Chayu Damsinghe Profile picture
May 19, 2022 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Coming back after a few days off Twitter, thought I'd try and explain in a (hopefully) easy + visual way why, despite things being really tough right now, there's space for hope - even if it doesn't feel like it
🧵👇
#SriLankaEconomicCrisis #EconomicCrisisLK #SriLanka #aragalaya
Disclaimer - personal opinion of course, and this framework is a complete oversimplification, but hopefully this can serve as a useful introduction into why there's space for hope
Explaining this visually in a series of simplified graphs.

It maps the performance of the economy over time.

Here, economy is an overall measure of money, QoL, growth, etc. Up is good, down is bad. Image
So for any country, I'm going to explain 2 lines.

One is the actual performance of the economy - simple enough, what actually happens.

Second is slightly more complicated - but its essentially what is sustainably possible with current resources - or the current potential. Image
To be clear, when I say sustainable/current resources, I'm NOT talking about the environment, but of economic resources.

Think of it as what we can do with money we currently have (pink) vs what we actually do with money we borrow/print as well (purple).
Now in many instances in the real world, what actually happens is above "natural potential" because we can borrow money we don't currently have, and use it to improve our economy.

If that doesn't improve our potential, while actual performance goes up, potential is slower. Image
Now if this economic growth ALSO grows our underlying ability, then it's great. Eg - education driven growth

Even if your "actual" growth is not sustainable in short term, you're growing your potential up as well - so there's no "crash" down to the norm. Image
Bringing this to Sri Lanka - I've explained before how our economy has a strong consumption as opposed to long-term investment bias.

That means our economy sees "actual growth" in short term - while potential growth is slow. Image
Now the thing is, this "actual growth" is not sustainable by definition. It's kept up by borrowing from the future, and once that starts falling, so too does your actual performance.

(printing money is also borrowing from future - future inflation is what you "pay back") Image
But thing is, it's worse than that. When your economy is forced to come back down to the norm, if the crash is hard enough, it can reduce your potential as well!

Eg - shortages, powercuts, unemployment, inflation Image
Lets zoom in on this falling part. Now if we let it continue falling, it will keep crashing - causing massive harm UNTIL at some chaotic future, our current economy is equal to our sustainable potential.

This is bad. Think of it as becoming so poor there's no more to fall. Image
Now if you take action, the outlook is better. You're still going to go down for a while because of the crash that has been set in motion due to not being able to continue with unsustainable measures - but the pace of the fall is slower because of actions you take. Image
When you're in this negative situation, it's easy to say "the action we took made the situation get worse".

It definitely can look like that. After the action, things did get worse. Image
But the crucial point is that it's better, often far better, than the alternative - that massive terrible crash to zero.

You're going down because your earlier growth was due to unsustainable factors - so keeping that up is not possible anymore. Image
But remember, action also means that your potential also gets onto a better trajectory. This is what allows you to reduce the speed of your crash, and in fact, start a recovery well before you reach rock bottom.

This is one point that gives me a little hope - avoiding the worst. Image
Now, if we had acted much earlier - possibly before the peak, we could've had a much better outcome. At that point, action would have made things worse in the short term - but avoided the worst crash.

This has been SL's economic story in past cycles in my view. Image
This time around, we were very late. Things just got so so so bad even before we acted - that even after acting, we're going to be in a lot of pain. Image
I think right now, we're at that point - things are getting bad fast and it's at such a low level compared to what we're used to (and things look like they could get even worse), that it's difficult to come to terms with that fact that we're in a better alternative scenario. Image
A terrible scenario happens if we reverse our actions. We're so far down, that restarting unsustainble action might not even give us temporary relief, and might just immediately drag us down to that crash scenario again.

I really hope we don't do that. Image
But as long as we continue this action, there's hope.

That's important - that this pain is not in vain.

Yes, I personally think our leaders are to blame and they should take more of the burden themselves. Yes, I personally think they need to be prosecuted for bringing us here. Image
But our pain is not in vain. Things will start to improve at some point, and in my view, this will be sooner rather than later.

I know there's so much pain and sorrow everywhere. We need to do all we can to reduce this. But even if we fail at that, this is NOT the end.
This is the future we can hope for. To come to a path of sustainably improving our lives through improving the underlying potential of the economy

Yes, it'll take time for things to get back to where we were. But since we have no space to backtrack, hopefully, we can stick to it Image
The future will still have ups and downs, we can never escape reality after all.

But I'm confident that in the long term, things will improve and improve to levels we could never have expected.

That's what we can and will build towards. Image
Adding a clarification on the recovery of the "economy" - referring to overall indicator that also denotes shortages and the like. Things like GDP might be weaker for longer. Impacts on companies, unemployment, these things don't immediately reverse. (1/2)
But the worst of the worst does, including shortages, availability of basic food medicine etc - this improves faster than later. That's where hope for the majority lies in.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chayu Damsinghe

Chayu Damsinghe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChayuDamsinghe

Sep 16, 2023
GFN is a bit of a bonkers indicator, and I don't think it makes sense to prioritize it for sovdebt. A thread based off a piece I wrote (technical, but hope the thread is not too bad). Relevant to SL
Personal opinion on this, since it is quite an academic argument on the basis of what COULD be. Important point is that even my view here doesn't really matter in the grand scheme, SL works within the global debt architecture and has no ability to unilaterally change it.
Anyway, onto GFN. GFN stands for Gross Financing Needs and is the amount of money a government needs to meet it's requirements. It's calculated as the revenue-expenditure (excluding interest), add the interest, and add the principal payments.
Read 21 tweets
Sep 15, 2023
A lot of "ideology first" narratives of the DDO that pick and choose numbers (sometimes incorrectly) to fit a message. Attempted to set out a wide range of numbers to argue what the actual impact of the DDO on to the EPF is.
TLDR - Not much of an impact of EPF. Of course, one can fiddle around with numbers to show a loss, but upto reader to decide if these are data first or ideology first fiddlings.
Slightly different disclaimer than usual - While this piece is not done by @FrontierResSL and reflects my own personal thinking, some of the data and analysis comes from internal work done with Anjali Hewapathage and @navindameepe across the last few months.
Read 31 tweets
Sep 5, 2023
Excellent article by @TheoMaret and @Brad_Setser on SL's debt restructuring assumptions - a simple yet critical point on how "easy" it is and thereby, not "sustainable".

A few thoughts beyond on areas I have an alternate view.
ft.com/content/34f53d…
Will take 3 overall points Theo and Brad make

1. Sri Lanka will still be left with a high interest/revenue ratio
2. The DSA does not address external debt sustainability
3. The DSA does not ensure Sri Lanka's debt sustainability
1 - on Sri Lanka's high interest/revenue ratio

Theo and Brad point out rightly, how Sri Lanka's main issues have stemmed from (at times comically) low revenue. The IMF programme assumes this increases to 15% - largely through increases taxes and better tax admin.
Read 31 tweets
Aug 23, 2023
Did politicians or voters who voted them in cause the Sri Lankan economic crisis was a question that was increasingly asked since 2022, though very partisan now.

Would like to talk of a 3rd (unwilling?) actor here - middle class consumption
To be clear, I'm not trying to "blame" anyone here, but rather to explore how the reality of what happened is far more complex than "corruption" or even "bad leadership" and "bad policy".

All my views, but very happy to discuss any disagreements!
We can start the story at any point over the last few hundred years, but let's stick to when middle class consumption really started becoming a factor - the late 90s/early 00s.

This was the period when SL's accelerating growth rates became visible in economic outcomes.
Read 26 tweets
Jul 2, 2023
Now that the DDO is approved, thought I'd talk through some of the questions and hopefully help understand what's going on there.
#SriLanka #lka #EconomicCrisisLK #DomesticDebt #SovDebt
I've been staying out of this discussion until recently given the sensitivity of the matter, and an inability to talk about this without getting into technical numbers. Think now though, there are some overall questions I CAN help answer or at least help frame.
This thread will therefore very much focus on giving a framework to think through the situation. Particularly given how partisan this topic is, will try to avoid taking sides on this while still explaining what I think. As always, my personal view not anyone else's.
Read 43 tweets
Mar 24, 2023
Now that the initial euphoria/rage about the IMF approval has hopefully faded, going to talk a bit about what it means and how I look at it.

#SriLanka #lka #EconomicCrisisLK
Usual disclaimer of being personal opinion and thereby, subjective. I'm also especially aware of how political and partisan the topic has become, and being clear that's not my goal.
3/ So yeah, the IMF is here. For me, it's part of a long process and there's so much that remains up in the air, but broadly I remain cautiously optimistic.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(