Good morning,
As I have listened to the $PEN (Panoro Energy) conf call for the fourth time register.gotowebinar.com/recording/7716…
I really recommend spending some time with it and the presentation. mb.cision.com/Public/399/351…
This company produce in 3 countries, all growing.
MCAP of $PEN is 423musd and EV about 500musd.
2022 is set to give us FCF meaning after tax, G&A, planned CAPEX but ex amortizations of ~140 musd @ 105usd oil realized which looks like a possible average. That on mid guided production levels= probably conservative numbers
The immediate growth that is coming is in Gabon where they partner with BW Energy. This growth has been delayed due to a long lead time for "gas lift equipment". Meaning large parts of the growth is simply only a delivery of that equipment later this year.
Blue&Green is PEN Gabon
Post that equipment some development drilling. In other words, 2022 is a year that really have sandbagged numbers. We are about to jump... a lot... with little drama around that growth. This means the 2022 FCF says little about FCF built in capacity.
So where are we going? Well, we started with 500musd EV, about to FCF 140 musd this year. What next?
Well, at 85usd oil, the following 3y, with built in planned expansions & mid expected production range:
369 musd on top of that. Obviously anyone can use 105$ oil and get 473musd
Personally, I think a 60% larger (production barrels/day) $PEN perhaps 14 months from now + having cashflowed 150 musd or whatever, is highly likely to have doubled in price. Likely more with if they & the Lundin family has success this October in Namibia or if oil is very strong
Listening to the company in the conf call and other places, I also came away with a strong feeling that a year from now we also have a new target, much higher than 12500 bpd for the coming year from the partner here going for growth in EG. trident-energy.com/strategy-and-a…
At the same time in partnership with $EGY and $BWE the prospects look excellent to find more oil around their existing very successful fields:
So... coming 6 months: 1. Production taking off as equipment arrives, most of it unhedged. 2. High impact drilling with the Lundin family in Namibia. 3. Dividend to be introduced. If Pareto is to be believed, 15-20% yield style. 4. Probably drill & expansion plans 2023 EG
Expect that number to be a bit higher in the next update.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Age profile of $RIG
Note that they have included the newbuilds under construction to reach this.
Age profile of $VAL ships in the same segment:
Note that little "1". Means they exclude the options they have to take a couple of newbuilds (they are very likely to take that before end 2023).
But VAL also have a unique arrangement with the key players in Saudi so they also work with normal & higher spec Jackups. A very profitable JV that I guess we could see spun out eventually to shareholders.
Seriously... $RIG is a high risk company... high utilization on long legacy contracts producing this:
Adjusted EBITDA was $250 million, compared to $245 million in the prior quarter
vs
the blue bars below:
Night and day vs VAL's Risk vs Reward imo.
When you are done adding together the blue bars and comparing that to the EBITDA their great backlog is giving them.. you can compare it to having more cash than debt and the debt being due 2028
Dividends anytime soon? More likely more new ATM shares issued I would guess.
This is one of my 3 key oil Co holdings: vermilionenergy.com
In oil 1 of the most interesting things now is divestments at low prices from majors like below: Equinor to $VET
Besides the NA export risk, I am really not fond of the "no growth" policy pushed by investors there.
So besides preferring international assets outside of NA I also want companies that are not afraid to grow organically or by merger, preferably before even more inflation invades the space. I am less fond of companies sitting on 20y reserves... never likely to be used.
The fact that most Canadian & US oil investors seem to take the opposite view on most of the above is quite interesting. IMO means they are likely to give away opportunities, scarce resources for expansion and the better valuations that I think will soon be awarded to growth.
I trade this one a lot but yesterday, despite knowing the flooding & winter effect, I took the position upwards to 4% portfolio weight yesterday. Despite being a ketchup company like no other, the potential is huge while being quite low risk imo. tasekomines.com/assets/docs/Q4…
I do expect Florence to get its permit soon and I do expect it to work, be the most environmentally friendly "mine" in the world as well as very profitable. The pipeline after that is world class. Some small positive noise about New Prosperity lately imo despite confidentiality.
"The dialogue is not complete but it remains constructive, and the parties have therefore agreed to extend the standstill for a further year so that they and the Province of British Columbia can continue to pursue a long-term and mutually acceptable resolution of the conflict."
This chart makes sense to me. Starting at the cost of a newbuild and the first 6y which are the ECO vessels staying close to linear and then dropping like a stone for 2013 and older. Clearly brokers acknowledge the ECO value closing in on IMO2023 regulations.
(Clarkson)
But here is the Clarkson and general broker view on large tankers, it doesn't make sense to me. There is no acknowledge that 0-6y ECO's should stay close to linear depreciation. Quite the opposite. And note that this is not due to new vessels not being able to get profit charters
According to $OET, if you start with a NB value of 120musd (their chosen example) and stick to linear for ECO vessels (meaning 2014 and younger) their NAV is above 150 NOK today.