So Keir Starmer has written a piece in the right-wing non-dom billionaire-owned ex-employer of Boris Johnson, The Telegraph.
It's behind a paywall, so I reproduce the text below, & add my own two penn'orth on the contested concepts of #patriotism & #nationalism at the end.
"The #PlatinumJubilee is a chance to celebrate our extraordinary monarch and the values she represents
The Jubilee weekend isn’t just an opportunity for us to reflect on the 70 years since Her Majesty’s accession to the throne – although it will, of course, be that."
"And it isn’t simply a chance for a country wearied by the extraordinary circumstances of the past few years to let its hair down – although it is, of course, your patriotic duty to do just that."
"No, the first #PlatinumJubilee in our nation’s history is a chance to celebrate a truly extraordinary Queen, to reflect on the difference she has made to her country, and to consider what our Elizabethan age has meant – and what it will mean for our future."
"Over the coming days, there will be time for rich explorations of the history. How Her Majesty has guided us through turbulent times and stood alongside us during the good and the bad."
"But I want to reflect on the values the Queen represents & how they have made her such a popular, unifying & enduring figure. We live in a time in which our attitudes towards authority have changed. The deferential culture of the early part of Her Majesty’s reign has long gone."
"But the Queen has been able to rise above much of the archness and cynicism: the hope and surety she represents sometimes feel like a throwback to that former age. The admiration people have for her goes far beyond the typical relationship between monarch and people."
"There is no great secret as to how she has managed this. Her Majesty’s commitment to duty and her passion for furthering our country on the world stage have not just benefited each of us – they have also conferred on her the respect and love of people here and across the world."
"She has shown us that integrity, hard work & selflessness are the antidote to pessimism."
"It is a truism that with great power comes great responsibility, but the Queen’s reign has been a continuous reminder of the way to deal with that – to block out the noise & get on with the job at hand."
"The Western world has changed beyond recognition since the 1950s. This has led to fundamental questions about what it means to be a citizen and what it means to be patriotic."
"Britain has been no outlier in this. Her Majesty’s constant presence – a bridge between different eras – has been an important part in helping us to wrestle with those questions."
"That Britain has at every juncture rejected extremism is in no small part due to our idea of who we are as a people: an idea borne of a sense of stability that cannot exist without strong institutions."
"Watching last year’s Euro 2020 tournament, it was striking not just how many of the home nations’ players were first, second or third-generation immigrants but how many of those wearing replica shirts in the stands or the pubs were as well."
"This weekend’s celebrations will feel the same. I encourage everyone to get involved – and I endorse this newspaper’s call for local authorities to try to ensure that as many events can take place and as many people can celebrate as possible."
"Just as at the Queen’s coronation in 1953, our country is at a crossroads. Just as then, we have gone through great change. And just as then, there are siren voices who claim that our best days are behind us."
"But they will once again be proven wrong. The Britain that is emerging at this #PlatinumJubilee is one that is again ready to move on from the tribulations of recent years, stronger for its experiences, and more than able to seize the opportunities ahead."
"A new patriotism, one that is easy, self-confident and inclusive, is being born all around us."
"Just as the Queen has led us through the past 70 years, all that she has taught us – about duty, tolerance, humility and responsibility – will continue to guide us into this next era. We are a better, brighter country because of her."
"Our history is richer, our future built on firmer foundations and our great country made greater still by her rule.
Now that’s something worth celebrating."
The Telegraph reminds readers that "Sir Keir Starmer is leader of the @UKLabour Party"
Starmer knows how powerful the non-dom billionaire-owned Telegraph is in shaping public opinion, & I understand why Starmer believes he has to directly address Telegraph readers - although the likelihood of any Telegraph reader ever voting for @UKLabour is, at best, remote.
Couple of things to note straightway:
First, the slightly odd suggestion that it is the country's (by which he presumably means the British people's) "patriotic duty" to "let its hair down", & his call "to reflect on the difference (if any) she has made to her country".
Second, Starmer claims "Her Majesty has guided us through turbulent times", without giving any examples.
How, precisely, has she done this? Through the Queen's speech, watched last year by 9 million people? I'm not sure there are tangible examples to give.
Third, while accepting deferential attitudes to authority have changed over the years, he says he wants to "reflect on the values the Queen represents", initially offering 'rising above cynicism' & "commitment to duty" & "passion for furthering our country on the world stage".
In a clear dig at Boris Johnson, the other values he sees the Queen representing are "integrity, hard work & selflessness", which are fine, but then he cryptically adds that they "are the antidote to pessimism." As Johnson constantly reveals, blind optimism can be catastrophic.
When Starmer claims the Queen's way of dealing with responsibility is a reminder to "block out the noise & get on with the job at hand", it hints at his leadership style - one which, echoing Johnson, runs close to dismissing heartfelt concerns as 'mere noise'.
Regarding the "fundamental questions about what it means to be a citizen" he talks about "rejecting (unspecified) extremism" - presumably including anything departing from the establishment's preferred order - & clumsily connects this to (again unspecified) "strong institutions".
He refers to the 2020 Euros & the fact that the "home nations’ players were first, second or third-generation immigrants" but instead of focussing on the players' stance against racism he instead signalled integration by referencing immigrant descendants "wearing replica shirts".
He then moves on to say "the country is at a crossroads", but instead of spelling out that this is due to the @Conservatives' 14-year-long catastrophic mismanagement of Britain's society, democracy & economy, he warns of "siren voices who claim that our best days are behind us."
Starmer is unclear who is claiming "Britain's best days are behind us" - the nostalgic backward-looking right-wing, or the left-wing who yearn for more equal times? Starmer's rhetorical style is reminiscent of Labour's disastrous 'constructive ambiguity' Brexit rhetoric.
Nodding to leave voters, his rallying call is that "the Britain that is emerging at this Platinum Jubilee is one that is again ready to move on from the tribulations of recent years, stronger for its experiences, & more than able to seize the opportunities ahead."
Ultimately, Starmer has actually said next to nothing concrete or specific about this "new patriotism" - saying it is "easy" & "self-confident" is meaningless. perhaps the only thing separating him from the Right is his vague commitment to the "new patriotism" being "inclusive".
He ends with the highly questionable claim, aimed directly at the aging Telegraph readership, that "We are a better, brighter country" because of the Queen, & that "our history is richer, our future built on firmer foundations & our great country made greater still by her rule".
Imho, this is not just a largely pointless PR exercise, that says naff all, designed to calm the nerves of Telegraph readers who won't vote for him anyway, but much more importantly, it is a wasted opportunity. Here's what I think he should have addressed:
🧵 Online #Incel communities foster misogyny, resentment & extremism, which have led to multiple murderous attacks in the US & UK, motivated by hatred toward women.
Their echo chambers also amplify mental health issues like isolation & anger, radicalizing vulnerable men & boys.
In the US, proven murders attributable to incels include: Elliot Rodger, who killed 6 & injured 14 in a shooting & stabbing spree; Lyndon McLeod shot & killed 5; & Mauricio Garcia shot & killed 8 & injured 7.
In the UK, Jake Davison shot & killed 5, including a 3-year-old girl.
Farage defended his Reform UK MP who was jailed for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend (which wasn't disclosed to voters before he was elected), & in 2014, he dismissed as "just a joke" an MEP's comment that beating women "helps bring wives back to Earth."
A 🧵 about how spurious and inflammatory claims, based on unevidenced cherry-picked data, are passed off as truth by partisan private limited companies and used as a weapon to divide voters and to scapegoat and demonise migrants.
At 1.32pm on Monday 10th March, The Telegraph published the claim that based on “the first data analysis of its kind. Data from the Ministry of Justice, obtained under freedom of information laws,” shows that “Foreigners [are] convicted of nearly a quarter of sex crimes.”
Chris Philp, shadow home secretary, said the figures were “shocking.”
Shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, said: “Not only is mass migration making us poorer, but this data proves it’s also making us dramatically less safe.”
Democracy is under attack. As with the US, Italy is 1 of 5 European Govts undermining the rule of law ‘in nearly all aspects’, with changes to the judiciary & a “heavy intolerance to media criticism”, fueling Europe’s deepening “democratic recession”.
A report by Civil Liberties Union for Europe said Italy was one of five “dismantlers” – with Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania & Slovakia – that “intentionally undermine the rule of law in nearly all aspects”.
The report highlights judicial systems subject to political manipulation, weak law enforcement against corruption, overuse of fast-track legislative procedures, harassment of journalists & growing restrictions on peaceful protests.
Many of Britain's most vocal 'anti-establishment' voices attended some of the most expensive schools on earth.
These broken boys masquerade as 'anti-elite' while serving the interests of the ultrarich by turning working class people against each other using 'Divide & Rule'.
Moscow born Konstantin Vadimovich Kisin came to the UK aged 11 & was sent to Clifton College boarding school (current fees: up to £18,360/term).
He recently said about Rishi Sunak "He’s a brown Hindu; how is he English?" He's a regular speaker at Paul Marshall's ARC conference.
Rupert James Graham Lowe was sent to Radley College, an all-boys independent boarding school (current fees: up to £19,200/term).
Lowe worked in the City of London for companies such as Morgan Grenfell, Deutsche Bank and Barings Bank.
My own summary is above, but journalist @gilduran76 - of the brilliant #FrameLab - has now written his own summary, review and interpretation of it, which I reproduce with a few links and commentary, below.
To fully understand Silicon Valley’s project to destroy democracy, read 'The Sovereign Individual: How to Survive and Thrive During the Collapse of the Welfare State.'
In 1999, it was rebranded as 'The Sovereign Individual: Mastering the Transition to the Information Age.'
Life was demonstrably worse in the 1979 than it is today.
Zymunt Bauman calls this yearning for an imagined past, ‘retrotopia’, in which the ‘Volk’ (the ‘simple folk’, who Reform UK claim to represent) are constructed as homogenous, Christian, white, & ‘indigenous’.
Life was demonstrably inferior in the 1970s compared to today for almost everyone in England.
Life expectancy in the UK in 1980 was 71 for men and 77 for women. By 2019, life expectancy at birth in England had increased to 79 years for men & 83.5 for women.
1. Economic Hardship
In 1979, the UK economy was struggling with high inflation, unemployment, and a budget deficit. This eroded purchasing power, making essentials like food, clothing, and housing more expensive relative to wages. "Stagflation" was a significant problem.