@Paul1971EFC@thinkdefence Sure thing, meanwhile you can think where the idea came from, I can help..
Plans and preparation for such big sabotage to take Bout 1/2 y
@Paul1971EFC@thinkdefence As you perhaps know BoJo visited the submarine base just before he left the office and left to 3 consecutive foreign holidays with family (Slovenia, Greece, Carribbean) ...well I suppose it was better to be out in case RU got idea for retaliation.
Well, Liz Truss who approved..
@Paul1971EFC@thinkdefence was hiding from Friday 26/09 till 28/09 over the sabotage on Monday 26/09...
@Lv10noob@NavyLookout If there was a high chance it was RU navy, and some evidence seems to exists already, they would get a full blockade through DK straight for sabotage/ecological impact and #NS would get immediately revoked its permits.
A NATO member most likely did it, outside NATO structures.
@Lv10noob@NavyLookout And only a nuclear power could fit the suspect profile. So US, FRA and UK.
The USA has been warning Germans in early September about possible sabotage.
Public has no direct evidence but circumstantial evidence hints to UK.
Unless proven innocent the UK is suspect.
@Lv10noob@NavyLookout Denmark has physical evidence: On Brnonholm there are hydro-acoustic station.
DK PM flew 3d after to UK and looked very very upset.
SWE has sonar data from their ships which caught a submarine before the sabotage.
US has data from P8 from several encounters with the sub.