Uttarakhand government has formed an expert committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge for examining and implementing Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the State. #UCC#UniformCivilCode#Uttrakhand
The order by the State Home Department reads, "The Governor is pleased to approve the constitution of the following expert committee to examine and report on all relevant laws governing individual civil affairs of all citizens residing in the State of Uttarakhand...
...with amendments to the draft law or existing law, applicable laws relating to marriage, divorce, property rights, succession, adoption and maintenance and protection, etc and to examine and implement the Uniform Civil Code."
Retired SC judge Ranjana Desai, who currently heads the Delimitation Commission, will head the committee which also includes retired DHC judge Pramod Kohli, social activist Manu Gaur, retired IAS officer Shatrughan Singh, and Doon University Vice-Chancellor Surekha Dangwal. #UCC
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nikhil Upadhyay, a law student, seeks impleadment in the #GyanvapCase before Varanasi District Court alleging that only those places are protected under Places of Worship Act, 1991 which were constructed in accordance with the personal law of person constructing them. #gyanvapi
"Retrospective cutoff date cannot be fixed to legalize illegal acts of barbaric invaders as Hindu Law (Temple Character never changes) was ‘Law in force’ at the commencement of the Constitution by virtue
of Article 372(1)," he argues. #GyanvapiCase#VaranasiCourt
He further contends that Muslims cannot assert any right in respect of any piece of land claiming to be a Mosque unless it has been constructed on legally owned
and occupied virgin land. #Gyanvapicase#VaranasiCourt
Hearing begins.
Ms. Sanya Kumar J. appears for Umar Khalid.
Chargesheet is being read out. Portion on secret meeting in Seelampur between Khalid and other co accused is being read out.
Gyanvapi dispute | #VaranasiCourt to resume hearing on the plea challenging maintainability of the suit filed by 5 women for performance of all rituals of Hindu deities within the "old temple complex" allegedly existing inside the mosque site. #GyanvapiHearing#Gyanvapi
The hearing will start at 2 pm before District and Sessions Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha. Counsel for both the parties have reached the courtroom. #GyanvapiHearing#Gyanvapi
Media entry is barred inside the Courtroom. The Anjuman Intezemia Masjid Committee is likely to continue its argument today. Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is appearing for the Hindu parties in the case.
#AllahabadHighCourt holds that against any order u/S 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, the right to appeal u/S 16(1) is available 'not only' to the senior citizen and parents 'but also' to the children, relative, or other person too.
Section 16(1) reads, "Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal....."
Court said, "Maintenance has to be given by some person or institute or a juristic person and if such a maintenance is been granted, some person must be affected and thus, non-mentioning of the words in Section 16(1) is not a casus omissus, but it seems an accidental omission."
A Delhi Court is hearing a plea against an order which dismissed a plea seeking restoration of Hindu temples at the Qutub Minar complex in the capital
Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is arguing. He is submitting before the court that the right to worship requires looking into and any public order which says otherwise is in the teeth of it #qutabminar
Judge: What is the purpose of the Places of Worship Act 1991.
Hari Shankar Jain is arguing, the Judge however asks one of the persons present there, “Mr. Ali, you cannot record these proceedings”. He asks him to delete them
#SupremeCourt to hear challenge by Government against Jharkhand High Court order directing Enforcement Directorate to submit documents of operations being conducted against alleged shell companies owned by the Chief Minister @HemantSorenJMM in a PIL filed by Shiv Shankar Sharma.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for the State of Jharkhand submitted that the petitioner in the Jharkhand High Court keeps on filing PILs and he doesn't disclose any of that, there has been rules in this regard.
Sibal: On April 22, the bench impleaded the Registrar of Companies as a party and this has not been in any application filed by the petitioner, this is done suo-moto.
SG Mehta submitted that the ASG was appearing for the Union of India and ED.