LawBeat Profile picture
May 30 41 tweets 21 min read
BREAKING: A Special Bench of the Delhi High Court is to continue hearing Umar Khalid's bail plea post lunch at 2:15 today.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Here is a recap of the last date of hearing

'Can't Hold A Mini Trial On Whether Or Not You Met Tahir Hussain, Khalid Saifi': Delhi High Court In Umar Khalid Bail Plea
@tishya_saran
reports

lawbeat.in/news-updates/c…
Hearing begins.
Ms. Sanya Kumar J. appears for Umar Khalid.
Chargesheet is being read out. Portion on secret meeting in Seelampur between Khalid and other co accused is being read out.
Ms. Kumar - not a single witness has called this meeting a "secret" meeting. That is an addition made by the chargesheet.

Statement of witness "Sierra" is being read out.
Witness was a man who would occasionally go to the office to provide tea and snacks

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
reads out statement of another witness.

Kumar - your lordships will note that the statements of the witness are exactly identical.

Bhatnagar J. - So the statements corroborate each other?

Kumar - They are exactly identical in the way they describe the chain of events!
Kumar - These are S. 161 statements. The punctuation, the words used are identical. To have perfect recollection with the words is unnatural.

Bhatnagar J. - All this will be seen at the time of trial. Not at the stage of bail hearing
Kumar reads out statement of witness "ECHO"

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Kumar - Echo doesn't talk about any speech given by Umar Khalid in Seelampur in his sec. 161 CrPC statement.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Kumar - the evidence of Echo is also hearsay in as much as he has not heard what was said in the meeting. He has only heard of the contents of the meeting from someone else.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Like other witnesses, Echo also mentions that Natasha Narwal was present at the meeting. But CDR shows that she wasn't present that day in Seelampur.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
reads out S.164 statement of witness Delta

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
This was a witness who was in constant touch with the police and who would tell the police of any plans to protest.
Kumar - the witness was informing the police since January 2019 of everything going on. He also informed the police that women were being instigated to stock up red chilli powder, sticks, etc to attack. Yet the police fails to take any action.
Kumar - Delta is a witness who has been in constant touch with the police. He told the police of Gulfisha asking women to keep knives, acid, red chilli powder, etc. But the police fails to take action.. also makes no mention of any speech by Khalid inciting any offence.
Kumar: He neither mentions Umar Khalid nor talks about the meeting in sec. 161 CrPC statement. In sec. 164 Statement, within a period of six days, not only does he name Umar but also says that he gave provocative speech. Just like other witnesses, no details, nothing to show....
....that the speech was provocative.

Mr. Trideep Pais, appears.

Pais - Sorry milords.

Takes over the arguments.

#umarkhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Pais - milords the photos of this "secret" meeting have been taken from the Facebook account of a witness. This is a prosecution document and a conspitorial meeting. Would anyone who wanted to execute a conspiracy and take a selfie and put it on Facebook in this manner?
Pais reads out chargesheet, which states that the photo was taken by Syed Imran. Imran's phone was seized by the police and his Facebook data was downloaded.

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Pais - if this meeting is supposed to be "secret" and is a conspiracy, why would one take a picture of it and put it up on Facebook? Why would I tell a tea vendor or a biryani supplier my entire plan?

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Pais - the chargesheet also states that the police learnt of the secret meeting on 28th august. But the witness spoke about it in April! and other witnesses can be seen to have spoken about it before as well... the list is endless...
#UmarKhalid #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020
Pais - Please see the manner in which the chargesheet has been presented... I am not relying on any document outside the chargesheet but the manner in which the chargesheet has been presented shows that it is a fabrication!
#UmarKhalid #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020 #UAPA
Pais - Does the court jump to the conclusion that it was a Conspitorial meeting just because the chargesheet says so? Does the court not have even to look at the broad probabilities and see how nothing is disclosed? The impugned order reproduces the chargesheet allegations
Mridul J. - the point is whether a meeting was held or not? We have to look at the facts. the fact is there is a photo. The photo shows a meeting was held. We can't at this stage look at whether meeting was "secret" or "conspiratorial".
Mridul J. - some facts hide in plain sight! who is to say a conspiratorial meeting cant be held in a park! But we are not to look at any such facts. Whatever statements have been made by the witness, how much scrutiny can we put them through?
Pais - I don't place the witness statements for your lordship to discard or admit them! I only place it to show your lordships the picture from my point of view!

Mridul J.- You dont want us to look at the picture!
Mridul J. - You dont want us to look at the Facebook picture!

Pais - Milords that was a very nice pun.

Mridul J. - you are going into questions like why did Michelangelo paint the last supper? We are not on those facts at all.
Mridul J. - Let us go back to the Evidence Act. What is a conspiracy? Even if one of the co conspirators acts independently, it needn't be at your behest, it would still be held against you! that is the law!
Mridul J. - We just hope there is some end in sight! Alright we won't ask you any more questions!

Pais - No Milords in reading Watali sometime was taken
Pais: now comes the allegation of 17 February 2020. Your lordships have seen this in great detail. Your lordships had seen this speech in Amravati. This doesn't give rise to any offences alleged against me.

#UmarKhalid #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots2020 #UAPA
Justice Mridul: Speech is in bad taste, doesn't make it a terrorist act. You have made your point. If the case of the prosecution is premised on how offensive the speech was, that by itself won't constitute an offence. We will give them the opportunity.
Pais - milords S.161 statement of witnesses "James" and "Bond"
Mridul J. - Mr. Prasad were these names picked out of a hat?.... No because "Echo" and "Bravo" we understand is aviation parlance. But "James" "Bond" "Romeo" "Juliet"...Only one missing is Roger
Mridul J.: It may tantamount to defamation but it will not tantamount to a terrorist activity.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Pais now refers to statements of other witness named James.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Pais now on the allegation of "flurry of calls" made.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Pais: they are not telling you how much members of whatsapp group spoke to each other on previous days. They are just giving sample of one day. No witness. This is just an inference.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Mridul J.: The difficulty is that this matter has taken more time than we envisaged it would. Insofar as inviting our attention to chargesheet, you've done. Now only judgments are left.
Mridul J. : It's impossible for this bench to assemble everyday. We'll have to hear this after vacations now..We can only have it in the reopening now.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Mridul J. - We are hearing this matter on a daily basis. We know your client is in custody but so are so many others! they are in preventive custody! We have been adjourning their matters on a daily basis! Everyday! We cant do this on a daily basis.
Mridul J. - The prosecution hasn't even begun yet! We have to give them the same amount of time we give you to respond to the extensive arguments raised by you. They haven't even begun Mr. Pais.

#DelhiHighCourt #UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots
Matter listed for concluding arguments on behalf of the accused on July 4, at 2:15

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

May 30
Nikhil Upadhyay, a law student, seeks impleadment in the #GyanvapCase before Varanasi District Court alleging that only those places are protected under Places of Worship Act, 1991 which were constructed in accordance with the personal law of person constructing them.
#gyanvapi
"Retrospective cutoff date cannot be fixed to legalize illegal acts of barbaric invaders as Hindu Law (Temple Character never changes) was ‘Law in force’ at the commencement of the Constitution by virtue
of Article 372(1)," he argues.
#GyanvapiCase #VaranasiCourt
He further contends that Muslims cannot assert any right in respect of any piece of land claiming to be a Mosque unless it has been constructed on legally owned
and occupied virgin land.
#Gyanvapicase #VaranasiCourt
Read 8 tweets
May 30
Gyanvapi dispute | #VaranasiCourt to resume hearing on the plea challenging maintainability of the suit filed by 5 women for performance of all rituals of Hindu deities within the "old temple complex" allegedly existing inside the mosque site.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi
The hearing will start at 2 pm before District and Sessions Judge Dr. AK Vishvesha. Counsel for both the parties have reached the courtroom.
#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi
Media entry is barred inside the Courtroom. The Anjuman Intezemia Masjid Committee is likely to continue its argument today. Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is appearing for the Hindu parties in the case.

#GyanvapiHearing #Gyanvapi #VaranasiCourt
Read 14 tweets
May 28
#AllahabadHighCourt holds that against any order u/S 5 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007, the right to appeal u/S 16(1) is available 'not only' to the senior citizen and parents 'but also' to the children, relative, or other person too.
Section 16(1) reads, "Any senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be, aggrieved by an order of a Tribunal may, within sixty days from the date of the order, prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal....." Image
Court said, "Maintenance has to be given by some person or institute or a juristic person and if such a maintenance is been granted, some person must be affected and thus, non-mentioning of the words in Section 16(1) is not a casus omissus, but it seems an accidental omission."
Read 4 tweets
May 28
Uttarakhand government has formed an expert committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge for examining and implementing Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the State.
#UCC #UniformCivilCode #Uttrakhand Image
The order by the State Home Department reads, "The Governor is pleased to approve the constitution of the following expert committee to examine and report on all relevant laws governing individual civil affairs of all citizens residing in the State of Uttarakhand...
...with amendments to the draft law or existing law, applicable laws relating to marriage, divorce, property rights, succession, adoption and maintenance and protection, etc and to examine and implement the Uniform Civil Code."
Read 4 tweets
May 24
A Delhi Court is hearing a plea against an order which dismissed a plea seeking restoration of Hindu temples at the Qutub Minar complex in the capital
Advocate Hari Shankar Jain is arguing. He is submitting before the court that the right to worship requires looking into and any public order which says otherwise is in the teeth of it #qutabminar
Judge: What is the purpose of the Places of Worship Act 1991.

Hari Shankar Jain is arguing, the Judge however asks one of the persons present there, “Mr. Ali, you cannot record these proceedings”. He asks him to delete them
Read 20 tweets
May 24
#SupremeCourt to hear challenge by Government against Jharkhand High Court order directing Enforcement Directorate to submit documents of operations being conducted against alleged shell companies owned by the Chief Minister @HemantSorenJMM in a PIL filed by Shiv Shankar Sharma.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for the State of Jharkhand submitted that the petitioner in the Jharkhand High Court keeps on filing PILs and he doesn't disclose any of that, there has been rules in this regard.
Sibal: On April 22, the bench impleaded the Registrar of Companies as a party and this has not been in any application filed by the petitioner, this is done suo-moto.

SG Mehta submitted that the ASG was appearing for the Union of India and ED.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(