Ron Coleman Profile picture
Jun 3 4 tweets 2 min read
FYI, I am going to sign off for the day shortly, and not only for the usual Shabbos break: Saturday night this week is the beginning of the (two-day) festival of Shavuos, meaning that I am going to leave you to take care of yourselves for THREE DAYS! >
I'm not going to tell you I'm worried sick over this EVEN THOUGH I OBVIOUSLY AM.

But there is nothing to be done about it. You are going to have to get by on everyone else's lukewarm takes and midwit content until Monday night. >
And I am going to have to hope and pray that THIS TIME you don't let them start another plague or join some war or get into the liquor cabinet AGAIN.

But I am leaving you, at the very precipe of my 72-hour departure, with THIS: >
An almost nearly unprecedented THIRD EXCERPT from a #ColemanNation episode - the one I've been going on about all week with @CountDankulaTV of course (full ep here )

THIS is the COMPLETE singularity connecting the Dank Count, #censorship & @theslants!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ron Coleman

Ron Coleman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RonColeman

May 5
This is about an account that is

LITERALLY

nothing but an antisemitic troll account

whose name stands for "The Jewish Question"

(a term you may heard): Image
Now anyone who has followed me for any amount of time knows that for all my talk about free speech, I am n not a free speech absolutist. Nor do I think any platform has to put up with harassment or even a reasonably comprehensible and balanced definition of "hate speech" >
I don't do a lot of tattling, but I do report gross antisemitic trolling.

I did not say I report antisemites or even eruptions of poor taste or prejudice. I don't require everyone, even everyone I associate with, to love all mankind all the time . >
Read 6 tweets
May 3
In virtually ZERO circumstances relevant in 2022.

And that's why this liar blocked responses
Someone read this brief by the @cjvalues to Nurse Blimi

skip the hard words though - it's @MarcusBlimi

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/1…
Read 4 tweets
May 3
If you'll leak a draft SCOTUS opinion while serving in the most desirable, privileged post attainable by a young law school graduate -

at the very dawn of your career -

you'll do *anything* based on your own definition of expediency
There's nothing I repeat as often to clients and prospective clients concerned about confidentiality (often including anonymity) is that as lawyers, maintaining confidences is our single most important task. >
Even if you take the most jaundiced view of lawyers and our ethics, every one of us knows that improperly betraying client confidences is likely a one-way ticket to discipline, including potential disbarment. law.ua.edu/pubs/jlp_files…
Read 6 tweets
Apr 27
@npfandos Wow.
@npfandos They don't kid around, New York Democrats
@npfandos Wow, @DavidLat - isn't this what you would call a major #benchslap back in the day? And to a colleague on the same court 😯
Read 7 tweets
Apr 27
A friend just asked me, well what do you, if you're running a social media platform, with the fact that so many countries do have "hate speech" regulations and other forms of censorship?

This is a problem as old as the world wide web, of course.

My view is this: >
If you want a platform that complies with every regime's content regulation standards, you can. But you're going to trim away so much "offensive" content, as designated by one view or another, you end up with one hell of a bland conversation. And it will only get more bland. >
And not only bland as in uninteresting, unentertaining and un-fun: The forum will lose all capacity for functioning as an agent of change - change of any kind, or, worse, change of certain forbidden kinds. Not "disruption," that's for sure.

And THAT is what these regimes want.>
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(