yesterday I threw out an off the cuff question to @bitfinexed
How much of the redeemed #tether was used to recover and maintain its peg?
The obvious answer is whatever they had to.
I've spent a big chunk of today crunching data to see what answers I could come up with.
Last night I scratched out my hypothesis - to maintain its peg...#tether would need to tap its own cash...can only do that via redemptions and the 'tell' will be burning the tokens like they never existed.
Basis for this thinking is pretty simple. That's what they do when they need cash and lots of it. Remember back in 2018 #novogratz was swooning over the orderly redemption of $700m by #tether.
But no one could work out where or who the cash went to...then NYAG discovered that #bitfinex had cracked open the #tether piggybank....#jointhedots
After getting pinged by NYAG Bitfinex/tether had to pivot and paper over the funds as a loan.....but this didn't change their habits...here's the repayment of $100m by #bitfinex..
essentially - burn on the way out and issue new tokens on the way back in.....
So with that background in mind - let the #FUD begin.
So here we have donkey boy doing a "victory lap" about processing $3B redemptions in a day.
Really? How amazing.....because they have always been so quick to process redemptions to outsiders...lets take a trip down memory lane....#bitfinex customers hung out to dry for months after the wiz lost nearly a billion to #cryptocapital....but yeah now #bestactorsever
What are the chances that Donkey and team are prioritising customers wanting to get out of #tether and literally emptying the coffers....meanwhile there are amazing white knights digging in and buying billions of tethers to stop Armageddon.
Lets just call bullshit right here....there's absolutely only one reason anyone would process billions of redemptions....and that is so they can buy billions of tether on the market. Anyone else is a rat trying to escape the sinking ship.
What really shits me is this bullshit....about the ninja efficiency of traders arbing #tether every time their is even a sliver of profit to be made....because of course half a percent is the best arbitrage opportunity in the market
Lets just have a look at how ridiculous this rationale is. The best opportunity in the entire market in the last 48hours is propping up #tether. No other bargains out there.
So who's buying up all the #tether? Well its certainly not the broader market - Here's a chart of tether top 100 holders over the last week (nothing says decentralisation quite like 0.002195% of holders owning > 50%).
So it was the top 100 chart where I started to drill down. As all the action has happened in the last few days I've only built out the data for 1 May to 14 May 2022 using coinmarketcap data. The issued USDT has been estimated by mktcap/closing price
I've used the % from the chart to estimate the tokens held by each segment of the top 100 (1-10, 11-20 etc).
Stripping away some of the noise - and just comparing 1 May to 14 May 2022. The top 10 now hold 31.5% of issued tokens an increase of 3.7B tokens in 13 days. Yet the total tokens on issue have reduced by 4.4B
while the top 100 now for the first time hold more 50% of tokens on issue....holders 11-100 now have 1.5B less tokens.
Best indicator as to the percentage of the redemptions that have been used on their own account to re-peg #tether is the actual tokens burned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE You idiot. The contract award amount is not paid by the gov agencies it is fully funded by a 3rd party under an ESPC with a performance guarantee by Ameresco as the ESCO, it is self funded through the savings gained through the retrofit/upgrades across the 23 buildings.
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE So instead of paying zero, the agency will have to continue to maintain aging and legacy equipment the older they get the more expensive O&M is.
@DrFranzC @NortheastCash @sprintcat9 @DOGE_GSA @DOGE So now the agency will have to go through the same process at some stage the agency will have to waste time and resources going through the process again making an assessment between two pathways;
- ESPC; or
- Design-bid-build
Well done DOGE. You have just cancelled a contract for the feasibility study for a ESPC (Energy Saving Performance Contract) the sole purpose of guaranteeing the costs savings to be achieved by the project to secure 3rd party financing which is repaid by the savings generated through the term of the contact.
This contract went through a multistage tender approval process. So by cancelling it you have delayed the project.
@DOGE_GSA the contract is 23 years because the service provider (who guarantees the energy costs savings) provides the O&M services....guess the money comes from....the fucking guaranted savings.
So why does it cost so much to undertake the feasibility studies. because you are shifting the risk from the gov as well as the financing. The provider needs to be absolutely certain that those savings are actually going to be available to repay the 3rd party loan that finance all the capex and has sufficient additional cashflow to fund the O&M.
mate its absolutely achievable. I've done the numbers.
There are only 2 critical success factors; 1. Bitcoin goes to $23m per coin by 2045; 2. A visionary buyer that has accumulated > $20T and has confidence that even after 20 years of 34% CAGR providing the seller with a 350x bagger, that there's sufficient upside to warrant acquiring 1m bitcoin for > $20T.
The analysis;
Current US GDP $29.33T, Debt $35.49T
Using World bank forecast GDP growth of 1.9% and assuming the debt ratio stays the same
2045 debt will be a spritely $51.71B
Just for good measure here's the GDP and debt numbers for the Top 20.
Even after the 50% debt reduction, the US will still have the largest debt of all countries.
For the purpose of the analysis I've distilled the Lummis plan down to;
Buy 1m BTC for $70B using existing cash reserves.
Exit all or part of BTC holdings by 2045 to payout half the total debt.
In estimating how much of the investment would be required to settle 50% of the debt.
Two scenarios: Pessimistic (sell down 100%) and probable (sell down 50% ).
So for months I've been asking the question.
Who is behind the unnamed "private sector" group who are being given prioritised access to delivering food and supplies into #gaza.
I am suprised that literally no one appears to be looking into who this un-named collective that has delivered 25% of all 'goods and services' into #gaza.
I say G&S and not #humanitarianaid as these are commercial arranagements. Not for the starving or needy just for those that can pay.
The previous pie chart falls well short of actually what's happening with the shift to these unknown private groups.
When you look at the data over the last 3 months. Private groups are > 50% and increasing volumes month to month while total deliveries are decreasing.
July they are at 75% of total.
Here's a little #googlesheet #osint tool I made.
is the best free #whois history service.
But it works even better if you use its #API (which starts at $2 pay as go). Whoxy.com
To make it easy to use. I created a googlesheet using the importjson script.
The whoxyAPI provides 5 search functions;
Whois, whois history, email, person, keyword saerch
@RepMikeCollins No problem with tasering student while handcuffed.
In fact you seem so proud of that you thought it was worth cheering on.
Was it because he was a student? Or because he was protesting? or because he was black?
@RepMikeCollins Not sure what your laws are down in Georgia.
But here is a police department recommendation report from Stanford that gives some pretty clear guidelines when a Taser can be used.
So why would cheer on someone getting tasered while handcuffed expressing his First amendment right?