“Nothing is said about improving energy efficiency. The first line of any new energy policy in the UK should read ‘insulate, insulate, insulate’." Prof Jon Gluyas, Durham Energy Institute
1/n
"This is not the holistic energy security strategy UK needs. It is half a strategy, focused on energy supply. Once again, government has missed an opportunity to provide more immediate relief to families facing very high energy bills" Prof @watsonjim2@ucl #EnergyStrategy
2/n
“The absence of any near term strategy on how to deal with transport and the high cost of personal travel is simply mind boggling. The recent reduction in fuel duty on fossil petrol and diesel was textbook regressive" Christian Brand @UKERCHQ #EnergyStrategy
3/n
“Defining feature of this #EnergyStrategy is incoherence. It doesn’t know what problem it is trying to solve and thus fails to solve any. [It] ignores energy efficiency and kicks the only short-term supply option [onshore wind] into the long grass"
Prof @MichaelGrubb9@UCL
4/n
“The potential benefits [energy efficiency] are now bigger than ever, and we again call on government to set out a costed, long term plan for meeting its own targets and help households and the planet”
Sir John Armitt,@NatInfraCom #EnergyStrategy
5/n
"By ignoring demand reduction, spurning onshore wind, and failing to provide adequate fiscal support the government has prioritised nimbyism and fiscal ideology, leaving the public, rather than Putin, out in the cold" @danielrportis@InstituteGC #EnergyStrategy
6/n
"Delay [on energy efficiency] will only increase the burden on UK bill payers and slow progress away from Russian gas and action on climate change. This is a go slow strategy in a fast moving world.” @whittso@cisl_cambridge #EnergyStrategy
7/n
"We could reduce global emissions by 40-70% by 2050 via demand-side actions – there are certainly huge opportunities in the UK" Professor @PDevinewright University of Exeter. Lack of measures a "vital omission" #EnergyStrategy
8/n
"Govt has prioritised policies keeping us dependent on high-cost fossil fuels and nuclear power. This isn’t an energy security strategy. It is a national security threat and the person who will be happiest with it is Vladimir Putin.” @Ed_Matthew1@e3g #EnergyStrategy
9/n
But some people are happy...
“The #EnergyStrategy breathes new life into the North Sea, giving investors confidence to allocate significant capital," Sam Laidlaw at oil company Neptune Energy
10/n
“This is a truly momentous day for the offshore wind industry and for every consumer in the UK. We are making the changes we need to make offshore wind the backbone of the UK electricity system"
Duncan Clark, @OrstedUK
11/n
“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to ensure an orderly transition to net zero while bolstering the UK’s energy security and @Shell is ready to play our part"
Ben van Beurden, Shell CEO
a late entry....
“Govt has potentially put in place, with Future System Operator, means to implement #EnergyStrategy but it [lacks] necessary funding/actions on short-term crisis - many families will be choosing between food or heating this winter.”
Dan Gladwin @sheffielduni
and another
“New IPCC report and UK research show energy demand can be halved by 2050, whilst improving our quality of life. But the #EnergyStrategy focusses on expensive and slow supply technologies. It will fail to deliver what is needed.”
Prof @NickEyre University of Oxford
one more
“Energy policy is commonly seen as having three goals – ensuring a secure supply, delivering affordable energy and reducing CO2 emissions in the face of climate change. The #EnergyStrategy fails on all three counts"
Bridget Woodman, University of Exeter
oh - and this
“Govt are taking a ‘big bet’ on dinosaurs when they could have backed mammals. Any nuclear project is inevitably hugely expensive, runs over time and budget, and leaves waste we still don’t know how to deal with"
Sarah Darby, University of Oxford #EnergyStrategy
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The implication for the biggest culprit, fossil fuels, is clear: it’s over. The IPCC states that existing and currently planned fossil fuel projects are already more than the climate can handle
ICYM
Polluting industries around the world are using the #coronavirus pandemic to gain billions of dollars in bailouts and to weaken and delay environmental protections
Here’s some examples I’ve collated… (all links in story below)
FOSSIL FUELS
In China, as the worst impacts of the virus outbreak passed, there was a surge in permits for new coal-fired power plants. From 1 to 18 March, more coal-fired capacity was approved than in the whole of 2019.
In South Korea, the major coal plant builder Doosan Heavy Industries got a $825m government bailout; green groups say the company was in deep financial trouble before the pandemic
THREAD - How global heating is causing more extreme weather
Greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, forest destruction and other human activities are trapping heat and putting more energy into the climate system. (1/n)
Hotter air means heatwaves are much more likely. For example, scientists now say the unprecedented heat and wildfires across the northern hemisphere in 2018 “could not have occurred without human-induced climate change”. carbonbrief.org/northern-hemis… (2/n)
In Australia, the scorching summer of 2016-17 in New South Wales was made at least 50 times more likely by global heating, linking it directly to climate change. climatecouncil.org.au/resources/angr…
(3/n)