After the USSR fell, there was no accounting for the Soviet horrors committed, no lustration or truth commissions. Do not prepare only for The Hague war crime trials of Putin's officials after this war, but for every Russian to know these stories.
Despite being utterly defeated in the Cold War & the myth of Russian humiliation popularized by Putin & his propagandists, Russia was invited to join the civilized world, aided and with its pride as a once-great power indulged. It was a huge mistake, the original sin.
Instead of deprogramming generations of Russians and ripping out the security service structure root and branch, it was allowed to lurk in the shadows until Putin & his backers seized their chance. It cannot happen again.
After over 20 years of revanchism and exploitation, Russian patriotism is a perverse disease, an anti-Russian fascism called Putinism. It must be confronted and destroyed so Russians and Russia can safely join the civilized world.
I have always said that Putin's elite's looted wealth in the West should be seized and held in trust to rebuild a democratic Russia. Now it must go to rebuilding Ukraine first. Stolen money and stolen lives.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imagine how the Ukrainians feel about it! They don’t understand why the West is doing so little despite appeasing and funding their invader for eight years. They have little confidence the world will stay engaged as Putin’s war continues.
Finally sending arms is better than nothing, but does the West want to save the free world from tyranny or just be Amazon Prime for Lockheed? They encouraged this war by refusing to take risks to stop Putin in 2014. Now they’re doing it again.
Most of the arguments for letting Putin own Ukraine preemptively begin from “we must never engage Russian forces” and work backwards. Work forward from Ukraine being a sovereign nation you said you’d protect, fighting for values you claim to represent.
Were the RAND "experts" who wrote this in Foreign Policy on Jan 21 advising the White House? Are they still doing it? "The Ukrainian military... poses little deterrent threat to Russia; provision of U.S. weapons can do nothing to change that."
Is this sort of analysis the reason the US declined to arm the hell out of Ukraine to deter Putin's invasion and prepare for it, despite their own intel saying it was definitely going to happen? Instead, they waited until tanks were rolling & still lagged behind Europe.
It jibes with how the WH seemed to be looking forward a rapid UKR defeat, moving directly to its comfort zone of negotiating with a new Putin puppet ruler in Ukraine as he consolidated control & liquidated opposition as in E Ukraine.
More mixed signals from the Biden admin. Are they trying to confuse Putin or are they confused themselves? Blinken says sanctions not permanent. Russia still active in Iran deal. Then Biden calls Putin a war criminal. Action needed, not words.
My questions: What about Crimea & Donbas? What if Putin signs the papers but doesn't really leave, as in Georgia? What about reparations to Ukraine? Why make deals with a war criminal you know you cannot trust?
Is the US is declining to send its best weapons to Ukraine immediately in order to avoid the total destruction of Putin's forces in Ukraine, which would jeopardize the White House's higher priority of the Iran deal? If not, what is the reason?
This is it. All the things America still says it stands for–independence, democracy, self-determination–Ukraine is fighting to survive to defend them against a dictator who wants to destroy them everywhere.
The UN has become a platform for dictators. The EU & NATO stand by. As Zelensky says, a coalition of democracies is needed, as John McCain and I proposed many years ago. Putin's war on Ukraine is the start of a new global order, but it must not be the one he wants.
Ukraine is the hot war on the front line of this war on values Zelensky talks about. But it is happening all over the world. The free world forgot how to fight, how to care, thought it didn't need to anymore. It was wrong and it must remember.
Putin's war on Ukraine will either be the catalyst that revives the spirit & credibility of NATO or the end of the global order. As the Korean War shaped NATO after its birth under Harry Truman's vision of containing Communism, this is democracy vs authoritarianism. 1/13
Retreating from Putin to hide behind a piece of paper is too familiar to Ukrainians . The 1994 Budapest Memorandum promised Ukraine's territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal. USA & UK rushed to deny it was a guarantee when Putin invaded in 2014. 2/13
As with NATO today, lack of contractual obligation does not equal prohibition nor a lack of moral and strategic necessity. It's about political will and the choices of leaders. The refusal to defend Ukraine in 2014 led directly to Putin's escalation now. 3/13
An example of short-term thinking in the free world, focusing only on what happens NOW instead of planning for next year & the next generation. Had a policy of "dictatorship replacement" started 8 years ago, think of how different things would be now. Stop panicking and plan.
Instead of institutional consistency and strategy, the US & EU look only at the next poll. Any solution that won't pay immediate dividends on social media or by the next election is discarded. Germany discarding its nuclear plants for Russian gas, etc.
This frequently fails despite the massive power advantage the West has because dictatorships can move quickly. Putin doesn't care about a Congress or public opinion. Democracies must debate, process, pass laws.