2/ So first up. A core component of the biolabs story was a key piece of disinfo.
Remember, for a good conspiracy, it helps to have scandal and perceived nefarious behaviour. It's especially good if you can make it look like your adversary is hiding something!
How though?
3/ Well it was fairly simple. It was reported by 'investigative journalist' @dgaytandzhieva around 26th Feb that the US Embassy in Kyiv had deleted documents about its biolaboratories in Ukraine.
4/ As I have said before, this is false. The documents were never deleted. Furthermore the screenshot used by Dilyana saying 'site can't be reached' appears not to be related to the Embassy webpage. In sum, this new was false, but it went viral. +12k RTs! #Ukraine#disinformation
5/ (Incidentally, when I first mentioned this Dilyana blocked me and did not qualify or delete her tweet.) Which at the very least seems unprofessional, at the most, suspicious
6/ After Dilyana tweeted this, a number of others picked it up.
@kylenabecker blogged it March 7, saying DoD were trying to 'hide' documents
@SpokespersonCHN Chinese Assistant Minister of Foreign Affairs - March 9
7/ Below you can see how the Twitter activity has evolved over the past two weeks. Dilyana (green) is initially the main influencer of this trend, then @SpokespersonCHN picks it up (orange), then most recently @zlj517 . This resulted in tens of thousands of likes/RTs
8/ I singled out these names because they are the most influential voices amplifying this conspiracy, which has also been a key point in appealing to the likes of QAnon. You can see the RT networks below
But they are not the only Chinese officials amplifying it
9/ Despite the fact the story was debunked days ago, some officials are still spreading it. E.g. The Chinese Consul General in Belfast has also repeated it, as has the Chinese Consul in Lebanon (today!)- at least in English, not sure about other languages.
10/ So regardless of veracity, the story is still going on. This 'what is the US trying to hide' narrative (see below) is explicitly being used to bolster the conspiratorial nature of the story, & a lot of the most influential people spreading it in English are Chinese diplomats
11 / So TLDR is; Chinese diplomats, who, like most diplomats, rarely stray from an official line, are demonstrably propagating a fake story popularized by an unaffiliated pro-Russian journalist, and fueling the biolab conspiracy. #UkraineRussiaWar #disinformation
12/ Some notes, this analysis involved around 7600 interactions on Twitter involving around 6700 unique accounts, mostly sent between 5-14th March. That's it for now. Peace
13/ oh yes, this is the link to the US Embassy in Kyiv where you can see all the 'deleted' documents ua.usembassy.gov/embassy/kyiv/s…
14/ interesting that links may have been down for an unspecified amount of time. Of course doesn't explain failure to correct narrative or cease it on the part of those involved
15/ Thanks @NadineNonny for pointing this out. Chinese state media is also spreading the deleted documents story in Arabic - group has over 15million likes
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection
73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.
Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week