1/n @KaleemulHafeez , on @gauravcsawant 's show #IndiaFirst made an argument as below:

"The original building was a structure of the Din-i Ilahi faith."
& claimed, "Aurangzeb didn't break the Vishvanath Temple at Kashi. No farman talks of it."

Fallacies exposed in this thread
2/n The root of the Din-i illahi argument & many other non-historical ones comes from the opinions collected by Mary Searle-Chatterjee in 1993 (Religious division and the mythology of the past).

Check these snippets from doc. I've highlighted the Din-i Illahi part.
3/n So for the information of @KaleemulHafeez, even that argument what local Muslim gave to Mary held opinion that most certainly Aurangzeb had pulled down the structure for his hostility towards Akbar's religious policy.

So even Kaleemul need to do some readings before quoting.
4/n And Todarmal had nothing to do with building this Mandir for Din-i Illahi.

If that construction been under that very program, why it is nowhere spoken in primary source (Akbarnama) which talks about Din-i Illahi?
5/n Dear Mr @KaleemulHafeez , here is the link to Vol 3 of Akbarnama which has a part dealing with Ibadatkhana archive.org/details/in.ern…

Pl find me the thing mentioned.
6/n Then you disputed going against even the original argument of "Din-i Illahi" that was obtained by Mary in 1993 which actually accepted demolition by Aurangzeb.

Here is the farman establishing demolition of "Vishwanath Mandir" at Kashi (Persian "Maasir-i-Alamgiri")
7/n The English translation by Jadunath Sarkar.

Key statement: "It was reported that, according to the Emperor's command, his officers had demolished the temple of Viswanath at Kashi."
8/n Dear @KaleemulHafeez , you blindly follow "Fatawa-E-Alamgiri" for Sharia, then what stops you to disbelieve Maasir-i-Alamgiri which clearly states destruction of Vishwanath Mandir?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

Jun 2
1/n As @akshaykumar , said in an interview that our text books only talk about Invaders & not prominent Indian Kings, usual offenders like @zoo_bear @ashoswai began to attack him personally.

In this thread, I expose their lies and how Akshay is correct.

I dare them to respond
2/n Zubair posts this page from NCERT History book for class VII and foolishly tried to mock @akshaykumar without knowing how lame he would end up being.

The chapter itself is called "The Delhi Sultans" as if no Rajas ruled the place. Image
3/n Interestingly the chapter doesn't makes a single mention of "Lal Kot" founded by Anangpal Tomar.

It completely misses to mention about the name Dillika, by which Delhi was known in the Tomar Period.

The chapter also talks least about findings beneath Purana Quila.
Read 21 tweets
May 26
Namaskar!

I’m not entertaining you, so no point being disappointed.
I said, that I’ll debunk each source one by one.
If you already knew that Ashokvadana isn’t true about Pushyamitra then why did you mention it as primary source?
Lengthy thread, because that’s how you analyse.
What I this, “Oral tradition ‘may’ go to...”

Where there is single source to prove of oral tradition?
So Buddhists were so weak that they couldn’t even write inscriptions? Ashoka was known for it.

Buddhists are bright, don’t show them as lame.
Heights of ignorance.
I analysed the page that how this persecution thing is a myth.

History study is about analysis not blind selective reading.

So in that case do you accept that Ashoka persecuted massively in name of Buddhism (Ashokvadana states it & so does archeology)?
Read 4 tweets
May 26
1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within you @TenzingLamsang

Now that you use DN Jha's source to prove Buddhist Persecution by Hindus, let me unpin each one one by one.

You may respond should you have substance.
2/n Let's first pick #Divyadanda

What an irony, Tenzing that even this Buddhist text is written in Sanskrit, the language blamed to be of Brahmin Persecutors.

Anyways, let's focus on main thing.
3/n To begin with, let me talk of Etienne Lamotte, the eminent Historian who observed as below:

"To judge from the documents, Pushyamitra must be acquitted through lack of proof."

...and lets move further.
Read 37 tweets
May 23
“(...) If there were no Shivaji everyone would have been circumcised.”

Granthavali of Kavi Bhushan, quoted in (Oxford in India readings, Themes in Indian history.)

Kavi Bhushan was living in times of Shivaji

The earlier lines are mentioned below:
“The Muslims have destroyed all our temples; they are hoisting ‘Ali’s flag everywhere; rajas have fled; everywhere one sees (Muslim) pirs (saints), and payghambars (prophets), nowhere Hindu sants and sddhis; Kashi has lost its splendor and there are mosques in Mathura.”
In his opinion it was Ch. Shivaji who could save Bharat from Islamisation.

Here is one more poem by great Kavi Bhushan at Birla House :
Read 10 tweets
May 17
Important thread wrt claim that the element found is not a #Shivling but a remnant of a fountain.

First I'm sharing arguments to assert it to be fountain is vague (from perspective of a student of Architecture).

Parties may refute it or use in court if found substantial.
Well, the structure must be of the era of Aurangzeb should it be part of "Fountain Jet" or "fawwara."

Then one needs to look at the working of landscape architecture of that era. This paper gives a very good details & I shall use it as source jstor.org/stable/4415632…
When Babur came to Bharat (Hindustan in his words), he found only "Saqia" (rehet) the most effective method to pull water up.

The paper also explains that "gravity" was major method & when water-body was close-by (Ganga here) , it was the source.
Read 7 tweets
May 4
Pre-set notion shouldn’t supersede existing records.

The Sringeri Records State:

“The positive reply from Parasuram Bhau (...) plunder of Sringeri was not due to any deliberate intention on his part, but a result of the predatory habits of the Pindaris in his contingent.”
Further @honshomyoshu , the Sringeri website doesn’t glorify Tipu as you claim but just gives passing reference that Hyder Ali & Tipu we’re drawn towards Peetham & saw Acharya as Guru.
Now, as per the mutt’s record that Marathas never intended to do what the Pindaris had done and at the same time also tells us that Tipu was donating to the mutt, but some observations give an interesting perspective.

Have you read Raja Kesavadas by VR Parameswaran Pillai?
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(