“Agreement with Indiana marks milestone in UK’s trade with the US”—the UK government proclaims
Read on
It's a memorandum of understanding on what the UK and Indiana want to develop in their trade and economic relations. That stretches the meaning of “agreement” quite a lot
“The MoU creates a framework to remove barriers to trade and investment, paving the way for UK and Indianan businesses to invest, export, expand and create jobs.”
Remember: all major trade barriers are handled in Washington
So what, in detail, does the press release actually say?
“The agreement will look to improve procurement processes and strengthen academic and research ties, enabling academics and businesses to collaborate more easily.”
“It aims to support our talented professionals with provisions on diversity aligning with our levelling up agenda to ensure economic growth benefits all communities across the country.”
Ah. “Levelling up.” Does Indiana promise to invest in Stoke?
“It aims to help talented people from the UK and US to cross the pond for work by paving the way for their professional qualifications to be recognised on both sides”
Yep, recognise professional qualifications (future)
“Green trade will be at the heart of talks as both sides look to accelerate clean tech development, with a particular focus on electric cars and low emissions technology solutions.”
Note: future tense again. So the talks haven’t begun yet.
It’s been clear for some time that WTO members are unlikely to agree on anything substantial on agriculture—despite declaring it a priority—when their ministers meet in Geneva Jun 12–15
Information from trade sources on a meeting last Thu May 19 reinforce that assessment🧵
1/11
The focus has changed in recent months—the Ukraine war has increased concerns about food security.
But the best binding decision that can be expected is to exempt the World Food Programme’s humanitarian purchases from export restrictions—still opposed by India & Tanzania.
2/11
Expect some non-binding/“best-endeavour” statement on food security, eg, the UK-led proposal⬇️, which draws on familiar themes of keeping supplies flowing, increasing transparency, minimising market disruption.
Chair @WillsSantiago briefed the media after a stock-taking meeting of the membership.
Sandwiched between plenaries Mon and Fri, were sessions in various formats. Wills said 30-40 delegations were involved in each of those sessions, total about 50.
WTO members on all sides were urged today to sort out their reservations over the proposed compromise, so that a deal on waiving some intellectual property protection for COVID-19 can be struck by the Jun 12-15 Ministerial Conference, trade sources say.
In an informal meeting of the WTO intellectual property (TRIPS) council, Director-General @NOIweala said WTO members have no option but to produce a result for the #MC12 Ministerial Conference, even if that means negotiating round the clock, the sources said.
2/14
Today's meeting was held to take stock of the first two days of real negotiations on the compromise text⬇️, on Mon&Wed, May 16&18. During those sessions, @NOIweala urged delegates to be prepared to compromise: "the perfect is the enemy of the good"
TRIPS Council chair Amb. Lansana Gberie (Sierra Leone) said: "It is the only product that we have. It’s the only game in town.” No one disagreed according to Rockwell.
So for the first time members will negotiate a text, and it will be this one.
WTO members still have a range of reservations about the text—on adding diagnostics and therapeutics, concerns that existing flexibilities in WTO rules should not be compromised, and more🧵⬇️
Most said their capitals were still considering the text.
WTO members were largely non-committal today in their first reaction to the proposed compromise text on intellectual property and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most said they needed more time to study it, although some indicated some concerns
None of the “Quad”—EU, India, South Africa, US—wholeheartedly endorsed it even though the text emerged from consultations among them, with the help of WTO director-general @NOIweala and her deputy @_AnabelG
Their common line was they hoped it could lead to agreement.
2/12
India & SAfrica authored the original proposal⬇️. WTO members were deadlocked over it.
Today, SAfrica said the compromise could finally allow members to negotiate a text, and focus on finding a solution for the Jun 12-15 Ministerial Conference.
This is about transparency in what governments do under the WTO trade agreements.
It’s a major role of the WTO, achieved by members notifying each other (and the world at large) through the WTO. That allows understanding, scrutiny and feedback.