Firstly, local media and Myanmar Twitter/Facebook are constantly reporting on:
- Funerals of resistance fighters
- Desperate lack of weapons
- Lack of effective leadership
- Capture, torture, burnings of fighters & civilians believed to support resistance
What is being ignored?
There are indeed reports of the very real and historic losses that the Myanmar military faces on all fronts.
The following are happening every week
- Attacks on mil bases
- Losses of whole platoons
- SAC retreats from roads
- Defections
- Admin abandoning entire areas
These events have been extremely rare in ERO conflict areas for decades.
The only comparable period was the AA in Rakhine State in '18-20. The AA now controls about half the state.
Right now resistance in Sagaing and Magwe are facing a total onslaught from the military, causing huge casualties on all sides and great human suffering.
The real concern is humanitarian.
But the SAC is indisputably losing ground month on month. It is not gaining anywhere.
Meanwhile, the SAC losses in Karen, Kachin, Karenni and Chin are astonishing.
SAC administration is basically gone and the only thing in the way of it being replaced by EROs and allies are resource constraints and concern of backlash against local people.
The shift is huge
Any social media account claiming SAC is on verge of defeat (the @TheEconomist doesn't link to any) should obvs not be trusted.
That is total hyperbol. Unfollow anyone who says that
But strawmanning all "Myanmar rebels" and all "local media" without references is just weird.
Ultimately this all comes down to where you choose to set the goalposts to measure victory.
Between '88-21, the military strengthened its grip on power year-on-year.
It is now weaker than it has been at any time since 1962.
The SAC is not going to be able to reverse this
Any sober analysis of the situation should conclude that this is going to keep going for a while and the trajectory is overwhemingly in favour of the resistance.
Gains at the tactical level are unprecedented
Consolidating those victories depends on strategy and politics.
While @TheEconomist snears at Myanmar's revolutionaries for "retreating" when the enemy advances
Millions of people across Myanmar are still giving all their savings, property, sons and daughters up for a better future.
They have not "drunk kool aid". They are making progress
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Myanmar's public defence forces lack capability to take down or even constrain these aircraft
Germany and Netherlands alone have sent at least 700 MANPADS to Ukraine in past week
If Myanmar's elected government had just 10 MANPADs, it would be a game changer
Feb last year, Myanmar's UN rep called for "strongest possible action from the international community to immediately end the military coup, to stop oppressing the innocent people, to return the state power to the people and to restore the democracy.” reuters.com/article/us-mya…
UN Special Envoy calls for non-military-led dialogue with all parties to agree a power sharing agreement as first step towards long-term military transformation.
Reasonable common sense suggestions but lack attention to practical realities...
This is exactly what the UN has been calling for since the 1990s (at least) and what has been consistently blocked & avoided by the military.
This is not an accident. The military could not be more explicit. It knows what is best for Myanmar and its power cannot be questioned.
The closest Myanmar has come to power sharing is the '08 constitution.
The SLORC/SPDC held National Convention but dominated proceedings like a petulant monarchy, offended everyone, took no one elses suggestions and - of course - did not let the UN anywhere near the process.
KNDF: "We will take back step by step, slow and slowly," he said. "We will continue, day by day. We are getting stronger. We are winning day by day."
@YeMyoHein5 : "In the past, their strategy and objective was how to control the country. Now they are focused on how survive."
@khinsandarwin: "I have never seen this kind if unity in our history... We believe that we will win this time. We never think we will lose ... Whether we die or whether you die, this is our slogan,"
This is a relatively small unit of troops. Report say max. 120 trucks. If 25 men per truck, that is 3,000 troops.
I'd expect only a handful of support personnel (comms, medics, intelligence) for every 100 and they will be greatly isolated, hens the long, high-profile journey
MAJOR THREAT that this relatively weak and poorly supported infantry force will lean into Tatmadaw strategem #1:
Abuse, terrorise, destabilise and disperse the local population, destroying food stores, clearing people from the region, and instilling terror in those who remain.
The best book I have read on any aspect of local governance in #Myanmar.
Deep ethnography by local and int researchers on how actually justice works, mostly outside of the official courts where local leaders, EAOs and others fil void.
Also covers customary and ethnic justice practices, in Karen Mon, Naga and Pa-O communities, who - in different ways - handle justice affairs locally without the official state system.
Much needed to go beyond the imaginary and simplistic EAO-controlled / gov-controlled binary.
Critical story on a US gun enthusiast using faux CIA credentials to train #Myanmar activists in highly problematic methods, including home-made indiscriminate weapons.