[Thread] There has been a lot of debates, and distorsions, about France’s position on #Ukraine and #Russia lately. While concerns are legitimate given the gravity of the situation, many arguments I’ve heard are off-base. A thread to debunk some misconceptions:
1/ "France is pushing Ukraine to compromise": this controversy started from an interview given by President Zelensky to the Italian press. A quote from the 🇺🇦 leader was misleadingly reported, giving the false impression that President Macron urged him to cede territory.
This is entirely false. The transcript of the itw clearly shows that Pres Zelensky was not explicitly speaking of the 🇫🇷 President. More importantly, Pres Macron has always been cristal clear that it is up to the 🇺🇦 to decide the terms of their negotiations with the 🇷🇺.
See for instance his speech to the European Parliament: "As Europeans, we are working for the preservation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is up to Ukraine to define the conditions for negotiations with Russia." …sidence-francaise.consilium.europa.eu/fr/actualites/…
2/ "President Macron should stop calling Putin": the 🇫🇷 President is often criticized for his telephone diplomacy with Moscow. But it is often forgotten that President Zelensky himself is asking for preserving this channel of communication as Putin is refusing to talk to him.
Besides, every call has been closely coordinated with Pres Zelensky. The 🇫🇷 Pres. has never discussed anything with Putin without Pres Zelensky's consent. This diplomatic effort has been praised by the 🇫🇮 President who is also in contact with Putin.
2/ "France wants to preserve Russia": this criticism is based on President Macron’s call at the European Parliament for "not giving in to the temptation either of humiliation or of the spirit of revenge."
This has triggered a very interesting debate on the notion of "humiliation" and what History tells us about it. I won’t expand on this but would like to underline that France is not trying to "accommodate" the 🇷🇺 regime in the hope of finding a diplomatic solution to the war.
Paris has been a driving force in the international efforts to investigate and prosecute possible war crimes committed by the 🇷🇺 military, to impose a massive economic cost on the Russian economy and oligarchs and to isolate Russia on the global stage. reuters.com/world/europe/f…
3/ "France is not doing its fair share to assist Ukraine": since the beginning of the invasion, France has delivered weapons to Ukraine, including long-range artillery (Caesar self-propelled howitzers), and has trained 🇺🇦 soldiers on its soil. politico.com/news/2022/04/2…
This criticism is also missing the larger picture: 🇪🇺 €2 billion military assistance to 🇺🇦 though the European Peace Facility. 🇫🇷 not only is one of the largest contributor to the EPF but has also been a big proponent for its creation in the first place. csis.org/analysis/europ…
France is also providing substantial humanitarian support and financial aid (€2 billion) to Ukraine. reuters.com/world/europe/f…
4/ "France is against Ukraine’s membership to the EU": Again, Pres Macron has been very clear: 🇫🇷 is in favor of "quickly" giving the candidate status to 🇺🇦. But, he also underlined a basic fact: accession negotiations can be long (years if not decades). institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/instit…
That is why, France is in favor of starting Ukraine’s integration to the EU *in parallel* (not in substitute) of the accession process, through a "political community". Important steps are already prepared, notably on the access to the European market.
5/ "France’s dream of European strategic autonomy is now dead": the war in 🇺🇦 has rejuvenated NATO and its collective defense mission. France has long acknowledged that reality and recently decided to substantially increased its contribution to NATO’s military posture.
France has never tried to deny, or undermine, NATO’s critical contribution to our collective security. On the contrary, France is pragmatically pushing for greater European responsibilities, leveraging every tool available (EU, NATO, bilateral or multilateral cooperations).
This is in the interest of NATO and of the United States. Far from making this ambition obsolete, the war in Ukraine has underlined the urgency for Europeans to significantly step up their efforts and take greater share of the burden.
6/ "France is prioritizing its partnership with Germany": the 🇫🇷🇩🇪 relationship is critical for both Paris and Berlin but is far from being exclusive. France has on the contrary tried over the past few years to diversify its strategic partnerships across Europe.
France has notably increased its engagement with the CEE countries since the beginning of the war, in different format: the Weimar format (🇫🇷🇩🇪🇵🇱), France + Baltic States, France + B9 countries. And 🇫🇷 is deploying ships/troops/aircrafts to ensure the security of these countries.
I’ll stop there. In these hard times, it is normal to be demanding with one another. But many criticisms addressed to France are rooted in preconceived ideas, and do not reflect the reality of France’s positions and actions. [End]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, the "mutual assistance clause" of article 42(7) of the Treaty on EU states that if a member state is the victim of “armed aggression on its territory” other states have an “obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power.”
The clause does "not prejudice the specific character of the security and defense policy of certain Member States" (neutral countries), and is "consistent with commitments under NATO, which remains [for its members] the foundation of their collective defense."
[Thread] New 🧵 on the #StrategicCompass. Let’s explore another measure of the Compass: EU-backed coalitions of the willing (under article 44 TEU).
1/ What the #StrategicCompass says: "By 2023, we will decide on practical modalities for implementing Article 44 of the Treaty on EU to allow a group of willing and able Member States to plan and conduct a mission/operation within the EU framework".
So, the basic idea is to better use the flexibility offered by the EU treaties (article 44) to quickly launch 🇪🇺 operations undertaken by a group of willing and able European countries.
"The war goes on. There have been many statements from the Russian authorities. I will only believe in tangible actions. For the moment, they are not there. I note that Kyiv was bombed last night" underlined French foreign minister Le Drian in an interview tonight. A 🧵:
"It is possible that this period of negotiations could actually be used by #Russia to reconstitute its forces."
"What is needed today is the announcement of a cease-fire, a lifting of the siege, the delivery of humanitarian aid and the free movement of people in #Marioupol to avoid a carnage. But this depends above all on a political decision by President Putin."
[Thread] Very informative video reportage on the 🇫🇷 aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle currently deployed in the Med Sea. A 🧵 with some interesting facts: francetvinfo.fr/replay-magazin…
1/ Presence of the 🇷🇺 navy: there would be twice as many 🇷🇺 ships in the Med Sea as usual. The helicopter transporting the journalists even had to circumvent some 🇷🇺 ships. "They're always following us, so it's a bit of a cat-and-mouse game", explains the pilot.
2/ Assessment of the commander of the 🇫🇷 Carrier Strike Group, Contre-amiral Christophe Cluzel: "For me, the main risk today is misunderstanding: attributing hostile intentions to a movement that is considered suspicious when it is not."
[Thread] Now that the #StrategicCompass has been adopted by EU leaders, let’s have a deep dive into some of the concrete actions agreed in this 🇪🇺 document.
Today, the EU Rapid Deployment Capacity.
First, if you’re wondering what the #StrategicCompass is, here is a quick presentation:
So, the EU Rapid Deployment Capacity is easily the measure of the #StrategicCompass which triggered the most comments/questions. It has been wrongly presented either as a new Europe "force"/"army", or as a simple rebranding of the EU battlegroups. reuters.com/world/europe/g…
The planned humanitarian operation for #Mariupol "needs to happen in the best conditions of security and discretion. Mariupol is a new Aleppo. We have a collective guilt if we do nothing" underlined 🇫🇷 Foreign Minister Le Drian in a conversation with @BeckyCNN, @DohaForum.
Mariupol is facing a horrible "siege warfare, with the civilian population being slaughtered. Hence the necessity for having at least one moment when the civilian population can leave. But players on the ground need to enforce a cease-fire starting with the aggressor."
"On #Ukraine, Putin expected a form of fragility and divisions within the 🇺🇦 state, probably remembering the invasion of Crimea in 2014. The exact opposite happened. In a way, Putin has contributed to solidifying and unifying the Ukrainian nation."