🧵 A thread to share the speech (with some edits to fit Twitter limits) that I gave in Hong Lim Park yesterday at the protest against the #deathpenalty in #Singapore, with further references in [ ].
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Thank you all for coming down today, despite the rain and the damp and the humidity.
By showing up, you’ve demonstrated your opposition to state violence in all our names.
By showing up, you’re also showing the many family members and loved ones of people on death row that there are people who stand with them.
This is a powerful act of solidarity, in a country where family members of prisoners on death row encounter callous comments that flippantly dismiss the humanity of the people they love.
To all these families, I would like to say that we see you and we stand with you.
The T-shirt that I’m wearing today says “We are all Hsu Tzu-Chiang.” Hsu Tzu-Chiang is a man who spent 16 years on death row in Taiwan for kidnap and murder, until he was released in 2012.
In 2016, I attended a workshop in Taipei for death penalty abolitionists in Asia. The organisers gave each of us this shirt. Hsu Tzu-Chiang was there to present it to us in person.
I bring this up today to highlight that this is not just our fight in Singapore. Although there is a clear trend of countries moving towards abolition, the death penalty is still retained in far too many jurisdictions.
Although there's evidence that punitive criminal approaches to drugs do not work, there are 35 countries that retain the death penalty for drug offences, and others in which a “War on Drugs” has already claimed countless lives in extrajudicial killings and other atrocities.
Last year, @DPInfoCtr in the United States reported that, since the 1970s, about one in eight death penalty convictions in the country were wrongful, and eventually resulted in exoneration.
There are multiple reports from around the world of people who had already been executed before miscarriages of justice were discovered. We can never bring them back.
Gobi had actually already exhausted the standard legal avenues; his clemency appeal had even been rejected. If not for a late-stage court application, Gobi could have been executed.
These are only a few examples. There are so many, far too many, more. There is already so much suffering in the world; state-sanctioned killing does nothing but add more.
In every society with the death penalty, this act of state violence spreads pain and grief and trauma that ripples out beyond the confines of execution chambers into the hearts of families and throughout the community.
Capital punishment is a brutal system that makes brutes of us all. It appeals to our worst instincts for violence and blood, distracting us from compassion and mercy and true justice.
Instead of pushing us to address inequalities and exploitative and oppressive systems that leave people marginalised and unsupported, it makes us the worst version of ourselves.
Today, we stand in solidarity with all the activists and advocates, lawyers and human rights defenders, and, most importantly, the families, communities, and people affected by capital punishment all over the world. @ADPANetwork@cpjp_org_au@Reprieve@DeathPenaltyP
The struggle for abolition is a difficult one. The people confined to their cells on death row depend on those of us outside to speak up and take a stand. Their friends and family cannot take on the fight for their lives alone.
Only when we stand together, when we practice compassion and care in defiance of a regime that turns killing into an administrative act, can we keep one another strong and push forward.
This morning I worried that few people would show, especially because it rained earlier. When the government repeatedly says there’s overwhelming support for the #deathpenalty, it can make you feel very alone and on the fringe. Thank you to every single person who came today.
Members of Abdul Kahar's family attended the protest today. They, too, said that the turn-out was larger than they'd expected. Kahar's younger brother, Abdul Mutalib, told me, "It is over for my brother. Now we fight for everyone else."
When @Kokilaparvathi read out the names of people on death row (based on research done by @tjc_singapore), Mutalib expressed shock at how long the list was.
"There are 62 names," I told him.
His eyes widened. "62... [They're] not numbers. They're people."
As an anti-#deathpenalty activist and someone supporting Nagen’s family at this time, I’d like to respond to this horrific statement from #Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs. 👇🏼
Firstly: while the MHA statement rehashes what the courts said about Nagen’s actions being “the working of a criminal mind”, what *isn’t* disputed is that Nagen’s IQ is only 69, he has borderline intellectual functioning, ADHD, and his executive functioning skills are impaired.
Under international standards, these conditions should in and of themselves be enough for Nagen to be spared #deathpenalty. See this report from 2000 by the then-UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions: tind-customer-undl.s3.amazonaws.com/7de8b811-97c8-… This is not new!
I know that many people have different opinions and criticism of The Online Citizen. I don't want to dissect all the things that have been said about TOC. Instead, I'd like to reflect on the impact it's had not just on Singapore, but on individuals like myself.
I joined TOC as a volunteer in 2010. Believe me when I say I was green—a complete blur-blur rookie. I was only just beginning to show an interest in socio-political issues. There was so much I didn't know, from the ins and outs of Singapore politics to how to write news reports.
Actually, the only thing I had to offer when I first joined TOC was the fact I knew how to operate a camera and use video editing software. They were short of a person who could go out (as part of a small team) to get vox-pops on the mandatory death penalty in Singapore.
As a layperson, trying to follow #Singapore’s #Covid19 messaging since early 2020 has become incredibly confusing and just so damn exhausting.
This is a Covid fatigue thread/rant.
We’ve been praised for our handling of the pandemic (despite some serious fuck-ups, like with the migrant worker dormitories), but if you’re living in Singapore trying to follow the comms, it’s mind-boggling.
Yes, we have to keep in mind that #Covid19 is new and there's still so much that we don’t know about it. Things change as the science reveals more. That’s understandable. But there’s still a lack of clarity in communication that makes people more anxious and uncertain.
1/ At various times over 2020/21, there’s been interest in #Singapore’s response to #Covid19. I think people outside SG see a lot of surface-level stuff and end up projecting their own opinions/desires onto our measures.
A 🧵 to unpack some of Singapore’s Covid response so far.
2/ Recently, there was excitement (outside SG) about how SG said #Covid19 will be endemic, and will move away from quarantines/border closures/focus on daily case counts. This was used to support arguments that Covid is “like the flu” and restrictions elsewhere should be lifted.