Kelsey Davenport Profile picture
May 8 16 tweets 6 min read
4 years ago today, former President Trump made the irresponsible decision to withdraw the US from the #IranDeal - an agreement that had proved to be effective & verifiable in blocking Iran's pathways to the bomb.
Lets examine how damaging that decision has turned out to be 1/
Trump withdrew despite members of his own cabinet acknowledging that Iran was complying with its obligations. He also isolated the US by leaving the deal over the objections of key US allies that view the nuclear deal as critical for their security.
dw.com/en/frances-emm…

2/
Certain Trump administration officials even opposed the decision to withdraw. In Oct. 2017 then Defense Secretary Mattis said it was in the US national security interest to remain in the nuclear deal.

theguardian.com/us-news/2017/o…

3/
Unfortunately, Trump didn't listen. His withdrawal from the #IranDeal & subsequent maximum pressure campaign manufactured a new nuclear crisis with Iran that jeopardizes US national security.

Because unsurprisingly, Iran responded by violating deal's limits to build leverage 4/
When the #IranDeal was fully implemented, it would have taken 12 months to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for 1 bomb, if Tehran chose to do so. And with Iran subject to the most intrusive monitoring regime ever negotiated, any move to a bomb would be quickly detected 5/
That 12 month breakout has now shrunk to about 2 weeks & will continue to drop. And with Tehran having significantly reduced monitoring & verification, Iran could soon try to dash to produce enough weapons grade uranium between inspections. That's a serious proliferation risk. 6/
And likely risk the US won't let stand. Even though weaponization would take another 1-2 years, that process is much easier to conceal even if the breakout was detected. So the best chance of disrupting a dash to a bomb is before the weapons grade material is produced & moved. 7/
The decline in breakout is largely due to Iran's resumption of enrichment to 20% & its decision to start enriching to 60%-a new level for Iran & dangerously close to weapons grade. The use of advanced centrifuges (strictly limited for a decade under the deal) also contributes 8/
This great chart from @votevets shows how Trump's disastrous policy led to Iran ratcheting up proliferation sensitive enrichment and building up stockpiles of enriched uranium that far exceed levels in 2013 when negotiations on the #IranDeal began. 9/
This size of these stockpiles, plus the size of the stockpile of uranium enriched to 5% & deployment of additional centrifuges also means that Iran could quickly produce enough weapons grade uranium for additional warheads. 10/
This isn't the end of the bad news. In the long term, if the #IranDeal is not restored, Tehran could pursue a plutonium route to the bomb by completing the Arak reactor using its original design, which would produce enough weapons grade plutonium for 2 bombs per year. 11/
And all of these activities would be subject only to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty's required safeguards agreement with the IAEA - which has proven inadequate in guarding against illicit nuclear weapons-related activities in the past. 12/
So in sum, as a result of Trump's disastrous decision to withdraw from the #IranDeal on May 8 2018:
1) Iran's uranium enrichment program is now on the brink of undetectable breakout
2) Iran's nuclear program is subject to significantly less intrusive monitoring & inspections 13/
3) US credibility took a blow because Iran was complying with the deal when Trump withdrew
4) the US showed blatant disregard for the security interests of US allies; &
5) US national security is now at risk because of the proliferation threat posed by Iran's nuclear program. 14/
While Trump ignited this crisis, President Biden bears responsibility for failing to put out the fire. There is a path back to full implementation of the #IranDeal - if he is courageous enough to put effective nonproliferation policy ahead of politics. 15/
Restoring the #IranDeal will not transform the relationship between Washington & Tehran or erase tensions in the region. But all of these problems are significantly worse & more challenging to address under the looming threat of a nuclear-armed Iran. 16/16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kelsey Davenport

Kelsey Davenport Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KelseyDav

Apr 26
Back from leave and disappointed to see that the future of the #IranDeal remains in limbo and so focused on the politics of modifying IRGC sanctions.

I'm surprised to see so little discussion about the nuclear cost Biden will pay if he fails to act. 1/
Lest we forget, the JCPOA is a nuclear deal. Designed to address a decades long nuclear crisis and block Iran’s pathways to nuclear weapons. The imperative of restoring the deal's guardrails is getting lost in the debate about the political cost of delisting the IRGC. 2/
While Biden would certainly pay a price for delisting the IRGC, effective nonproliferation policy that benefits U.S. security, not domestic politics should guide decision making on JCPOA. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Sep 8, 2021
US Sec of State Blinken warned today that the US is getting "closer to the point at which a strict return to compliance with the #JCPOA does not reproduce the benefits that that agreement achieved"

That's not surprising given the bleak picture pained by the IAEA's new report 1/
The current IAEA monitoring situation is particularly serious. In addition to Iran's refusal to official clarify if the February 2021 special monitoring arrangement is still in place, Tehran has not responded to requests by the IAEA to access remote surveillance equipment. 2/
Under the Feb 2021 special arrangement, this equipment is recording information that will be given the IAEA if the JCPOA is restored. The data will ideally allow the IAEA to maintain knowledge about Iran's nuclear activities during the period when Iran limited inspector access.3/
Read 20 tweets
May 14, 2019
Today, both the NYT & Newsweek repeated claims that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons - it is irresponsible & dangerous reporting to let these claims stand unchecked. #IranDeal 1/
Both Pompeo & Bolton have muddied the water with loose rhetoric describing Iran’s nuclear program that implies Tehran has an active nuclear weapons program - despite US intelligence assessments and IAEA statements saying otherwise. 2/
Pompeo said April 22 that one of the U.S. demands of Iran is to “end your pursuit of nuclear weapons.”
state.gov/secretary/rema…

Bolton said in February that Iran “continues to seek nuclear weapons.”
3/
Read 8 tweets
May 21, 2018
US Secretary of State Pomepo is talking about the #IranDeal right now - c-span.org/networks/?chan…
Pompeo reiterates an often used criticism of the #IranDeal, namely that the agreement expires. This mischaracterization ignores key provisions that remain in place in perpetuity, such as more intrusive monitoring & a prohibition on weaponization activities
Pompeo says the Trump administration will ensure that Iran has no path to a nuclear weapon, by applying “unprecedented financial pressure” & the “strongest sanctions in history.”
Read 10 tweets
May 8, 2018
Ahead of Trump’s announcement on the #IranDeal - at which point he is expected to reimpose sanctions in violation of the agreement - it is worth recapping what nuclear agreement has accomplished & its nonproliferation value 1/
As a result of the 2013 interim deal, Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 20 percent was neutralized. The JCPOA prohibited enrichment to levels above 3.67 percent for 15 years 2/
Iran also removed nearly 20,000 centrifuges, including its more advanced IR-2 machines, and is capped at enriching uranium only with 5,060 IR-1s at Natanz. Iran can only stockpile the equivalent of 300 kilograms of uranium enriched to 3.67 percent 3/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(