11 June 2022 - Between The Lines Rides Again...Almost

Today’s earlier analysis #ShestokasForIlAG generated a tremendous response. It got dramatically higher impressions numbers than I’ve been getting, lately. But the private response was off the charts.

BetweenTheLines.vote
2) The most important, though, was an extensive conversation I had with @shestokas. In it, he explained what may well be the ultimate reason his candidacy for Illinois AG is a national matter. I'll connect that conversation to my beloved polling site below.
3) One of the most important powers that the AG has in Illinois has to do with his function during elections. Consider the election corruption that the Chicago Machine holds sway over. Now, imagine an AG ready and willing to fight them to protect true vote integrity.
4) Discussing this with @KateScopelliti she found me the quote below. As you can see, in their infinite wisdom, the Tribune knows what happened in 2020 and excoriates @shestokas for his role in trying to legally get to the bottom of a stolen election.
5) Now, I'm not saying that the Tribune is nothing but a mouthpiece for the Chicago Vote Corruption Operation, but you have to know, that operation has NO desire for @shestokas to ever be AG. Their opposition is, to me, a ringing endorsement. They don't want Dave. Well, I do!
6) What @shestokas tells me is that an honest vote in 2024 absolutely puts Illinois in play. That changes the entire election map. We'll be analyzing many of the national election myths that the left has foisted as irrevocable, absolute truths. This is at the heart of the matter.
7) The corrupt machine most certainly accounts for the fact that Illinois votes deep blue. The left wants us to believe that Illinois can never be taken back. This, @shestokas explains, is simply just NOT true. Precisely what it will take is something we'll map out completely.
8) As I recall it, @shestokas isn't aware of the fabulous mission my website took on in 2020: Honest Questions, Honest Answers, Honest Data. Part of the reason he's not aware, is that we never published our data. That's a story worth telling.
9) As I recall, we only got answers from between 700 & 800 people. While we worked out a fantastic method for weighting our data fairly, the skew on the data was still so great I never got to a place where I could release it. It never met my high standards. I was very sad.
10) The data I did procure, however, pointed overwhelmingly toward a blowout landslide reelection for Trump. So imagine, I had a small quantity of indeed right leaning respondents. Even after correcting for that, the data was still shouting landslide. I couldn't release that.
11) As we watched the election get stolen, I had my first thoughts that perhaps my tiny sampling had been more accurate in its call than I realized. What it took to turn that landslide was vote fraud at the highest levels in American history. I have zero doubt about that.
12) Now we see the Democrats and the Establishment Republicans - can you say Uni-Party? - attempting to turn January 6 into a Trump-led insurrection. I'd be laughing if I weren't weeping. This is the extraordinary power they wield. They can turn lies into the perception of truth.
13) So I came to a decision today, during my conversation with @shestokas. It is time to resurrect BetweenTheLines.vote. No, it won't be able to ramp up in time for the coming midterms. But it can for the 2024 national elections.
14) If there were no other reason, the reason to support @shestokas - and absolutely for everyone, NOT only Illinois residents! - is that in office, his integrity carries over to the coming 2024 national election. I know I already said that. Be ready to hear again, frequently.
15) And it was when @shestokas was explaining that, I mean, precisely when he was explaining that, that I realized it was time to bring my beloved polling site back online...soon. But "beloved?" Why do I love this damned thing so much?
16) How many ways do I love thee? Let me count the ways. No, I'm kidding, I won't count them. They are almost countless anyway. But let me try to share, a little. First, I am the original data addict. That I almost had MY VERY OWN DATA, data I could completely believe in, oh my.
17) Second has to do with the LA Times Dornsife Daybreak Poll of 2016, and the travesty they made of their 2020 effort. Staying out of the weeds, only election fraud could have made their 2020 work accurate. I exhaustively analyzed that in 2020 and sadly rejected them.
18) The third reason may be the mother of all the others. It is the complete corruption of the entire polling apparatus in America. During the run up to 2020, I analyzed countless polls for their blatant and obvious destruction of scientific integrity.
19) I was intensely aware of the pattern of deceit and utter dishonesty back in 2016, but the Dornsife Poll was an outlier, giving us honest data when no one else was. I predicted the night that Trump won that the LA Times would never allow that to happen again. Alas.
20) So that's tonight's story. Election integrity by way of law enforcement officers who will use their vast power to obliterate election fraud. And, a return to true data we can actually believe. This is the best I've felt since November 2020. Let's fix all this. Right?
11 June #BetweenTheLines Analysis thread ends at #20.

Come join our discussion on topic over at Telegram, here:

t.me/ThyConsigliori…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pasquale "Pat" Scopelliti

Pasquale

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThyConsigliori

Jun 11
@shestokas represents more than a pivotal point for Illinois. He represents a pivotal point for America. The Medievals had a beloved principle: As above, so also below. We’re going to explore that in Dave’s context, for America AND Illinois. Please read on…
2) For the Medievals, one of the most important aspects of that principle was the living presence of God’s will. They believed that what we see around us, here below, was the literal embodiment of God’s thoughts. To know His will, they studied its material expression here, below.
3) It is rarely taught, anymore, that all the roots of today’s scientific method harken back to the search for God’s Natural Laws. The Medievals were not done, though, seeing Divine Will from above. They inverted their statement. As below, so also above, they said.
Read 27 tweets
Jun 4
4 June 2022 #MAGAanalysis #SunTzuApplied

Tactical Lies, Strategic Dishonesty

In diagnosis, we differentiate between DESCRIPTION and PRESCRIPTION. To understand Master Sun's morality, you must go DESCRIPTIVE first, before PRESCRIPTION of any sort.

I'll explain...
2) In my coaching work, and when my clients blunder into war, they almost never believe that their enemy is actually an enemy, for whom lying is a moral mandate. Truth is, at first, they almost always land in the land of denial. "How could he lie to me like that," they ask?
3) We've blundered, ourselves, instantly into philosophy, and more specifically, metaphysics. For the ancient Greeks, physics was all about what IS. Metaphysics was about what SHOULD BE. Meta meaning "over" or "above" or "the goal." How SHOULD things be?
Read 27 tweets
Apr 30
30 April 2022 #MAGAanalysis #1AMinuteMen

Elon – The CEO That Wasn’t

How much should a business executive make the political wellbeing of his nation his work? We're going to consider that today, as well as just how historic @elonmusk's purchase of Twitter appears to be, so far.
2) How is Elon the CEO that wasn't? He's NOT the CEO of Twitter and most likely never will be. He owns - assuming all goes to completion - 9% of Twitter's stock putting him in the driver's seat as its "owner." He is also taking it private. This is all to the good. Greatly so.
3) As its "owner," Musk will have a huge impact on the platform. But NOT being its CEO, and NOT setting its policy-level activities, I fear his impact will be limited. I often say I'd love to be wrong, and when I do, I always mean it. Nowhere more so than here.
Read 26 tweets
Apr 20
20 April 2022 #MAGAanalysis #1AMinuteMen

For Hope We Look To The Young

Here's a new voice, a brilliant young man, @tommys_podcast, facing great challenges he's completely open to share, but with so much to offer it's stunning. I met him yesterday, here:

rumble.com/v11m6p2-tpc-78…
2) If you ever have the opportunity to be the guest on a podcast, I must urge, do it. Tommy is extraordinary, as we'll discuss. But the truth is I have to express great thanks to all such hosts who have given me the honor of being their guest. Here's why...
3) Every time I have the chance to be a guest, I learn things I'd never have learned in any other way. These hosts are, in so many ways, today's heroes. They sacrifice HUGE amounts of time, energy, love, and commitment to America's mission. And they learn so much, themselves!
Read 26 tweets
Mar 3
3 March #MAGAanalysis #1AMinuteMen

General Flynn’s Voice & That Of All Veterans
By Pasquale (Pat) Scopelliti

Let’s start out today’s analysis with a link to General Flynn’s website, where he posts his Official Statements.

generalflynn.com/official-state…
2) Below, we'll consider the statement he posted yesterday. Before that though, there are a couple of things to cover. The first - and most important - is that, believe it or not, this website is a dream come true for me. I'll explain.
3) A critical point to remember is how, and 10 December 2016, outgoing POTUS Obama warned incoming POTUS Trump against General Flynn. This was unprecedented, unheard of in Presidential transfer history. It was 100% inappropriate. How dare he?
Read 23 tweets
Feb 20
20 February 2022 #MAGAanalysis #1AMinuteMen

The Danger Of Absence In The Debate

Over the past couple of days, I spent over 2 1/2 hours with a reporter from one of the great, liberal, MSM newspapers. It was absolutely delightful, and I believe significant. I'll explain why.
2) At one point during our intense deep dive, my new friend said to me, "Oh, I see, I can't separate myself from my profession." This excellent journalist did not create the narrative. He has merely been swept along with it, and never saw that that was happening before.
3) At least twice he said, "I've never heard the facts presented from that perspective before." I will share specifics in just a bit, below. Here, I need to assert he is both an intelligent man, and a good man. And he is a true journalist, not a liar.
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(