13 questions were included in the LCSS capturing 3 domains:
Enacted (overt experiences of discrimination), Internalised (internalising negative associations with Long Covid and accepting them as self-applicable),
Anticipated (expectation of bias/poor treatment by others) stigma.
This is from a follow up survey of a online survey we did at the end of 2020: journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
We have over-representation of females, white ethnicity, and people with higher educational qualifications. All non-hospitalised in the first 2 weeks of the illness.
Disclosure questions:
61% (n=557) of respondents said that they are (sometimes of more often) very careful who they tell about their Long Covid.
34% (n=308) said that they (sometimes or more often) regretted having told some people that they have Long Covid.
A surprising finding (at least to me!) was that those who said they have a definitive clinical diagnosis of LC experienced higher levels of #stigma. Is this because they had more contact with services & interactions about their LC? Is it because their LC is somehow more visible?
To clarify, enacted, anticipated and internalised #stigma can be related or triggered by eachother or can occur independently. "For example, a person may anticipate stigma, decide against disclosing their health condition or seeking treatment and therefore avoid enacted stigma."
Just want to say, we've worked through this paper during some hard times for some of us. I'm so privileged and grateful to work with the wonderful people who are my co-authors. All of us care a lot and have a shared goal of helping people with LC. That makes a difference.
Stigma associated with health conditions is a problem. It can drive people away from treatment, help & support. It can cause tremendous stress which is not good for recovery. It can increase health inequalities in society when it compounds pre-existing social stereotyping.
Many people, including those in positions of power, want to move on & forget about covid. #LongCovid is a constant reminder. Attitudes of minimisation & rejection can reflect negatively on the reactions people living with LC get from others. Professionals should be aware of that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Always wrong to set high expectations of catching up on work during the weekend, then feel guilty for not achieving them and instead, erm, actually use the weekend for what’s it’s for: relaxing!
Remember those public health vs the economy debates & headlines in 2020-21 when we were saying #CountLongCovid?
Well here goes an answer from none other than the Bank of England.
The quotes below are from a speech by Michael Saunders, Monetary Policy Committee Member: 1/5
"Since Q4-19, the number of people aged 16-64 years that are outside the workforce and do not want a job has risen by 525,000 (1.3% of the 16-64 age population)."
2/5
"This largely reflects increases in long-term sickness (roughly 320,000 people) and retirement (90,000), with smaller contributions from lower participation among students (65-70,000) and short-term sickness (30-35,000 people)."
3/5
Let's look at what the response to consultation document said about #LongCovid:
"The consultation responses raised concerns that long Covid (sometimes called post-Covid
symptoms) will not be sufficiently considered within the Inquiry’s investigations."
The draft Terms of Reference cover the healthcare sector’s ‘provision for those experiencing
long-COVID’."
"We will also investigate the extent to which risks associated with long Covid
were considered under other parts of the Terms of Reference — for example, consideration of
‘how decisions were made, communicated, and implemented’ will include investigation of....
TL;DR: In the tripple-vaccinated no statistical evidence of difference between the Omicrons & Delta in the prevalence of #LongCovid. However, BA.2 seems to lead to higher prevalence than BA.1 of LC of any severity.
1/7
Odds of LC 4-8 weeks after a *first* covid infection (not reinfections) is 50% lower in infections compatible with the Omicron BA.1 than those compatible with the Delta among adults who were *double-vaccinated* when infected.
Prevalence 15.9% for Delta and 8.7% for BA.1.
2/7
There was no statistical evidence of a difference in risk between first infections compatible with the Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants among *triple-vaccinated* adults.
LC prevalence was 8.5% for Delta and 8% for Omicron BA.1.
3/7
A short thread about the latest #LongCovid prevalence @ONS release as I was ill when it came out 2 wks ago.
Headline of course: 1.7 million people with LC in the UK (2.7% of the population), but there are some other important figures in there too:
(sources at end of thread)
1/8
Of those with LC:
33% first had (or suspected they had) covid before Alpha became the main variant.
15% in the Alpha period.
27% in the Delta period.
19% in the Omicron period.
(minority were of unknown illness duration). 2/8
#LongCovidKids prevalence latest estimates for a duration of at least *12 weeks*:
Even if the cause of the rising cases of hepatitis in children is adenovirus and nothing to do with covid (jury’s still out) then the public health measures to limit spread are the same. It’s a respiratory virus so not it’s not just hand washing.
1/4
“Despite the assumed dominance of droplet transmission, there is robust evidence supporting the airborne transmission of many respiratory viruses”. That includes adenoviruses. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… @kprather88@jljcolorado
2/4
“Volunteer challenge studies showed that influenza virus and adenovirus infection initiated by the inhalation of infectious bioaerosols required a lower infectious dose”. @nancyleung_hk 3/4 nature.com/articles/s4157…