When pressing, most teams try to guide the opponent to a specific area of the pitch to eventually win the ball there and transition to create chances.
Normally, there is a distinction between forcing the opponent building-up through the wide areas or the centre. Both ways have advantages and disadvantages, which I'm going to analyse in this thread.
Wide areas:
When guiding the opponent to the wing, the pressing side can use the side-line as an "extra defender", which makes it easier for the pressing side to win the ball there or force a mistake from the opponent.
That’s because it's more difficult to progress from the wide areas than for example from the centre, as the wide player has less options to progress and is restricted through the side-line.
To achieve this aim, it's important that the centre of the pressing team is closed, and the wide area is the only possible option to build-up for the in-possession side.
Often, one or two players start the press and force the opponent to a specific side and then the whole block moves over to create local compactness there and leave the other side more or less free.
Many teams also try to restrict a back pass option if the ball was forced wide, which makes it even more difficult for the in-possession side.
The problem from this pressing approach however is that if the pressing team wins the ball, it's also more difficult to transition and create a chance. After the ball is won, the other team can immediately counterpress and now use the side-line for their advantage.
Therefore, a great structure and good movements to transition are necessary to create chances from this pressing approach.
Centre:
Guiding the opponent into the centre is more difficult and riskier if the opponent is able to progress through the centre as the way to the goal is shorter than through the wide areas and the opponent has better options to progress.
On the other hand, however, winning the ball in the centre means that the pressing side also has a shorter way to the goal, which increases the possibility to create a chance.
Moreover, in the centre, the options to progress are also greater, meaning it's more difficult to defend the transition. Since it's easier to get through the counterpressing of the opponent because of the various progressive options.
Again, it's important to close the centre. However, as the pressing side aims to guide the opponent centrally, it’s also important how the pressing team reacts if the ball goes out wide.
Conclusion:
Guiding the opponent wide is easier but more difficult to create chances after winning the ball. Guiding the opponent into the centre is riskier and more difficult, but it's easier to create chances.
What are your thoughts on this topic, and which one do you prefer more? Regardless of the opponent and if you could have any possible players.
Nevertheless, there is no right or wrong and sometimes changing the approach because of a specific situation is the even better option.
I hope you enjoyed this thread! Feedback is appreciated in any form whatsoever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Scene Analysis:
I watched #ARSBHA yesterday and wanted to quickly break down two brilliant sequences, which demonstrate how the Gunners exploited Brighton’s man-oriented defensive approach.
[THREAD]
Rice just received the ball from White on the right wing, where Arsenal has a 4v4 situation with everyone being marked. The Englishman plays on to Saka with Odegaard providing an underlap.
With Lallana joining in to make it a 3v2 and no real dynamics established, Saka decides to recycle possession and plays back to White. The RB then passes on to Rice, who nicely created some distance from Gilmour with a quick double movement and eventually plays it back to Saliba.
Aspect Analysis: How Man City pulled Man United apart – a masterclass in progression and chance creation #MUNMCI [THREAD]
This thread breaks down City’s mechanisms to advance through the thirds and eventually generate chances in the derby.
United’s 4-2-3-1 defensive setup against City’s 3-2-2-3:
- Hojlund on Dias or shadowing a 6
- wingers pressing the halfbacks or tucking in on a 6 if needed
- McTominay shifting between double pivot
- double pivot marking 10s or pushing up on a 6 if needed
This usually led to a nominal 5v4 (or even 6 with Ederson) overload in their build-up structure (blue marked) and/or a 4v3 overload in the midfield (green marked).
Aspect Analysis: The last time Newcastle faced Brighton #BHANEW [THREAD]
Newcastle plays against Brighton this weekend. As a little preview, let’s look back on their previous encounter in the PL last season and how the Magpies dominated with their intensity out of possession.
To begin with, Newcastle pressed incredibly high and looked to disturb Brighton’s deep build-up with extreme aggressiveness. The Magpies used some sort of a 3-2-2-3 shape with a narrow front three and wide 8s against the Seagulls’ 4-2-4 structure. footballxplained.de/brighton-build…
The main aim was to guide Brighton towards their right side with Almiron or Wilson initiating the press, using a curved run to keep Dunk in their cover-shadow.
Match Analysis: ManUtd – Leicester #MUNLEI [THREAD]
How Leicester started off strong in the first half and why Ten Hag’s slight adaptations enabled the Red Devils to dominate the second 45 minutes.
The Foxes regularly found Castagne out wide freely from the build-up with a clipped ball and kept on exploiting ManUtd’s left side in the first 25 minutes.
Moreover, the Red Devils struggled to create anything meaningful in possession against Leicester’s 4-2-3-1/4-4-2 hybrid mid-block. The Foxes looked to control the centre by simply using man-orientations and were threatening on transitions.
Team Analysis: Arsenal’s various attacking mechanisms [THREAD]
The Gunners are flying under Mikel #Arteta this season, currently ranking 1st in the Premier League. A key component of their success are the different chance creation methods, which will be analysed in this thread.
Dynamical space occupation and rotations:
Rather than simply occupying spaces, the forwards aim to dynamically arrive at specific areas, making them harder to mark. Furthermore, the Gunners would at times purposefully leave spaces unoccupied to then move into them quickly.
Moreover, they use different kinds of rotations, which can cause a dilemma for the opposition and might end up in the creation of a free man or the generation of space.
Aspect Analysis: How Emery’s 6-2-2 nullified Tottenham #TOTAVL [THREAD]
2023 started with a surprising result as Aston Villa beat the Spurs by 2-0. Unai Emery’s team showcased a brilliant but unorthodox defensive performance, which kept Tottenham’s offensive efforts quiet.
Emery opted for a back six out of possession with both wingers nearly constantly staying deep besides the fullbacks. Therefore, Aston Villa had one man more in the last line (6v5), meaning there wasn’t an unmarked player, and they weren’t prone to switches.
Nevertheless, let’s have a deeper look on what made this setup so successful by breaking down each player’s task. The strikers first and foremast aimed to shut down Spurs’ double pivot. At times, they could press a centre back or track deep.