LawBeat Profile picture
May 30 14 tweets 12 min read
Gyanvapi dispute | #VaranasiCourt to resume hearing on the plea challenging maintainability of the suit filed by 5 women for performance of all rituals of Hindu deities within the "old temple complex" allegedly existing inside the mosque site.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi
The hearing will start at 2 pm before District and Sessions Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha. Counsel for both the parties have reached the courtroom.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi
Media entry is barred inside the Courtroom. The Anjuman Intezemia Masjid Committee is likely to continue its argument today. Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is appearing for the Hindu parties in the case.

#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi #VaranasiCourt
Only certain persons including 47 lawyers have been permitted to be present inside the courtroom.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi #VaranasiCourt
The hearing is ongoing. In the lobby outside the courtroom, peace prevails.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi #VaranasiCourt
Adv Abhay Nath Yadav for Masjid committee is placing his arguments before the Court. It is Muslim side's claim that the disputed site is a Waqf property and the instant suit is barred by Places of Worship Act 1991.
#GyanvapiMosque #GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing
To strengthen its argument, Mosque Committee is relying upon the case of Deen Mohammad Vs State Secretary (1937).
#GyanvapiMosque #GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing
In 1936, Deen Mohammad had filed a suit (Civil Suit No. 62) before a Varanasi Court for granting declaration that the disputed land was Waqf without impleading any member of the Hindu community.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing #GyanvapiMosque
Hearing for the day concludes. The matter will be next heard on July 4.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing #GyanvapiMosque
UPDATE: Court today asked the five women petitioners in the case to give 'in writing' that they will not leak the evidence to the media/general public which they are placing before the court.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing #GyanvapiMosque
Post today's hearing, Adv. Hari Shankar Jain with the women petitioner.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt #Gyanvapihearing #GyanvapiMosque
Post hearing, Hindu Side's counsel briefs media that today it was suggested that the evidence being placed before Court should not be made Public. However, petitioners have opposed it vehemently.
Court order awaited.
#GyanvapiCase #GyanvapiCase #Gyanvapi
Advocate @Vishnu_Jain1 briefs the media about today's hearing.
#Gyanvapicase #GyanVapiRow #VaranasiCourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

May 30
Nikhil Upadhyay, a law student, seeks impleadment in the #GyanvapCase before Varanasi District Court alleging that only those places are protected under Places of Worship Act, 1991 which were constructed in accordance with the personal law of person constructing them.
#gyanvapi
"Retrospective cutoff date cannot be fixed to legalize illegal acts of barbaric invaders as Hindu Law (Temple Character never changes) was ‘Law in force’ at the commencement of the Constitution by virtue
of Article 372(1)," he argues.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt
He further contends that Muslims cannot assert any right in respect of any piece of land claiming to be a Mosque unless it has been constructed on legally owned
and occupied virgin land.
#Gyanvapicase #VaranasiCourt
Read 8 tweets
May 30
BREAKING: A Special Bench of the Delhi High Court is to continue hearing Umar Khalid's bail plea post lunch at 2:15 today.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Here is a recap of the last date of hearing

'Can't Hold A Mini Trial On Whether Or Not You Met Tahir Hussain, Khalid Saifi': Delhi High Court In Umar Khalid Bail Plea
@tishya_saran
reports

lawbeat.in/news-updates/c…
Hearing begins.
Ms. Sanya Kumar J. appears for Umar Khalid.
Chargesheet is being read out. Portion on secret meeting in Seelampur between Khalid and other co accused is being read out.
Read 41 tweets
May 28
#AllahabadHighCourt holds that against any order u/S 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, the right to appeal u/S 16(1) is available 'not only' to the senior citizen and parents 'but also' to the children, relative, or other person too.
Section 16(1) reads, "Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal....." Image
Court said, "Maintenance has to be given by some person or institute or a juristic person and if such a maintenance is been granted, some person must be affected and thus, non-mentioning of the words in Section 16(1) is not a casus omissus, but it seems an accidental omission."
Read 4 tweets
May 28
Uttarakhand government has formed an expert committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge for examining and implementing Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the State.
#UCC #UniformCivilCode #Uttrakhand Image
The order by the State Home Department reads, "The Governor is pleased to approve the constitution of the following expert committee to examine and report on all relevant laws governing individual civil affairs of all citizens residing in the State of Uttarakhand...
...with amendments to the draft law or existing law, applicable laws relating to marriage, divorce, property rights, succession, adoption and maintenance and protection, etc and to examine and implement the Uniform Civil Code."
Read 4 tweets
May 24
A Delhi Court is hearing a plea against an order which dismissed a plea seeking restoration of Hindu temples at the Qutub Minar complex in the capital
Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is arguing. He is submitting before the court that the right to worship requires looking into and any public order which says otherwise is in the teeth of it #qutabminar
Judge: What is the purpose of the Places of Worship Act 1991.

Hari Shankar Jain is arguing, the Judge however asks one of the persons present there, “Mr. Ali, you cannot record these proceedings”. He asks him to delete them
Read 20 tweets
May 24
#SupremeCourt to hear challenge by Government against Jharkhand High Court order directing Enforcement Directorate to submit documents of operations being conducted against alleged shell companies owned by the Chief Minister @HemantSorenJMM in a PIL filed by Shiv Shankar Sharma.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for the State of Jharkhand submitted that the petitioner in the Jharkhand High Court keeps on filing PILs and he doesn't disclose any of that, there has been rules in this regard.
Sibal: On April 22, the bench impleaded the Registrar of Companies as a party and this has not been in any application filed by the petitioner, this is done suo-moto.

SG Mehta submitted that the ASG was appearing for the Union of India and ED.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(