Lack of knowledge of the law is a serious thing. The person who assaulted @Belstaffie accepted a caution. This means they admitted they had committed an assault. This will be on the Police National Computer and will build up solid picture of patterns of criminal behaviour.
You would not know this from the comments of their supporters however. These people are not being good friends to this assailant. Encouraging and empowering people to think physical attacks are noble and necessary, leads no where good.
If the police continue to investigate women for stickering, they need to give the attention these physical assaults deserve. Because there is your ‘escalation’.
And it’s clear the assailant shows no remorse, thinks it’s funny and is highly likely to repeat the behaviour - indeed already has interactions with the police.
I have often said that a woman will have to die before this kind of male violence is taken seriously. But how naive and stupid am I! Women have been dying at hands of men at a staggering rate for many years and official attitudes to our protection are now going backwards.
The next time this assailant attacks a woman, there had better be some response that reflects the seriousness of this repeated behaviour of violence and denigration. Not only are more watching now, more are willing to speak up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well done @MForstater for revealing exactly what is going on. It is now for others to ask themselves if this is a road that it is safe to go down - where one group’s assertions about reality define it for everyone else
This is a serious question requiring serious thought. Because the amount of energy and time you will need to spend dealing with those who reject one conception of ‘reality’ will be immense. There will be many court cases.
And you wont be able to confine this approach to simply issues around ‘gender identity’. Those to whom you give the power to redefine reality will use it. For any issue they wish. Poster refers to @MForstater as ‘Sue’ - assume means ‘she’ but who knows any more?
And here we have it. To challenge another’s identity is to render them a ‘corpse’ - without YOUR compelled belief in their ‘identity’ they cannot even live.
When did this start being pushed as a sensible way for anyone to engage with the world?
And so we inch towards understanding. Bringing in discussion of Rachel Dolezal ‘offensive’ - presumably because many are not yet ready to concede ‘trans racialism’.
When objecting to yet another EDI questionnaire that requested I inform it whether my gender now was the same as the one I was assigned at birth, I replied that this was as offensive as asking me if my disability was assigned at birth.
It is positive that includes the history of a girl who realised that ‘becoming’ a boy would not automatically ‘fix’ anything. But terrifying that she has been told and believes you can just switch back and forth at will.
This child who likes wearing trousers and having short hair, wants surgery to confirm a ‘non binary’ identify. As child has female body, assume this means a double mastectomy. There is no coming back from that.
Many people seem to have this problem. Let's give one example - the Kimberly Nixon case. Whose rights should prevail? the male bodied person who wished to be a rape counsellor? Or the female bodied victims who said no?
Amazingly, the women won that case. Their rights to dignity prevailed against the rights of a male bodied person to be validated. Whether you agree with the outcome or not, there is no doubt that this is a prime example of how asserting one right diminishes another.
Let me give you another example. I don't have the right to sit anywhere I like on a plane because I am physically disabled. I would risk impeding the exit of others if I sat by the emergency exits.
About to start. I am glad we are - at last - able to have these conversations. There is nothing dangerous or unsatisfying about being closer to the truth.
People from all over the world are joining the webinar. Simultaneous Spanish translation. Not only is detrans a huge part of the trans narrative, they are much maligned. Now 26k on sub Reddit.
Stella was told that detransitioners were ‘vanishingly small’ part of the community. Very important that we hear their voices. The detransitioners created this day.