Some daily considerations about Semantic #SEO, #Python, and strategy for your next project.
This time I am going to include new stuff and write not-so-obvious considerations.
Your updated thread for improving your knowledge about data 🧵
Semantic SEO is different from the simple topic cluster approach. Here you are interested in connections about entities and ontologies.
In other words, you want to have a clear idea of how to create links between your pages and proper navigation based on evidence. >>>
>>> The traditional cluster approach has no mention of all these elements. Creating content is not going to make the difference if you cannot build a network.
This is true in highly competitive environments where you need some "authority" to be deemed worthy.
You can see it starts working when you notice a sharp increase in Impressions. This should lead to an increase in clicks later or at the same time, according to my experience.
This amount of time is not fixed and can change depending on several factors.
Semantic SEO is not even necessary for some niches where competition is pretty low but it's so convenient that you should either way.
It's better for the user as well, because you're planning a structure that makes sense and your content is connected according to some logic.
You don't need huge topical maps. A shallow one is more than fine. Recall that topical authority doesn't mean you have to be perfect!
As an experiment, I tried competing with Wikipedia on some long-content pages and I noticed that it is quite possible to be 2nd or even first with the proper topical authority.
However, competing for such short queries is usually not worth it and not even lucrative.
If you have a blog or an online magazine you can create specific pages for entities with attributes.
Short example, large videogame websites have pages for each videogame, listing all their attributes. They don't know this is a very good approach! >>>
>>> Having such pages is super good and a godsend for internal linking. Add the proper schema markup and supporting content and you will get good results.
There are alternatives, of course, you don't need to copy what other people do all the time.
You can cover all the contexts around a certain topic.
If you sell fridges, you can create articles that contain comparisons, information about different details, buyer guides, and good category pages.
You're covering the full customer journey here!
Competing in the USA/UK is super hard compared to non-English-speaking countries most of the time.
However, much larger markets have a lot of untapped opportunities!
You can check foreign websites to understand what they do. Underrated methodology but extremely deadly if applied correctly.
Some search intents are common across the globe and you can get more data by looking at some other countries.
Google tries to understand websites with the help of the Knowledge Graph, an efficient way to store and retrieve data.
Your website should be able to contribute to a given topic and provide some degree of new information, if possible.
You can clearly see some cases where competitors rank higher just for backlinks.
Don't despair, it takes time to see the results of Semantic SEO.
And this is why it's better for long-term advantage rather than immediate momentum!
There are instances when it's faster, it depends on your content velocity as well.
Your publishing rate may make the difference in some niches.
To play it safe, recall that it may take quite some time for Google to process your information, on average.
There is no clear answer without looking at competitors in given domain knowledge.
Try to understand who are your competitors by checking who is ranking most of the times for common queries.
Then, check if you have the same model and what you can do.
In my case I adopt a different strategy with B2B, as I am still learning and it's challenging.
In the case of online magazines the methodology is totally different.
Some criteria can help you to gain an edge over competitors >>>
to to to
>>> Instead of going after news content, you can build topical authority around evergreen content.
The supporting content that is not suitable for traditional search can be reinvented for Discover!
Some interesting considerations on data for #SEO and how it's very easy to lie with them.
And ok, some curiosities and strange facts as well, keep reading. A thread to open your eyes 🧵
Let's start with the very basics. For big brands, you should always filter out branded keywords in Google Search Console, no option here.
You want to attract those people who aren't directly searching for you.
Filter by query and select Custom (regex), then just select "doesn't match" and insert all the branded terms. To select more use the pipe operator |, it means OR.
What if the problem is not #SEO related? How come, you are an SEO and you face a problem that is not connected to your job... or is it?
A thread about the importance of value proposition and quality for every SEO project 🧵
SEO is just one part of the story. It is not the only digital channel and will never be.
I prefer to focus on SEO because that's my path. This doesn't mean a business should do SEO. Being holistic is key.
That's why understanding how you want to reach your audience comes first.
Business and Marketing are not about having a good product and that's it. They cover other areas of interest and techniques that promote what you sell.
There are bad products with excellent marketing or vice versa. In some cases, they are both bad.
These 2 are the bare minimum and are correct. You don't need anything else to start.
The most common belief they want to sell you is that SEO is business independent. Let me explain, claiming that the subject is a set of techniques or something you can apply indiscriminately.
SEO overlaps with a lot of other subjects, it is not a watertight compartment.