Thread by @ThyConsigliori

11 June 2022 - Between The Lines Rides Again...Almost

Today’s earlier analysis #ShestokasForIlAG generated a tremendous response. It got dramatically higher impressions numbers than I’ve been getting, lately. But the private response was off the charts.

BetweenTheLines.vote

2) The most important, though, was an extensive conversation I had with @shestokas. In it, he explained what may well be the ultimate reason his candidacy for Illinois AG is a national matter. I'll connect that conversation to my beloved polling site below.

3) One of the most important powers that the AG has in Illinois has to do with his function during elections. Consider the election corruption that the Chicago Machine holds sway over. Now, imagine an AG ready and willing to fight them to protect true vote integrity.

4) Discussing this with @KateScopelliti she found me the quote below. As you can see, in their infinite wisdom, the Tribune knows what happened in 2020 and excoriates @shestokas for his role in trying to legally get to the bottom of a stolen election.

5) Now, I'm not saying that the Tribune is nothing but a mouthpiece for the Chicago Vote Corruption Operation, but you have to know, that operation has NO desire for @shestokas to ever be AG. Their opposition is, to me, a ringing endorsement. They don't want Dave. Well, I do!

6) What @shestokas tells me is that an honest vote in 2024 absolutely puts Illinois in play. That changes the entire election map. We'll be analyzing many of the national election myths that the left has foisted as irrevocable, absolute truths. This is at the heart of the matter.

7) The corrupt machine most certainly accounts for the fact that Illinois votes deep blue. The left wants us to believe that Illinois can never be taken back. This, @shestokas explains, is simply just NOT true. Precisely what it will take is something we'll map out completely.

8) As I recall it, @shestokas isn't aware of the fabulous mission my website took on in 2020: Honest Questions, Honest Answers, Honest Data. Part of the reason he's not aware, is that we never published our data. That's a story worth telling.

9) As I recall, we only got answers from between 700 & 800 people. While we worked out a fantastic method for weighting our data fairly, the skew on the data was still so great I never got to a place where I could release it. It never met my high standards. I was very sad.

10) The data I did procure, however, pointed overwhelmingly toward a blowout landslide reelection for Trump. So imagine, I had a small quantity of indeed right leaning respondents. Even after correcting for that, the data was still shouting landslide. I couldn't release that.

11) As we watched the election get stolen, I had my first thoughts that perhaps my tiny sampling had been more accurate in its call than I realized. What it took to turn that landslide was vote fraud at the highest levels in American history. I have zero doubt about that.

12) Now we see the Democrats and the Establishment Republicans - can you say Uni-Party? - attempting to turn January 6 into a Trump-led insurrection. I'd be laughing if I weren't weeping. This is the extraordinary power they wield. They can turn lies into the perception of truth.

13) So I came to a decision today, during my conversation with @shestokas. It is time to resurrect BetweenTheLines.vote. No, it won't be able to ramp up in time for the coming midterms. But it can for the 2024 national elections.

14) If there were no other reason, the reason to support @shestokas - and absolutely for everyone, NOT only Illinois residents! - is that in office, his integrity carries over to the coming 2024 national election. I know I already said that. Be ready to hear again, frequently.

15) And it was when @shestokas was explaining that, I mean, precisely when he was explaining that, that I realized it was time to bring my beloved polling site back online...soon. But "beloved?" Why do I love this damned thing so much?

16) How many ways do I love thee? Let me count the ways. No, I'm kidding, I won't count them. They are almost countless anyway. But let me try to share, a little. First, I am the original data addict. That I almost had MY VERY OWN DATA, data I could completely believe in, oh my.

17) Second has to do with the LA Times Dornsife Daybreak Poll of 2016, and the travesty they made of their 2020 effort. Staying out of the weeds, only election fraud could have made their 2020 work accurate. I exhaustively analyzed that in 2020 and sadly rejected them.

18) The third reason may be the mother of all the others. It is the complete corruption of the entire polling apparatus in America. During the run up to 2020, I analyzed countless polls for their blatant and obvious destruction of scientific integrity.

19) I was intensely aware of the pattern of deceit and utter dishonesty back in 2016, but the Dornsife Poll was an outlier, giving us honest data when no one else was. I predicted the night that Trump won that the LA Times would never allow that to happen again. Alas.

20) So that's tonight's story. Election integrity by way of law enforcement officers who will use their vast power to obliterate election fraud. And, a return to true data we can actually believe. This is the best I've felt since November 2020. Let's fix all this. Right?

11 June #BetweenTheLines Analysis thread ends at #20.

Come join our discussion on topic over at Telegram, here:

t.me/ThyConsigliori…