There's two scenarios to consider. One, the "happy" path, is that there's been some miscommunication. Everyone actually wants whats best, its just that someone is overwhelmed. This scenario can be fixed! 2/
The second, the "bad" path, is that someone is attempting to emotionally manipulate the situation. However, you don't actually know "who" the impostor is yet. Using divide and conquer tactics, you may be fighting with a potential ally! 3/
Some "puppet master" behind the scenes may be trying to set folks who'd otherwise work together against each other. Again, we've seen this on the world stage recently. It's not as far fetched as it sounds. 4/
How do you deal with all these varieties of situations you may be in? Using the same thing, in every case. There's a nash equilibrium (best strategy) here no matter what situation or players you find yourself in! 5/
The first is to grey rock. Do not escalate your own emotions, do not escalate your tone of voice. Be like a rock. 6/ medicalnewstoday.com/articles/grey-…
This works because: if you're talking to someone who wants whats best, it will help them de-escalate. If you're talking to someone who's toxic, you'll deny them future ammunition to use against you. "That guy is a loose cannon!" It also frustrates the hell out of them 7/
The second is "assume best intent." BUT ONLY AT FIRST! And it MUST be combined with the third: document, document, document. 8/
Again, if there's a simple misunderstanding, assuming best intent allows folks to find a way forward. That's good. If there's toxic manipulation, assuming best intent ALONG WITH DOCUMENTATION allows you to prove to your superiors you were "good" 9/
If you have to escalate, it's because you're dealing with a toxic person. The documentation isn't to PROVE the person is toxic - it's to PROVE you did everything you could think of to do. 10/
By the time you escalate, you need to start switching tactics to deal with known toxicity. Remember: solidarity, accountability, and power. More on those another time!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Jean-Paul Sartre was a French Philosopher, literary critic, and fighter in the french resistance. He also spoke a lot on bad Agile roll-outs, although he didn't realize he was doing so at the time. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Paul… 2/
One of Sartre's points is about "bad faith" and it's opposition to living "authentically." Bad faith, to Sartre, was basically executing life in a hollow, pro-forma way. We use the term today to talk about when people are making arguments they don't truly believe. 3/