Thread by @ChelleGentemann

More #inclusive #openscience can help solve society’s most pressing problems—and at a faster pace—but making it mainstream requires systemic institutional change. Our new article: issues.org/opening-up-ope…
@libcce @cekroeger @theNASciences @theNASEM @AAUniversities
A thread🧵 (1/8)

"The whole enterprise has to change to truly realize the full benefits of open science..... Technology has not only improved the speed at which science is carried out, but many of the problems scientists study, from climate change to #COVID19, demand urgency."🧵 (2/8)

The type of knowledge-sharing and collaboration exemplified by #CMIP and @pangeo_data must become standard, which requires institutionalizing these practices.🧵 (3/8)

gallery.pangeo.io/repos/pangeo-g…

Institutions are too often mired in slow, cumbersome approval procedures that are incompatible with open software and collaborative science practices.🧵 (4/8)

At every level, researchers should understand how to do #openscience, and funding agencies should support these efforts and tailor them to their communities.🧵 (5/8)

Action at the individual & team level can only go so far toward solving what is truly a systemic shortcoming. It is only through changing institutional frameworks that #openknowledge, #opendata, #OpenSource, and resources can become the rule rather than the exception. 🧵 (7/8)

@NASA announced a new $40 million, five-year mission, Transform to Open Science (TOPS), and declared 2023 as the Year of Open Science. Our first community forum is next month. Join us! 🧵 (8/8)

The writing process.....this article started out with a video at the top:
And used to include a lot of emojis 😍🤦💩😱🤩because writing should be fun🤪!