Tweet

@ukhomeoffice

@ukhomeoffice

@ukhomeoffice

@ukhomeoffice

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @stand_for_all

Daniel Sohege 🧡

@stand_for_all

May 11

https://twitter.com/stand_for_all/status/1524078121133264901

How many of them will join those already being incorrectly classed as adults by Home Office social workers? How many risk being sent to Rwanda or stuck in camps? The government rejected amendments to the #antirefugeebill which could have helped. #r4today

metro.co.uk/2022/05/10/mor…

https://twitter.com/stand_for_all/status/1524078121133264901

@ukhomeoffice

Does the @ukhomeoffice think that increasing the inhumanity of the UK's asylum system will deter children seeking safety? Does @pritipatel think it will stop them trying to reach family members? Because anyone with half a braincell knows it won't.

@ukhomeoffice

We are already seeing separated children placed at more risk of trafficking and exploitation because of @ukhomeoffice policies. That's why organisations such as @Love146UK are fighting for child protection to the priority. Please support them today.
cafdonate.cafonline.org/20440#!/Donati…

Read 5 tweets

Daniel Sohege 🧡

@stand_for_all

May 10

The Home Office has been seen to incorrectly age assess children as young as 14 as being 23. No matter what they claim, it is inevitable that children separated from families and loved ones will get caught up in their draconian plans to persecute asylum seekers.

The creation of the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB) under the provisions of the Home Office and implementation of fundamentally flawed and inaccurate "scientific age assessments" is only likely to make the whole situation far far worse.

We have undeniably seen a dramatic spike in "age disputes". A significant part of the problem is that, while some are adults posing as children, the Home Office has put immigration enforcement ahead of child protection and is mis-aging children. That puts them at risk.

Read 6 tweets

Daniel Sohege 🧡

@stand_for_all

May 8

Stand for All is a consultancy. We work with other organisations, push on policy, advocate for refugees and migrants. We aren't a front line service. If you are contacting us then you are desperate. This from M is one of many emails I get regularly. People with no other hope. 1/

@Keir_Starmer

Look at the people he has tried previously. @Keir_Starmer, @AngelaRayner, @TomTugendhat, @UK_FoRBEnvoy and Victoria Atkins, who I can't find on Twitter. Look at how hard he has tried to get a response, and for how long. 2/

British educated, directly persecuted, terrified for himself and his family, and ignored. M is one of so many, and so many need assistance. This is what government "resettlement routes" mean, people hiding and in fear for their lives while their calls for help are ignored. 3/

Read 5 tweets

Daniel Sohege 🧡

@stand_for_all

May 5

@thetimes

I see @thetimes is reporting Home Office press releases as fact again, even when both their own reporting and a quick Google search would have shown that unaccompanied refugee children are not treated anything like UK children in care. 1/

@ukhomeoffice

No experts interviewed in this piece, just uncritically letting the @ukhomeoffice knowingly lie. It wouldn't have taken much to contact and organisation which actually knows something about this, but that wouldn't fit the government line would it. 2/
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…

The lack of critical reporting skills applied to stories about refugees is beyond dangerous. It isn't every journalist, and it isn't even the same throughout any particular media organisation, but there is for some a seeming agenda which clouds journalistic ethics. 3/

Read 9 tweets

Daniel Sohege 🧡

@stand_for_all

May 4

So many specialists have been warning about this from the start and every time we have been told to be quiet or "what are the alternatives". The alternatives were always there if the government would have just invested in asylum mechanisms. #r4today 1/
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-613110…

Instead though they have continued to fail to properly resource the existing mechanisms, mechanisms which have been shown to work, and relied on outsourcing protection to the public. Yeah, because that wasn't going to always create safeguarding risks like these. 2/

The benefit of investing in those mechanisms, which bring together local authorities, NGOS and experienced specialists is that they are then there to help everyone, so we can reduce use of hotels for Afghan refugees though. 3/

Read 4 tweets