1. Cladding Remediation - 57 months post #Grenfell there are still 70 high rise blocks with ACM cladding on their walls. Thousands of blocks with other types of combustible cladding remain stuck in the Government Building Safety Fund (for numerous Govt policy inflicted reasons)
2. Data Collection - @DLUHC have semi reliable data wrt High Rise, some data on Mid Rise and next to no data on Low Rise blocks. Despite pestering Govt from late 2018 onwards to call in FRAs and use these as the base for building a robust dataset
3. Legislative Response - FSA achieved Royal assent in Apr 21 and has not commenced. Not a #PEEP from the Home Office when this will happen. The Building Safety Bill is being frantically and continuously amended by Government at the final throes of its passage through Parliament.
4. #Grenfell Inquiry Recommendations - Phase 1 recommendations including FED checks, Premises Information Boxes, PEEPs etc remain unimplemented 29 months after they were published.
5. Risk Assessment - there is still no agreed or benchmarkable measure of holistic risk for a residential building. Even buildings applying for the finite Building Safety Fund pot cannot be reliably ranked in terms of risk. Govt just apply the overly simplistic Height = Risk.
6. Enforcement - FRS enforcement of the FSO in terms of Notices, Prohibitions & Prosecutions remains minuscule in relation to the size of the Building Safety problem. We only have to compare the 1k+ Waking Watch impositions in London with the lack of Notices on the LFB register..
7. Building Regulations - ongoing tolerance of combustible below 18m and acceptance of single stair high rises are a few of the seemingly obvious issues with Building Regulations that remain unaddressed.
8. Leadership - the entire legislative and policy response to Building Safety is being led by an unpaid Minister of State that has no demonstrable Fire, Construction or Crisis Management experience. @team_greenhalgh appears well intentioned but is clearly floundering.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Important explanatory notes for the #BuildingSafetyBill Amendments tabled by Earl of Lytton for anyone following the debate today. If any of the other Lords have issued explanatory notes for their amendments please post in the thread. lnkd.in/dUFXghUY
201 - This new amendment provides for the Crown to take on the liabilities of the freeholder if a building with building safety defects escheats to the Crown (plugs @luhc gap)
202 - This new amendment prevents trustees in bankruptcy or liquidators from disclaiming the lease of a building with building safety defects on the basis that it is onerous property.
"There seems to be some type of cover-up going on, as I was refused a copy of the National House Building Council's report on this system which was then obtained by Granada and shows all of the major defects in the system."
"...a debate should be held to force the Government to prevent the continued use of this system, at least until the BRE survey of timber frame construction is published in full and to ensure that the report is not hushed up."
Daisy is calling for a public inquiry into the #BuildingSafetyCrisis with a focus on 3 key areas:
1. Scale - how many bldgs impacted/data 2. Building Safety Fund - multiple issues 3. Gap between Govt promises and actions
Describes the prospect of leaseholders suing developers as 'Alice in Wonderland stuff' - references the recent @NAOorguk report stating @mhclg own views that lawsuits would not be successful.
"It is the responsibility of the building owner or manager to make sure the AOV, which is designed to ventilate and extract smoke during a fire to help residents escape, operates correctly."
"Had it not been for the exceptional actions of our firefighters and 999 control officers this could have had tragic consequences." thank you @LondonFire 💚
@hmtreasury@GOVUK will soon be making a profit out of the #BuildingSafety Crisis! Simple maths for the moment, would welcome help from an economist to validate. Pls share THREAD 👇
£1.6bn of taxpayer funding pledged to #ACM fund (£600m) and #BuildingSafety fund (£1bn) assuming this is all spent @hmtreasury could receive back 👇
£320m in VAT £200m Tax/NI from project workers, £100m Corporation Tax from remediation firms. So £1.6bn becomes £980m. This is further reduced by 👇