With typical liberal cravenness, Justice Sonia Sotomayor has leapt to the defense of #ClarenceThomas, whose wife Ginni was deeply involved in Trump's #January6th conspiracy to overthrow the election and establish a personal dictatorship. 1/ thehill.com/regulation/352…
She heaped praise upon Thomas, citing trivial incidents of his acts of personal kindness, as if remembering the names of employees at the Court and sending Sotomayor flowers when her father died outweigh his countless votes for executions and his efforts to outlaw abortions. 2/
Sotomayor's defense of Thomas is not only cowardly. It is also absolutely inappropriate. The involvement of Thomas' wife in a conspiracy to overthrow the government - about which the Justice was obviously aware - raises the most serious questions about his own involvement. 3/
Had Trump succeeded in blocking the certification of Biden's electoral vote majority, the election outcome would have been referred to the Supreme Court. Thomas, a silent accomplice in his wife's conspiracy, would not have recused himself from the Court's deliberations. 4/
As in 2000, when he cast one of the deciding votes in the Court's Bush v Gore 5-4 decision that stopped the counting of Florida's ballots and stole the election for Bush, Thomas would have been in a position to throw the election to Trump. 5/
The extent of Thomas' involvement in his wife's criminal activity is a matter for criminal investigation. Sotomayor's tribute to Thomas is clearly an attempt to prejudice and preempt an investigation, and to block his impeachment and removal. 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The extent of US-NATO preparation for war prior to the Russian invasion of Ukraine has been ignored in the media. But four years ago, in 2018, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported in an article on "Ukraine and Black Sea Security": 1/ #UkraineRussiaWar
"#NATO and Ukraine have cooperated in training, exercises and operations, and Ukraine has started to reform its armed forces and adapt its procedures and equipment to become NATO compatible. 2/
"Since 2014 the militaries of the United States and other NATO members have trained Ukrainian Army combat units at the Yavoriv Combat Training Centre at the rate of about 6-7 battalions (about 4000 soldiers) every year. 3/
The NY Times, which has been thundering against Putin, sagely advises its readers that Biden's planned trip to Saudi Arabia "represents the triumph of realpolitik over moral outrage, according to foreign policy experts." No doubt. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar
But there may be a deeply moral purpose behind the trip. Biden will, if time allows, take the opportunity to ask Sultan Mohammed bin Salman where his killers disposed of the dismembered corpse of poor Washington Post columnist #JamalKhashoggi. 2/
Biden's trip to Saudi Arabia exposes the hypocrisy of the imperialist war against Russia. On March 12, the blood-drenched Saudi regime executed 81 civilian dissidents. 3/
On May 3 Thomas Friedman, the NY Times' lead columnist wrote: "A Message to the Biden Team on Ukraine: Talk Less." He added: And let’s be careful not to raise Ukrainian expectations too high. Small countries that suddenly get the backing of big powers can get intoxicated." 1/
On May 6, Friedman again expressed concern that the war was spinning out of control, writing "The war is getting dangerous for America, and Biden knows it" and that "falling in love with Ukraine in ways that will get us enmeshed there forever, is the height of folly." 2/
On May 22, Friedman reported that he had been invited to have lunch with Biden at the White House, where he washed down a tuna fish salad with a chocolate milk shake. Friedman explained that Biden's comments were "all off the record — so I can’t tell you anything he said." 3/
The Biden administration's decision to provide Ukraine with what the president himself described yesterday in a NY Times column as "advanced rocket systems" is a massive escalation of the war with potentially catastrophic consequences. #UkraineRussiaWar 1/
Biden's claim that "We do not seek a war between NATO and Russia" is a lie. NATO, supplying Ukraine with unlimited financial and military support, is at war with Russia. And having made this vast commitment, the US is taking reckless actions to defeat Russia. 2/
Biden writes: "So long as the United States or our allies are not attacked, we will not be directly engaged in this conflict, either by sending American troops to fight in Ukraine or by attacking Russian forces." 3/
In years to come, serious historians will examine the tragic consequences of the US drive for global hegemony in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. 1/ #UkraineWar
They will expose the geopolitical and economic interests that motivated the decades of wars unleashed by the United States in the Balkans, Middle East and Central Asia between 1991 and 2021, at the cost of several million lives. 2/
In reconstructing this escalating rampage of violence, culminating in the launching of war against Russia, historians will call attention to the intellectual and moral disintegration of large numbers of academics, who served as lying and cowardly accomplices of US imperialism. 3/
The #NYTimes editorial - titled "The War in Ukraine is Getting Complicated, and America Isn't Ready" - indicates serious divisions within and between the White House and intelligence agencies over the course of NATO's war against Russia. 1/ #UkraineRussianWar
The NYT expresses concerns about the war's "extraordinary costs and serious dangers," and states "there are many questions that President Biden has yet to answer for the American public with regard to the continued involvement of the United States in this conflict." 2/
For the last three months the NYT has incited pro-war and anti-Russia hysteria. But it now writes that it is not "in America's best interest to plunge into an all-out war with Russia, even if a negotiated peace may require Ukraine to make some hard decisions." 3/