1/ A new blog post by @chainlink was just published on $LINK staking

Lot’s of new information was presented, including a roadmap and initial implementation details

In this thread, I’ll break down what you need to know 👇
blog.chain.link/chainlink-stak…
2/ First it’s worth setting some context, as staking is a broad term in crypto

Chainlink Staking introduces a new layer of cryptoeconomic security by applying rewards and penalties to incentivize the network’s proper operation
3/ With #Chainlink Staking, there are four long-term goals

These serve as guiding principles in its development and as the pillars on which the success of staking will be defined
4/ Goal one: Increase the cryptoeconomic security and user assurances of Chainlink services

$LINK tokens are locked up, and if an oracle network misperforms, that $LINK stake can be slashed (taken away) and redistributed to the affected users

Attacks become more expensive
5/ Goal two: Enable community participation in the Chainlink network

Both node operators and regular tokenholders can directly participate in staking

This includes being rewarded for raising alerts if an oracle network misperforms

Token and community are very much needed
6/ Goal three: Generate sustainable rewards from real long-term use

Native token emissions in $LINK will create an initial base level of rewards for stakers

Over time, a greater portion of rewards will be sourced from user fees and other non-emission based sources
7/ Goal four: empower node operators to access higher-value jobs by staking

As node operators approach parity in terms of performance, they will begin to compete for jobs and revenue by how much $LINK they can stake

This results in a highly robust reputation system
8/ With these goals in mind, it’s important to note that Chainlink staking will evolve over time

The initial implementation planned for later this year will be focused on creating a simple and secure foundation

This allows feedback to be collected and assumptions to be tested
9/ The rollout of staking will be very similar to rollout of previous services

Price Feeds started with a single feed run by 3 nodes and scaled to a thousand feeds across 12 chains and supported by 50 nodes

This allows risks and opportunities to be identified before scaling up
10/ Following this approach, staking will evolve across multiple versions

As a first, @chainlink provided a roadmap detailing the prioritization and release milestones for each version 👀
11/ Chainlink Staking v0.1 is the version that will be released later this year

While staking v1 and v2 will be subsequent releases

Naturally, much of the specific details in the blog are focused on the v0.1 release and how it will evolve
12/ The initial v0.1 launch will focus on introducing a reputation framework and alerting system, key requirements for slashing in v1

To ensure robustness, these systems will track the performance of the $ETH/USD Data Feed on Ethereum Mainnet
13/ Importantly, stakers can raise an alert and get rewarded if they detect the $ETH/USD feed has not met the conditions of its SLA agreement

These alerting conditions will initially be around uptime, but expand in scope in later versions
14/ Once an alert is raised, an adjudication smart contract will verify the SLA conditions were breached

Afterwards, a reward to the alerter will be issued and results of the alert fed into the reputation systems

At-fault node operators will have their reputation updated
15/ In staking v1, the reputation system will expand to track a greater number of key metrics around the performance of node operators

Additionally in v1, slashing will be introduced to increase the penalties for an oracle network breaking the SLA agreement’s terms
16/ Now onto the juicy details; participation and rewards

The initial staking pool in v0.1 will be capped in size with distinct allotments:

1. Node operators
2. Community members
3. Coordinator of oracle networks

This means tokenholders will be able to stake directly
17/ The pool size in v0.1 will start at 25M $LINK, with the goal of scaling to 75M $LINK in the months after launch

With future versions, the pool size further increase in size and expand to additional Data Feeds and oracle services
18/ To fill the community allotment, a fair entry mechanism will be used

Emphasis is given that long-term token holders will be prioritized 👀

Node operators who service Data Feeds will have their own allotments to fill, with a third-party delegation system being explored
19/ Stakers participating in v0.1 will have their $LINK locked until at least the release of v1

With v1, stakers can choose commitment periods of varying lengths
20/ Initial emissions based rewards available to stakers in v0.1 will target an annualized reward rate of up to 5%

With v1, annualized rewards will vary based on user fees and the length of the commitment period

Longer commitment periods will earn a greater share of rewards
21/ Additionally, stakers in v0.1 will be eligible to earn benefits from the Partner Growth Program (PGP)

#Chainlinked projects will provide various benefits to stakers in order to accelerate their growth and align incentives

An initial release in v0.1, full release in v1
22/ As staking transitions to v1, user fees will begin to be shared with stakers

This coincides with the introduction of slashing and the cryptoeconomic security it provides

Loss protection is also being explored for v2, serving as an additional source of rewards
23/ So in summary, Chainlink Staking will be evolve over multiple releases

First starting with solid foundation and then introducing additional functionalities as the the system becomes more proven

This is how #Chainlink scales to becoming a global standard
24/ Staking is truly the start of a new era for $LINK tokenomics and long-term cryptoeconomic security

I’ve only scratched the surface with this thread, I highly recommend you dive into the blog post to learn more

Lots of information to absorb
25/ Shameless end-tweet promotional plug

If you enjoyed this thread, give it a like and retweet to help break down the information asymmetry

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChainLinkGod.eth

ChainLinkGod.eth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChainLinkGod

Jun 6
If smart contracts become the dominant form of digital agreements

Which they will because they’re superior to paper promises in every way

Then society will become more trust-minimized. transparent, and economically free

Fuck the ponzi meta-games, this is why I’m in crypto
It helps to zoom out every once in a while

People’s trust in traditional institutions are at an all-time-low, and there’s good reason for that

As the global economy continues to show its systemic cracks, demand for a viable alternative will become louder and louder
Nobody will care about your hot-potato ponzi speculation games

That just keeps the degens distracted and helps stress test the infrastructure

Ethereum, Chainlink, Rollups, etc were created to facilitate trust-minimized interactions between mutually non-trusting entities
Read 7 tweets
Jun 1
In its current state, I don’t see how $OP will capture value either

Optimism’s sequencer revenue will go to funding public goods, rather than flowing to tokenholders

Token holders will get to choose where inflationary rewards are directed and say yes to upgrades
The docs argue that value accrues to tokenholders because they benefit from public goods being funded

However, everyone benefits from public goods, regardless if you’re a tokenholder or not

So why hold the token unless you’re extremely passionate about governance?
There is a positive virtuous cycle:

Demand for blockspace -> more sequencer revenue -> funding for public goods -> Optimism as a network improves -> more demand for blockspace

But it’s unclear how the success of Optimism translates to the success of $OP in this current version
Read 4 tweets
May 30
.@mirror_protocol has just been exploited again due to Terra Classic validators reporting the price of the new Terra 2.0 $LUNA coin (~$9.80) instead of the original Terra Classic $LUNC coin (~$0.0001)

This is a massive operations failure
terra.stake.id/#/
Just two days out I pointed out how the $LUNA -> $LUNC rebranding is example of why oracle networks are dynamic and require an administrator role

It's to handle exactly situations like these
It seems the root cause was that Terra Classic validators were running an outdated version of the oracle software
Read 4 tweets
May 27
“Complaining about a problem without proposing a solution is called whining” - Teddy Roosevelt

Effective constructive criticism involves offering a solution in order to achieve positive outcome

Without such signal, all you are providing is noise
Best case scenario, it’s a good solution and it’s implemented to improve a system or process

Worse case scenario, the solution is unsuitable but it creates a conversation

This conversation sets context for the conditions and limitations that resulted in the initial approach
Future proposed solutions can be refined to address the perceived issue

Or ultimately people understand that the current approach is the most optimal for current conditions

This is how systems/processes improve over time, complaining alone is not an effective means of change
Read 13 tweets
May 26
If you think the bots on Twitter today are bad

You have no idea the scale of bot farms that will exist to value-drain play2earn games
I have first-hand experience on how bots can wreck an in-game economy

Catching them is continuous game of cat of mouse

Bots aren’t illegal, nor are they really unethical, they just are

It’s similar to MEV searchers in a lot of ways actually, probably will be the same entities
Yet another reason way privacy-preserving identity protocols will be needed to scale the ecosystem

Basically a sybil-resistance problem at the most basic level

Otherwise I don’t see how bots won’t just decimate P2E games like Alameda does to DeFi farms
Read 6 tweets
May 23
1/ Stablecoins are the Trojan Horse that will bring smart contracts to the masses

Why?

They’re the probably the first and only real-world use-case of crypto today that is fully sustainable and rapidly scaling

A 🧵 on #Stablecoins and how they’ll take over the global economy
2/ Stablecoins are fundamentally a simple concept

A blockchain-based token whose value is pegged to another currency (typically the US dollar)

This results a superior form of fiat:

Programmable
Permissionless
Borderless
Low-cost
Fast settlement
Interoperable
Highly liquid
3/ Fully collateralized stabecoins can achieve these desired properties without external incentives

The economics incentives of DeFi have helped fuel their growth (subsidized yield)

But ponzinomics are not required for $USDT, $USDC, $BUSD, $DAI to exist and thrive
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(