Delhi High Court hearing a petition seeking declaration of PM Cares fund a state or else restrain from using the Prime Minister's image or national emblem. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund@PMOIndia
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appears and requests the case to be adjourned since he is on his legs in another matter.
"I understand petitioner’s urgency must be immense. I will also try to find out the interest the petitioner is espousing that they can’t even wait," SG.
I want to know which great interest he is espousing... Your lordships may not have a choice when something of an ambush like this takes place: SG.
Bench tells Mehta that the petitioner has said he will argue only for 20 minutes and ample time will be given to the government to give its response. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund@PMOIndia
Bench asks the counsel appearing for petitioner if he is saying that such a fund cannot be set up at all?
Counsel: I am saying if such a fund is set up, it is state. It has all the ex-officio people as its members.
Counsel: High constitutional functionaries like the vice-president and cabinet secretary are writing saying it is a government fund.
J Navin Chawla asks if the the High Court under Article 226 can give a declaration that a body is private or not.
Divan: Yes, 226 is meant for that. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund @PMOIndia
Divan: The writ which is the second petition here is wrt to RTI act because they refused the details. Your lordships have now extended article 226 to ensure public accountability.
Divan: The most important issue here is of public accountability. Can we allow these cozy arrangements under our constitution? #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund @PMOIndia
Divan: If we are going to prevent the quid pro quo business then we can't have this situation where such money is accepted and we don't know what is happening. It is the issue of good governance.
Divan concludes.
Divan: As far as second petition is concerned, it will depend on the judgment in this issue. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund @PMOIndia
Divan: I might add, that we are not suggesting any action has taken that is mala fide. But it is legally obnoxious and goes against the constitution. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund @PMOIndia
Bench asks ASG Chetan Sharma as to when they will make their submission.
ASG: The second matter has to be heard first. It is not in vacuum so your lordships will have to decide the latter part in the first. Locus and maintainability also has to be decided.
Divan: The second matter is related to RTI act. In that matter we have the benefit of the SC order. If the fund is indeed a state then we have no issue.
Bench dictates order.
Order: Mr Divan has advanced his submission. On behalf of Respondents, SG has to advance his submissions however he is held up in another matter.
Order:
Court lists the case for further hearing on July 4.
Sr Adv Sidharth Luthra, Amicus Curiae in the case: There are 26 lakh cases, and now it’s increased by 7 lakh in 4 to 5 months. That is a disturbing number here. One defaulting area is Delhi and Gujarat has 4 lakh cases, Maharashtra has 5.6 lakhs #NIAct
Justice Ravindra Bhat: there needs to be a greater analysis of pendency
Luthra: only 15% of last year’s pendency has been disposed and then less cases are being disposed every year #NIAct
CJI NV Ramana led bench to hear a plea by #Delhi government challenging the Government of NCT Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2021 over the issue of administrative services #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: By way of a preface, this court is aware that article 239 AA was inserted after the constitution was framed. Initially there was concept of state were in class A, B etc. Delhi was class C state. Legislature wanted to do something
#SupremeCourt is hearing a matter regarding cancellation of ration cards in Telangana
Bench: What were the grounds?
Counsel: They have grounds cited for general cancellation, but for me no specific criteria/ground cited. 21.94L cards cancelled which were given after verification by ration authorities.
One day say sorry, discontinued. Act of extreme cruelty, poor families rendered w/o cards.
Counsel: [Reads from written submissions] Total ration cards between 83-87, roughly a quarter then cancelled. When we protested lack of notice, their counter was NFSA there is no mention of notice needed
Natural justice means notice should be given. On Aadhaar, made mandatory
Bench: We know this case list make a point. Prob is Givernoe sending Cabinet recommendations to President.
Counsel: Consistent stand has been against the Governor's reccomendations. all IPC offences, culled out case by case, 302 cases power with governor
For this case ...
CBI has challenged the order passed by Special CBI Court in Aakar Patel's case of FCRA. CBI Court had upheld an order setting aside a look out circular (LOC) that stopped him from traveling abroad.
Delhi High Court will continue to hear today former JNU student Umar Khalid's plea seeking bail in the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots#UmarKhalid#UAPA
In the last hearing, the High Court had expressed a view that it found Khalid's speech obnoxious and inciteful.
Read the full story here: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
The Delhi Police has now filed a short affidavit opposing Khalid's bail application.
The petition will be heard by a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots#UmarKhalid#UAPA