In a nutshell, cutting the elite off from the West deprives them of power, turning them from “the protected constituents of a powerful political system” into “expendable salarymen and managers”, cementing a system in which the elite serve Putin, rather than the other way around.
While I’m not arguing that a palace coup is likely, if there are any circumstances that might lead to one, these are they.
But Russia’s high and mighty aren’t the only erstwhile friends of Putin who didn’t exactly sign up for (relative) penury and pariah status.
Russia’s partners in the Eurasian Economic Union — Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan — now find themselves locked in a customs union with a country seemingly hell-bent on isolating its economy from the richest countries in the world.
The currencies Russia's EEU partners have been hard hit by the war -- much harder than those who have remained outside of the bloc.
Now, Putin may be calculating that the role he has played in propping up Pashinyan, Lukashenka and Tokayev will keep them at bay, and he may be right. But those leaders have their own elites and publics to keep at bay, and that may not prove so simple.
All of Russia’s EEU partners have been roiled in recent years by economically driven protest movements, often with the participation of powerful elites. With Russian troops and riot police tied up in Ukraine and at home, there are only so many fires Putin can fight.
To be absolutely clear, the victims of this war are in and increasingly around Ukraine. More than 2 million refugees and countless more displaced, bombarded and besieged.
Tens of millions of people — an entire nation — deprived of the peace and security that are their right. Numbers of innocent victims that we have not yet begun to count.
But with enough support, Ukraine can win this war and its aftermath. The Kremlin and its friends cannot.
Russia’s president once sat atop a system of political and economic governance and a network of diplomatic, trading and investment relationships that, together, transformed Russia’s influence and his own into a truly global phenomenon. All of that is now undone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Longer answer: What you think you know is probably wrong.
(A quick 🧵)
If you're following the news, you've probably seen polls suggesting that ~60% of Russians support the war. That's problematic, for a number of reasons, which I'll try to explain here.
First things first: there's an excellent piece on this in @meduzaproject by @abessudnv (in Russian).
Vladimir Putin is increasingly fighting two wars: one in Ukraine, and one at home.
A week in, neither is going terribly well.
(A 🧵, in case that wasn't obvious.)
A summary of key points follow below. For the full story in a less cacophonous setting, see the latest TL;DRussia, which dropped yesterday. (And subscribe -- it's free!)
First, as @LawDavF has explained, Russia's invasion isn't going according to plan, and while Russia can still achieve its military objectives, it will come at an increasing cost.
So, as always, mixed signals, with basically two avenues of interpretation: either things are about to get better, or they're about to get a lot worse.
Here's what we know. The Russians and Ukrainians met, talked at some length, released very similar statements confirming that talks would continue, and returned to Moscow and Kyiv for consultations.
But that's only half the story. The other half is that Kharkiv came in for the most brutal air and artillery assault of the war to date (as best I can tell), attacks on Kyiv renewed, and Russia continued to mass troops and equipment outside the capital.
Anti-war protests in Russia do not appear to be waning. Per @OvdInfo, a further 2700 arrests today in 51 cities, bringing the total number of arrests since the invasion to nearly 6k.
Protests appear smaller than the Jan/Feb 2021 protests around Navalny’s arrest, but maybe not by much (good numbers are hard to come by). And the more frequently we see scenes like 👇, the bigger they’ll get.
The real question, though, is when scenes like the one above begin to interact with scenes like the one below, where people queue to get money out of their bank accounts:
Question for those who actually understand these things: @LawDavF@james_acton32@CameronJJJ@KofmanMichael — When Putin orders nuclear forces on “special preparedness”, what does that mean in practice? And what impact does that have on the posture of US forces?
The rhetoric is one thing — and entirely subject to interpretation. But presumably these sorts of orders also have a technical side to them, which can have its own consequences. Trying to understand that.
Apologies if you’ve written about this already and I’ve not been able to find it.
I’m not here to supplant the analysis of military experts: if you want to understand the ins and outs of the war, and of how Russia fights wars, follow @KofmanMichael@RALee85@LawDavF and others. But let me take a moment for a bit of politics.
When Putin announced the war, he talked about the invasion in the same breath as Russia’s wars in Chechnya and Syria. As @KofmanMichael mentions in the thread above, those wars were brutal. That’s one of the things that was so frightening about the possibility of war in Ukraine.