Godot is an invasive culture of imitators and wannabes that enjoy plagiarism. They are irresponsible and don't respect trademarks. Serious and responsible organizations that respect themselves don't do any of those things. #GodotEngine#CancelGodotEngine
When OkamStudio used to develop "The Interactive Adventures of Dog Mendonça & Pizzaboy" using #GodotEngine (@reduzio being the part of the development team) they have shamelessly stolen the "Indiana Jones" logo style.
Looks like Juan, lead developer of #Godot, aka @reduzio, removed the image of Donald Trump from his news article, hoping that nobody would notice! 🤷♂️
Godot Forums and The Mirror, the next Roblox-like platform, announced a business partnership.
What does it mean to @GodotEngine's supposedly bright future? 🙃
#TruthAboutGodot
Read the thread below. 🧵👇
To start off, Ariel Manzur, co-founder of Godot, has come on board with The Mirror as a technical advisor. Similar to Juan Linietsky, the lead developer of Godot, he represents Godot PLC and retains a permanent seat at Godot.
Juan Linietsky, another co-founder of Godot, once floated the idea and tested the waters within the Godot community, seeking their thoughts on platforms similar to Roblox. He posed some "philosophical" questions and even collaborated with Ariel on a similar game in the past.
He insinuates that people with negative experiences have no right to "ruin it for everybody". This narrative implies that the information could somehow ruin the entire project. If words hold such power, it raises questions about Godot's true capabilities.
Eventually, the follower of Godot uses other insinuations in an attempt to undermine the authority of the critic and labels genuine criticism as a conspiracy theory, which is typical behavior of members who are part of a toxic cult.
While I do have an emotional attachment to the project, which shows absolutely all signs of being an actual cult, as a former member of it, it's my ethical duty to talk about it. Some people may not understand the entire notion of ethics or duty in the first place, though...
Godot leadership's political stance against a Ukrainian contributor and maintainer has lead to unprecedented consequences for Godot leadership. They didn't expect that I'd continue talking about their wrongdoings for so long, and they thought that they could get away with this.
The "Messiah complex" of Juan stems from his desire to save the world from those "evil" corporations. Taken together with above, he probably wants to show that he's a "Superman":
But perhaps this has more deep roots. Recall the "Thanos" tweet of Juan? Perhaps this "Godot meteor" is connected with his desire to "purge" the userbase that use "commercial software"?
Notice how Godot leadership deliberately leaves out important information when they say it's a company of "Godot veterans", but those "Godot veterans" and Godot leadership are the same persons.
Feel free to familiarize yourself with my previous threads on this topic to understand why Godot is not community-driven and my explanation of why the mentality of Godot leadership is not open as you might have expected: