The bridge proposals are up on #Osmosis governance. But why do we need to select a "canonical bridge provider" in the first place? A quick educative thread on the basics π§΅
#Cosmos (like Polkadot) is an ecosystem of interoperable blockchains. It is optimised for connecting chains that deploy on them natively, e.g Juno & Osmosis on Cosmos, or Moonbeam & Acala on Polkadot.
Chains built with the Tendermint consensus & Cosmos SDK are IBC compatible out of the box, so the whole Cosmos ecosystem can plug in quickly and happily communicate.
But other consensus algorithms arenβt optimised for IBC. They need a light-client implementation to be able to receive/interpret IBC data from other chains. This requires some upfront development work and a chain upgrade.
These developments are already on the way on Near & Polkadot for instance, but they'll take longer (years) on Ethereum or Bitcoin.
If IBC can't be used yet, a different solution is required to bring assets from other ecosystems into #Cosmos. At the same time, @sunnya97 and the rest of the Osmosis team want to make sure the DEX user experience stays top-notch.
That means first limiting the amount of pre-fixed tokens (e.g whUSDC for Wormhole USDC). So the Ethereum assets bridged by the selected canonical (i.e "approved" or "standard")provider will named ETH, USDC, etc. and not whETH or whUSDC.
That also means avoiding liquidity fragmentation by "prioritising the assets of the canonical bridge, incentivising them earlier and more heavily than the comparable assets of non-canonical bridges".
I've already talked about #Axelar and my #Nomad thread is coming up shortly. I'll be looking in overall alignment with the Cosmos & Osmosis communities, including the team, token distribution, VCs, tokenomics & airdrops.
I'm planning to cover the entire #Cosmos extensively through educative & digestible threads. Consider following me @ThyBorg_ & liking & retweeting that thread to get all the analysis on airdrops, tokens, teams & projects βοΈ
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Should #Cosmos projects continue to airdrop a large amount of their total supply to the community? Looking at the price performance of the projects that chose to airdrop against the projects that chose to launch on #Coinlist, the answer is a resounding yes π
I took the first price point available through Osmosis / Coingecko API and compared it to the price point for the same ticker yesterday before the weekly close.
The three big "airdrop" projects are up
$JUNO is up 255% from $4.2 to $14.9 since 21-Oct-2021
$OSMO is up 11% from $4.52 to $5.0 since 23-June-2021
$STARS is up 78% from $0.06 to $0.1 since 20-Dec-2022
The Great Osmosis Bridge-Off is officially on and the vote is open until next Wednesday. Here's a selection of the best tweets & threads I've seen on the topic so far π§΅
Yesterday @Cryptocito interviewed @zcpeng, CEO of @ignite_com. Ignite, formerly Tendermint, is the company that started #Cosmos. Here are the highlights of the conversation, part1 π§΅:
On a quick background note, Tendermint was founded by @jaekwon and @buchmanster. I wrote a thread about them and the other influential people to know in the ecosystem here
Back to the interview. The rebrand from Tendermint to Ignite is meant to prevent confusion between Tendermint the company and Tendermint the consensus protocol (which now powers half of the blockchain world, including the Terra, Cronos, Polygon, BinanceSC)
If you've staked $ATOM in 2022 and haven't received any #airdrops yet, here's a piece of comforting data: the average time between snapshots and claims is currently 4.5 months (134 days), so you're probably being included in snapshots now. A quick thread π§΅
For $JUNO the snapshot was 18-February-2021 and the claim was 1-October-2021 meaning 225 days later
For $OSMO the snapshot was 18-February-2021 and the claim was 15-June-2021 meaning 117 days later
@osmosiszone stakers will soon be asked to vote for a bridge provider to connect #Osmosis to #Ethereum and other EVM chains as well. Hereβs why I think @axelarcore is a top contender π§΅
1- Saying the team is qualified is an understatement
Co-founder @sergey_nog was a founding team member at Algorand and @MIT PhD. Co-founder @yorgosv_ graduated from MIT as well, and got a gold Medal at the International Math Olympiad.
The other 25-ish employees area mostly PhDs with world-class cryptographic experience.
As I'm getting deeper & deeper into the #CosmosEcosystem rabbithole, I've started to look at the people behind the projects. So here's a master thread on the prominent Cosmos builders, which I'll keep updating over time π§΅
Let's start with @jaekwon . Jae went to Cornell University. He co-founded Tendermint in 2014 and stepped down as CEO 2020. Now working on gno.land
@buchmanster was Jae's co-founder and CTO of Tendermint. Jae & Ethan created Cosmos. Today, Ethan is CEO of @informalinc . and president of @interchain_io