Bar & Bench Profile picture
May 24 51 tweets 25 min read
A Delhi court to shortly hear the plea challenging decision of a civil court dismissing a suit seeking restoration of Hindu and Jain temples at the Qutub Minar complex in the capital.

#QutubMinar
Additional District Judge Nikhil Chopra from Saket Court to hear the plea.

Read details of order dismissing suit
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Hearing begins.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Appellant appearing in person: There are three connected challenges. Suit was filed before civil judge that this construction was built after demolishing hindu temples.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Appellant: There are evidences to show that mosque Quwwat-ul-Islam was built from the remains.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Hari Shankar Jain, the appellant in person is reading out prayers.

Jain: Government has notified it as a protected monument.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: genesis of this case from very beginning is the admission that there were 27 Jain temples and those were demolished by Mohammedan invaders, first Qutubuddin Aibak. Admitted position that it hasn't been used for prayers. Why can't it (temples)be restored?

#QutubMinar
Jain: Judge in impugned order said fabric of constitution will be damaged.

Court: What is the legal right that entitles you restoration?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Let's assume it was demolished, admission that it was not being used by muslims for the last 800 years. Question is now how can it be restored – on what basis?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Down south you'll find many monuments where are not being used. Prayers offered. Now you want the monument to be turned into a temple. My question is how you claim a legal right for restoration for something which happened 800 years ago?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain refers to Section 16 of Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act.

Jain: If it was a Hindu temple why can't it be used for that purpose?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: But that character is lost…

Jain: Once deity property, always deity property. It is never lost.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel for the other party reads portions of Ayodhya judgment.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: After demolition, temple won't lose divinity, sanctity.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: There are images. Lord Mahavira image, Lord goddess

Court: You mean idols?

Jain: There are idols. There's an iron pillar which 1600 years old. It is in the midst of the monument. That's after the worship. Sankrit shlokas are inscribed there.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Lordship may consider deity is never lost. If deity survives right to worship survives.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: On a lighter side, the deity has survived for last 800 years. Let it survive!

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Let's come to remedy. You want a right to worship. Is it a statutory right, constitutional right?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Existence of idol. Directions are already there not to remove. Question is right to worship. What is the backing of this right? Idol exists there or not is not the case.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: We have a very limited question whether there's any denial of legal right to the appellant.

Jain: There's denial of constitutional right. Refers to Article 13.
(Reads Article 25).

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Fundamental right is never lost.

Court: You mean that this is your fundamental right?

Jain: Yes

Court: Show me any case law which says right to worship is fundamental right.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Right to religion. There are a number of temples in India which are thousand of years old. Like that ‘pooja’ can be performed here also.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: judgment in Ayodhya case is clear. Right to worship survives. It is never lost.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Right to worship has to be adjudicated. There should be some forum for adjudication of this right.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain says the court dismissing the suit made an erroneous decision.

Court: It upheld public order than right to worship.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Section 3 of this act (places of worship) says maintain status quo as it existed.

Jain: This section will not apply.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Show me what is the anomaly in the judgement.

Jain: Religion character is of a temple. And it is my right. Court has to visualise what is "character".

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Right of deity can never be lost. That has divinity forever.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: There can't be any applicability of Places of Worship as far as this monument is concerned.

Court: What is the observation of the Trial Court?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Jain: Paras 22 and 23 - “this provision (Section 16 of AMASR Act) has to be read with Places of Worship Act."
My case is exclusion. Entire suit is dismissed without giving me right.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Any other judgment you're relying upon?

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel for the Archaeological Survey of India begins rebuttal.

ASI: Specific questions posed and I want to answer without getting into details. Whether the character continues or changes, sighting of idols, iron pillar, by whatever names it is called.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: I would submit that there are no grounds of interfering with the judgment of the court below. When a monument comes under purview of 1958 act... Character once frozen in that monument can't be changed and this is what Delhi HC has observed in the judgment.

#QutubMinar
Counsel: judgement is Maulana Nasruddin v. Superintendent ASI (Jan 27, 1999).

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel reads judgment.

The last three lines are very important. AMASR Act prohibits... Characters of the place where allowed or not allowed for worship is governed by the day it comes under protection.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Under purview of 1958 act there is a period of objections. It is for this reason we have monuments for places of worship and not places for worship. These are living or non living monument.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Who decides living or non living?

Counsel: The Act itself.

Court: Suppose there's a dispute.. going by what Mr Jain said – once a deity always a deity.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: I'll come to that.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Coming to Article 25, 26 and fundamental rights. Judgment of lower court very rightly in para 19 says worshippers have right to worship... Argument is devoid of merit. It is settled that fundamental rights are not absolute in nature.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Court has already found that this right is not available in this case. Now we come to point of demolition of 27 temples and the iron pillar.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: The inscription on the mosque itself says that for building Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque the material of 27 temples on the erection for each of which deliwals were used. Inscription is clear that the mosque was built with the remains of these temples.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: But nowhere it is mentioned that the materials were retrieved by demolishing temples. Also not clear if they were retrieved from the site or brought from outside.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Not demolished but remains of temples used for construction. Qutub minar is not a place of worship.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Based on these submissions I'd say the judge below has applied its mind in judicial decision.

Jain: One thing is admitted that places or worship act and monument act are applied in two different fields.

Court: The most crucial question is the character of the building
Jain: Nothing on that.

Court: Suppose you say character is this and he says it is this.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: Courts can't tinker with it. As per his own submissions that for 800 years it is like this. It is only recently that these things are coming up.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Most fundamental question is of the character. Because you say the character got frozen. And they say it was a temple..... It's fact against fact. Can it be decided under Order VII Rule XI (CPC)

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Counsel: The lower court decided correctly on it. The judgement of lower court is a detailed one. It was after taking into consideration all arguments.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court is dictating order.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court: Party at liberty to file brief synopsis on their arguments.

#QutubMinar #Delhi
Court reserves matter for orders. Order to be pronounced on June 9.

#QutubMinar #Delhi

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

May 24
#Varanasi District Court to shortly deliver order on whether the Order 7 Rule 11 application by the Muslim side seeking to reject the civil suit of the Hindu side seeking claim on #GyanvapiMosque be heard first or the commisioner survey report will also be taken along with it
The Hindu side had urged the District Judge AK Vishvesha to grant them access to the CD, Photographs and other contents of the Advocate Commissioner survey report of #GyanvapiMosque

Muslim side submitted the maintainability application be heard first #KashiVishwanathTemple
Read 11 tweets
May 23
Delhi High Court will continue to hear today the appeal filed by former JNU student Umar Khalid seeking bail in the Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots #UAPA
Delhi Police had arrested Khalid in September 2020 for his alleged involvement in the riots in North-east Delhi.
He has been charged with criminal conspiracy as well as UAPA. A special court had denied him bail in March, 2022.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots #UAPA
The appeal will be heard by a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar which is likely to sit specially for this matter at 2:15pm.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots #UAPA
Read 87 tweets
May 23
District and Sessions Judge of #Varanasi, Dr AK Vishvesha will shortly begin hearing the civil suit by Hindu parties seeking worshipping rights inside #Gyanvapimosque. The court will decide the application for maintainability of suit filed by Muslim side first
The corridors leading to the courtroom of District Judge Vishvesha abuzz with Gyanvapi case conversations #GyanvapiMosque #Varanasi
The #GyanvapiMosqueCase will be heard post 2 pm. Parties seen thronging the courtroom. Media access is barred so far
Read 13 tweets
May 21
Delhi University professor Ratan Lal granted bail after he was arrested by Delhi Police for his Shivling post on social media and booked for promoting enmity.

#GyanvapiMosque #Shivling @DelhiPolice @ratanlal72 Image
Judge in bail order: The undersigned, in personal life, is a proud follower of Hindu religion and would call the post distasteful and unnecessary comment made on a controversial topic.
#GyanvapiMosque #Shivling @DelhiPolice @ratanlal72
Judge: For another person, the same post can appear to be shameful but may not incite the feeling of hatred towards another community.

#GyanvapiMosque #Shivling @DelhiPolice @ratanlal72
Read 4 tweets
May 20
The Supreme Court Bar Association holds the farewell function in honour of Justice L Nageswara Rao who had his last working as Supreme Court judge today before the top court closed for vacations.

Justice Rao officially retires on June 7, 2022

#JusticeLNageswaraRao #SCBA
Sr Adv Pradeep Rai: Justice Rao has a multi faceted personality. Apart from being a good cricketer, He acted in many films as a police inspector. He was there even in serials. He acted in the movie "Kanoon Apna Apna" in which he acted with Kader Khan and Sanjay Dutt
Rai: Though I wanted to dig out more, Justice Rao' staff say we cannot dig more than this. Draupadi in Mahabharat prayed for a husband who was Humble, Good looking, handsome, & married 5 Pandavas. Madam (to Justice Rao’s wife) you prayed the same and you got Justice Rao.
Read 33 tweets
May 20
Delhi High Court is hearing the appeal filed by former JNU student Umar Khalid seeking bail in the Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots
The appeal is being heard by a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Rajnish Bhatnagar.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots
Sr Adv Trideep Pais appears for Khalid and informs that he has supplied the documents to explain the meaning of the words 'inqulab' and 'krantikar' as requested by the court.
#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #DelhiRiots
Read 58 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(