Tweet

More from @HansMahncke

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Mar 19

"Now that the Washington establishment’s denial of the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s emails has been removed, the implications resulting from those emails demand serious answers regarding questions that Joe Biden has been compromised by his past dealings."theepochtimes.com/the-foreign-po…

"After the appointment of a special counsel and the forced recusal of Trump’s attorney general for a scandal fabricated by the Clinton campaign, how is it that no special counsel has been appointed in relation to the ongoing investigation into the Biden family?"

"Crucially, in light of the many implications from the validation of Hunter Biden’s emails and Joe Biden’s now-proven entanglements with Ukraine, how can he, as president of the United States, be entrusted to make foreign policy decisions regarding the Ukraine-Russia conflict?"

Read 4 tweets

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Mar 4

@themarketswork

"How top U.S. officials played key roles in destabilizing Ukraine and damaging U.S.-Russia relations"

New from @themarketswork and myself.

theepochtimes.com/before-russias…

2/ The deterioration relations with Russia started with President George W. Bush in 2008 when he dangled before Ukraine the promise of NATO membership during the Bucharest declaration, boldly claiming, “We agreed today that these countries will become members of NATO.”

3/ In 1990, U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher promised the Kremlin not to expand NATO eastwards in return for German unification. However, since then, NATO has incorporated 14 additional Eastern European countries.

Read 19 tweets

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Mar 4

New Durham filing:

"The defendant [Sussmann] further claimed that these lookups demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using a type of Russian-made wireless phone in the vicinity of the White House and other locations."

Crackpot much?
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Durham raising a very good point about Joffe:

"[Joffe] had a history of providing assistance to the FBI...but decided in this instance to provide politically-charged allegations anonymously through the defendant and a law firm that was then-counsel to the Clinton Campaign"

Why?

"defendant claimed that he was not acting on behalf of any clients when, in fact, he hid his relationship with clients who harbored political and business interests tied to allegations against a then-Presidential candidate."

Durham revealing "business interests" is interesting.

Read 5 tweets

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Feb 16

https://twitter.com/15poundstogo/status/1493699486555725830

Here's a big lie from a Feb 16, 2017 FBI briefing (not known who was briefing/being briefed):

The briefer claims that Trump's "Russia if you're listening" comment triggered Downer to come forward. That's a lie. Downer came forward earlier. Strzok told the same lie in his book.

https://twitter.com/15poundstogo/status/1493699486555725830

Here's the analogous section from Strzok's book. I called out Strzok's lie at the time. He then claimed he misremembered because he didn't have his notes when he wrote his book.

Now we know that too was a lie, a lie about a lie. The FBI was pushing the Downer lie all along.

@CBSNews

Here's the original tweet in which I called out Stzrok's lie about Downer. Btw, @CBSNews and @CBSDavidMartin still haven't corrected their false reporting on this.

https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1302674506453078017

Read 5 tweets

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Feb 3

Rough translation of a key section of Wiesendanger taking Drosten to the woodshed.

Drosten, who founded the Gain of Function advocacy group "Scientists for Science" in 2014 has had the entire German media to himself. Finally his lies are being called out.
archive.fo/KzjNw

@R_H_Ebright

Another key section. cc @R_H_Ebright

Drosten got excessively triggered by the publication of this Cicero article today, so much so that he called a renowned scientist an extremist. Of course, Drosten never offered an explanation for his fraudulent Lancet letter, which was one of the points raised by Wiesendanger.

Read 6 tweets

Hans Mahncke

@HansMahncke

Jan 29

https://twitter.com/walkafyre/status/1487296901124923398

1/ Interesting supplemental filing from Durham. Horowitz must have complained that Durham publicly exposed him. But the supplemental filing does not address the crucial issues, i.e. it does not address Horowitz's lies and omissions about Sussmann, it only covers Baker's phones.

https://twitter.com/walkafyre/status/1487296901124923398

2/ Remarkably, even though the supplement is limited to Baker's phones, it is speculative on that issue. Horowitz says it's "likely" Durham was told about the phones in 2018. Durham says he does not recall being told. Be that as it may, the main issue is left totally unaddressed.

3/ Never mind what was or wasn't said in 2018. The point is that Horowitz failed to disclose his possession of the phones in Oct 2021 when Durham specifically requested any information that may be relevant to the Sussmann case (Baker is the main witness, his phones are relevant).

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Hans Mahncke

People who liked this thread also liked...

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @HansMahncke

Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke

Hans Mahncke

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Like this author's thread?