyalty to the vaccine and any additional measures are a form of adultery. It's absurd. Stop encroaching on engineering.

1/9
An engineer's perspective:
a. Especially with boost, vaccines are extremely effective against severe disease.
b. They are not effective long-term in preventing infection.

Because of this, many have said that only severe disease matters. It's not true. Here's why:

2/9
1. We've tried using a vaccine only approach. It's failed in every country that attempted it.
2. What about the immunocompromised, elderly and unvaccinated?
3. A vaccine only approach causes people to blame the pandemic on the unvaccinated. This can't continue.

3/9
Read 10 tweets
Mar 1
Intro to ultraviolet light against COVID 🧵

Ultraviolet light has many different applications. Here are 6 that have been used for COVID:

1. In-duct
2. Stand-alone
3. Upper Room
4. Far UV
5. Surface Sterilization
6. Photocatalytic Oxidation

TL;DR - See tweet 16 👇

1/20
1. In-Duct

A UV light is placed in the duct or by the coil of an air handling unit. It will kill virus particles being supplied to the zone.

I'm not in favor:
a. It can damage the filters
b. Better alternatives are: increasing outdoor air % and improving filtration.

2/20
c. Transmission through ducts is long range transmission. Shared room transmission is much higher risk. Better to focus on higher risk.
d. People in the industry have expressed skepticism to me of how
effective this actually is.
e. UV is more expensive than filtration.

3/20
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(