I genuinely appreciate that there’s a ‘reasonableness’ thing at play in this issue, and that some folks, myself included, are throwing around the term ‘housing crisis’ — at least in #LdnOnt — though it’s not, in fact, been declared at any official level. I propose that we do. 1/n
We are facing in #LdnOnt *all* of these things, not just as trickle-down or domino effects, but SIMULTANEOUSLY across multiple scenarios for people seeking shelter, temporary, transitional, or permanent household, across classes and other intersectional identities.
2/n
And, of course, simultaneous with all of the above, in #LdnOnt, we do also have:
- folks seeking to buy their first home, again, in a heavily financialized market.
So, if we are unable to house any part of our population in the housing they seek, let’s call it an emergency. 5/n
If we adopt the language of emergency in #Ldnont for what many believe is a #HousingCrisis , it invites us better into an all-hands-on-deck mindset where no one sector gets to be (even a small) part of the problem and we’re all part of the solution. Reasonableness be damned. 6/6
I wonder if “elephant in the room” is the right expression here. It seems to me that Farhi is an oft-discussed element of downtown stagnation and hardly ever unremarked. I’d propose that the ‘thing-we-all-know-but-have-stopped-talking-about’ is something else. A short thread. 1/n
When I walk Downtown & the core — I do it a lot — I see vacant space all over. As a former business owner, born entrepreneur & community connector, I can’t stop scouting opportunities, and I see spaces owned by all manner of landlords. These are all steps from Market Tower. 2/n
Granted, many properties are owned by a few — this isn’t unique to #ldnont — the real question is ‘why is demand for core commercial & retail so weak?’ Why is it an issue who owns which properties? Why is there no hope to fill them all, or at least lower the vacancy rate? 3/n
Last week, I witnessed an astonishing presentation by a @CityofLdnOnt's advisory committee, rich in data, wide-ranging in evidence-based recommendations, compelling in its timeliness, persuasive in its urgency. Tonight the same report is getting pushback from councillors. 1/n
The pushback is not about the info in the report -- it's unassailable -- but about the role of such committees, and I'm astonished again. I wonder if maybe I don't understand what community advisory committees are s'posed to be doing at all. 'Cause this is what I thought.... 2/n
@shawnwlewis has a point: City staff have expertise -- in building parks, governance, waste diversion & so many more things. And councillors know stuff, too. But advisory committees are also made up of experts, by training & lived experience. They are the community's wisdom. 3/n
Even the best intentions don't excuse the lack of research or reasoning. Where to start? Obvs, motor vehicle licenses barely cover their own plate and admin costs and they are "permissions" to take giant dangerous moving objects through public space, a public trust. 1/n #ldnont
Next, obviously people on bikes are pretty much regular people even if they are BIKE RIDING PINKOS and, although they should get tax breaks for riding a bike some of the time (I mean it, they should), they don't. They pay taxes & pay for roads even if they only use a sliver. 2/n
In fact, it's motoring that is subsidized by the public purse. In ever so many ways that include propping up a failing industry, for example, but also directly. It takes many more of us to pay for roads than actually use them. A simple search tells you about costs of modes. 3/n