"The original building was a structure of the Din-i Ilahi faith."
& claimed, "Aurangzeb didn't break the Vishvanath Temple at Kashi. No farman talks of it."
Fallacies exposed in this thread
2/n The root of the Din-i illahi argument & many other non-historical ones comes from the opinions collected by Mary Searle-Chatterjee in 1993 (Religious division and the mythology of the past).
Check these snippets from doc. I've highlighted the Din-i Illahi part.
3/n So for the information of @KaleemulHafeez, even that argument what local Muslim gave to Mary held opinion that most certainly Aurangzeb had pulled down the structure for his hostility towards Akbar's religious policy.
So even Kaleemul need to do some readings before quoting.
4/n And Todarmal had nothing to do with building this Mandir for Din-i Illahi.
If that construction been under that very program, why it is nowhere spoken in primary source (Akbarnama) which talks about Din-i Illahi?
6/n Then you disputed going against even the original argument of "Din-i Illahi" that was obtained by Mary in 1993 which actually accepted demolition by Aurangzeb.
Here is the farman establishing demolition of "Vishwanath Mandir" at Kashi (Persian "Maasir-i-Alamgiri")
7/n The English translation by Jadunath Sarkar.
Key statement: "It was reported that, according to the Emperor's command, his officers had demolished the temple of Viswanath at Kashi."
8/n Dear @KaleemulHafeez , you blindly follow "Fatawa-E-Alamgiri" for Sharia, then what stops you to disbelieve Maasir-i-Alamgiri which clearly states destruction of Vishwanath Mandir?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/n As @akshaykumar , said in an interview that our text books only talk about Invaders & not prominent Indian Kings, usual offenders like @zoo_bear@ashoswai began to attack him personally.
In this thread, I expose their lies and how Akshay is correct.
2/n Zubair posts this page from NCERT History book for class VII and foolishly tried to mock @akshaykumar without knowing how lame he would end up being.
The chapter itself is called "The Delhi Sultans" as if no Rajas ruled the place.
3/n Interestingly the chapter doesn't makes a single mention of "Lal Kot" founded by Anangpal Tomar.
It completely misses to mention about the name Dillika, by which Delhi was known in the Tomar Period.
The chapter also talks least about findings beneath Purana Quila.
I’m not entertaining you, so no point being disappointed.
I said, that I’ll debunk each source one by one.
If you already knew that Ashokvadana isn’t true about Pushyamitra then why did you mention it as primary source?
Lengthy thread, because that’s how you analyse.
Where there is single source to prove of oral tradition?
So Buddhists were so weak that they couldn’t even write inscriptions? Ashoka was known for it.
“(...) If there were no Shivaji everyone would have been circumcised.”
Granthavali of Kavi Bhushan, quoted in (Oxford in India readings, Themes in Indian history.)
Kavi Bhushan was living in times of Shivaji
The earlier lines are mentioned below:
“The Muslims have destroyed all our temples; they are hoisting ‘Ali’s flag everywhere; rajas have fled; everywhere one sees (Muslim) pirs (saints), and payghambars (prophets), nowhere Hindu sants and sddhis; Kashi has lost its splendor and there are mosques in Mathura.”
In his opinion it was Ch. Shivaji who could save Bharat from Islamisation.
Here is one more poem by great Kavi Bhushan at Birla House :
Important thread wrt claim that the element found is not a #Shivling but a remnant of a fountain.
First I'm sharing arguments to assert it to be fountain is vague (from perspective of a student of Architecture).
Parties may refute it or use in court if found substantial.
Well, the structure must be of the era of Aurangzeb should it be part of "Fountain Jet" or "fawwara."
Then one needs to look at the working of landscape architecture of that era. This paper gives a very good details & I shall use it as source jstor.org/stable/4415632…
When Babur came to Bharat (Hindustan in his words), he found only "Saqia" (rehet) the most effective method to pull water up.
The paper also explains that "gravity" was major method & when water-body was close-by (Ganga here) , it was the source.
Pre-set notion shouldn’t supersede existing records.
The Sringeri Records State:
“The positive reply from Parasuram Bhau (...) plunder of Sringeri was not due to any deliberate intention on his part, but a result of the predatory habits of the Pindaris in his contingent.”
Further @honshomyoshu , the Sringeri website doesn’t glorify Tipu as you claim but just gives passing reference that Hyder Ali & Tipu we’re drawn towards Peetham & saw Acharya as Guru.
Now, as per the mutt’s record that Marathas never intended to do what the Pindaris had done and at the same time also tells us that Tipu was donating to the mutt, but some observations give an interesting perspective.
Have you read Raja Kesavadas by VR Parameswaran Pillai?