Have you ever wished to have access to 51,404 observations from 69 countries (28 nationally representative samples) from Global North/South to analyze & study the social & moral psychology of #COVID19?

#OpenScience for the win!

Preprint & Materials: doi.org/10.31234/osf.i…

🧵 World map showing the sampl...All moral and social psycho...Abstract of our paper on th...Correlation matrices for su...
As part of the ICSMP (icsmp-covid19.netlify.app), we wrote a paper describing our survey methodology, sharing survey materials, raw/cleaned data, code & translations (osf.io/tfsza/) & data visualization interface/Shiny app: icsmp.shinyapps.io/icsmp_covid19/

doi.org/10.31234/osf.i… Authors list of ICSMP data ...Authors list of ICSMP data ...A screenshot of the ICSMP d...A screenshot of the ICSMP d...
In our reproducible report, we share code for all our plots & tables hoping it can serve as an open resource for research and education #OpenData #OER

flavioazevedo.com/stats-and-r-bl…

doi.org/10.31234/osf.i… Graph depicting cross-cultu...Graph depicting cross-cultu...Graph depicting cross-cultu...A table showing sample size...
Thanks to all ICSMP researchers (tagged below) & special shout out to Tomislav Pavlović, Gabriel Rêgo, Ceren Ay, Biljana Gjoneska, ​@TomWEtienne, Robert Ross, @SchoeneggerPhil, @PolPsychKent @bjarkigron @ValerioCapraro @PauloBoggio & @jayvanbavel! 🙏💪

doi.org/10.31234/osf.i…
Tagging folks from the International Collaboration on the Social & Moral Psychology of COVID-19 (in no particular order):

@TomWEtienne @ondrij @psicologoMonroy @RolfZwaan @_onurcanyilmaz @mint_lab @PsychFarmer @hadyba_ @DanielVastfjall @jedilab_liu @tinghog @linakoppel

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Flavio Azevedo 🇧🇷 #BlackLivesMatter

Flavio Azevedo 🇧🇷 #BlackLivesMatter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Flavio_Azevedo_

Mar 5, 2019
Thank you, @NathanKalmoe, for once more engaging with our work. I feel privileged to have the opportunity to discuss how both of our works differ/intersect. As you invited and welcomed my retorque, here are some additional thoughts.

(1/gazillion)
I say additional because there was a thread of this article's findings:


And a first pass on a few topics here with @ChrisPolPsych @ntdPhD
In this iteration, you focused on samples, distributions, sophistication measures and interpretation. While the latter is always somewhat subjective, I see the remaining points as issues which are worth debating, and whose intricacies may be elucidating to the differences found:
Read 25 tweets
Feb 23, 2019
🔥off the press 🔥

Colleagues and I tackle admittedly contentious debates in ideology scholarship: ideological innocence, nexus between ideology’s most commonly theorized sub-structures (social & economic), and ideological asymmetries of PolPsy (via NeoLib).

Highlights below:
Using a set of high quality nationally representative surveys from professional survey companies (SSI/Research Now/YouGov), in the US and UK, & in which a greater number and range of ideological instruments and psychological constructs were administered, we demonstrated that >>>
1.) contrary to the ideological innocence (K&K) hypothesis, dating back to Converse (1964), *at least as of 2016*, we observed a surprisingly high degree of ideological coherence, when using both operational and symbolic ideological instruments.
Read 29 tweets
Jun 21, 2018
Proud to see published my first #openscience, collaborative and cumulative science project with great collaborators @jakewomick, @TobiasRothmund, @KinglaKing, and @JohnJost1.

A perfect start to #SIPS2018 in just a few days!

journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.117… #SPPS

Thread alert (1/12)
Methodologically, this work adds to the existing literature in a few meaningful ways. We used facets of established constructs to gain a more precise understanding of the psychological underpinnings of Trump supporters (2/12)
We analyzed psychological differences between politically relevant groups in the 2016 Election: Democrats, Republicans, and Trumpists in both primaries and general election. (3/12)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(