2/Let’s start with L1. L1 radiates to the groin. I remember that b/c the number 1 is, well, um…phallic. So the phallic number 1 radiates to the groin.
3/Let’s skip to L3 for a second. I remember L3 is to the knee—easy, it rhymes!
4/Ok, back to L2. Two is the number between 1 and 3, so the distribution of L2 is between the distributions of L1 and L3—and between the groin and knee is the thigh. L2 radiates to the thigh. It’s not the catchiest way to remember it, but it works.
5/L4 radiates to the calf. I remember this bc the number 4 looks like the calf, with the top part of the 4 looking like a bulging gastroc & the bottom part of the four is the rest of the calf connecting to the ankle. Don’t we all wish we had bulging gastrocs like the number 4!
6/L5 radiates to the big toe. So I have the little rhyme “Five is to the big guy!” L5 is also foot drop. So I remember big guys are heavy, and heavy gravity = drop. If I hear the history “foot drop,” I never stop looking until I have traced out the entire L5 nerve root.
7/Finally, S1 radiates to the side of the foot. I remember this bc both S1 & Side start w/S.
So now you know where in the lumbar spine to look when a patient says the pain radiates down the leg & hopefully remembering the lumbar radicular distributions won’t cause you any pain!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Need help reading spine imaging? I’ve got your back!
It’s as easy as ABC!
A thread about an easy mnemonic you can use on every single spine study you see to increase your speed & make sure you never miss a thing!
2/A is for alignment
Look for: (1) Unstable injuries
(2) Malalignment that causes early degenerative change. Abnormal motion causes spinal elements to abnormally move against each other, like grinding teeth wears down teeth—this wears down the spine
3/B is for bones.
On CT, the most important thing to look for w/bones is fractures. You may see focal bony lesions, but you may not
On MR, it is the opposite—you can see marrow lesions easily but you may or may not see edema associated w/fractures if the fracture is subtle
@TheAJNR 2/Vascular cognitive impairment, or its most serious form, vascular dementia, used to be called multi-infarct dementia.
It was thought dementia directly resulted from brain volume loss from infarcts, w/the thought that 50-100cc of infarcted related volume loss caused dementia
@TheAJNR 3/But that’s now outdated. We now know vascular dementia results from diverse pathologies that all share a common vascular origin.
It’s possible to lose little volume from infarct & still result in dementia.
So if infarcts are common—which contribute to vascular dementia?
@TheAJNR 2/In the lumbar spine, it is all about the degree of canal narrowing & room for nerve roots.
In the cervical spine, we have another factor to think about—the cord.
Cord integrity is key. No matter the degree of stenosis, if the cord isn’t happy, the patient won’t be either
@TheAJNR 3/Cord flattening, even w/o canal stenosis, can cause myelopathy.
No one is quite sure why.
Some say it’s b/c mass effect on static imaging may be much worse dynamically, some say repetitive microtrauma, & some say micro-ischemia from compression of perforators