I don't know Mark Goldsmith very well. I have only been in Revolution Medicine about a year. That isn't a lot time to really know a management team. So far, I think he has done and excellent job.
2/ All their programs are still very early so it is hard to see how well they will navigate the regulatory and commercial parts of the business at this stage.
3/ Science:
This company is fully focused on the intracellular pathways that drive cell growth like the MAPK and mTOR pathways. They have their pipeline broken down into 2 parts. The first is all their RAS based inhibitors. The second half is RAS companion inhibitors.
4/ There are a lot of feed back mechanisms for RAS that allow it to rebound when inhibited. Finding companion inhibitors to help shut that down will be critical for future targeted therapies. Around half of all cancers have some kind of RAS mutation which makes it a huge prize.
5/ They have multiple RAS and KRAS inhibitors with their RAS multi being one of the most interesting. If it works, it will address multiple mutations of KRAS with on drug. They also have multiple KRAS specific inhibitors in development for KRAS G12C, G12D and G13C.
6/ Their companion inhibitors include a SHP2, SOS1 and 4EBP1 inhibitor. Their SHP2 is in phase 2 and partnered 50/50 with Sanofi. I love their approach to taking on this key oncology driver and multi faceted approach.
7/ Potential:
The potential for KRAS variants alone could be worth $1.5 billion in KRAS G12C, another $1.5 billion in KRAS G12D and then more for the smaller variants across KRAS 12, 13 and 61 mutations.
8/ Their companion inhibitors can also contribute to revenues based on how well they combo with other oncology therapies. Right now they have SHP2 in combo with KRAS and PD1 therapies. I think they could add at least $1 billion or more per target if they do work out.
9/ This company could have a ton of potential if their RAS on approach proves to be superior to the first generation RAS off inhibitors.
10/ Valuation:
This company seems super cheap at only $1.49 billion with over $577 million in cash. They burned just under $200 million in 2021 which gives them at least 2 years of cash.
11/ You are paying less then $1 billion for a company that could turn into many fold that level of revenues in 10 years. Its still very early stage, but they do have some success so far with SHP2.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have been in C4 Therapeutic for about 8 months now. I don't know the CEO Andrew Hirsch all that well. He seems to be doing good so far. The biggest issue I have is with the high level of risk in their strategy.
2/ They are highly focused on using Protein Degraders in already very proven indications and targets. This means they will have to show strong superiority over current therapies on efficacy or safety to really stand of chance of capturing any market share.
I have been in Arvinas about 9 months, and I am still undecided about John Houston. I don't like the idea they started in ER and AR which are highly competitive spaces.
2/ Their best programs have been sitting in the preclinic for years going nowhere. They fall further and further behind in those best indications like tau or KRAS. I am still hopeful they will impress me someday.
I have been in Kymera for about 9 months now. I think Nello Mainolfi has done a good job so far. Its still early stages so don't know how well he will navigate the regulatory and commercial aspects of the business.
2/ Science:
Kymera is working on Targeted Protein Degradation. This uses the Proteasome of the cell to target and breakdown unwanted proteins. This can be harnessed to target proteins that can be therapeutic to inhibit.
Mirati is one of my older holdings along with Blueprint. They were lead by founder and scientist Charles Baum. I think he did a really good job developing the company up to this point.
2/ He created Sitravatinib and in-licensed Adagrasib for KRAS G12C. Recently, they changed management by moving Baum to Chief of Research. They brought in David Meek as the new CEO to take them into the commercial phase of development.
Blueprint is one of my oldest holdings. They have an outstanding CEO with Jeff Albers. Recently, they announced the CEO transition to Kate Haviland. Jeff will move to the Chairman role.
2/ Any time there is a CEO transition, there is reason for concern. I have been in companies before that were very successful under one CEO and then it was all down hill after the CEO changed.
I have been a bit cautious on the management of Schrodinger. I think Ramy Farid is a software guy and doing a good job with the software business. I don't own the company because of the software as I don't believe it will be that big of a business.
2/ I do see what the software could do for the company with its own drug discovery business. I think Karen Akinsanya is doing an excellent job on the biotech side of things.